LOL this is beautiful. Who is doing this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_schoo ... ted_StatesDr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!
Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- chandhi

- Posts: 1896
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
VapidP

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
What is this wiki?Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!
Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_schoo ... ted_StatesVapidP wrote:What is this wiki?Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!
Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....
-
VapidP

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Hmm either it changed back, or I'm seeing a cached page because GT is still there.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_schoo ... ted_StatesVapidP wrote:What is this wiki?Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!
Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KateMcKitten

- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Sorry for delayed response on this. Nope, all my LORs were submitted to LSAC in October and I took the December LSAT, so everything was clear on my end by 1/9. Maybe LSAC had a delay on sending some parts over? I have honestly no idea why some apps go complete very quickly and others take over a month.appind wrote: is that you submitted 1/9 but didn't complete till Feb because they were waiting on some score or rec? many applied after that and went complete in jan. Wondering why apps go complete out of order.
-
CenterFringe

- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:30 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Looks like T-13 is the new T-14? Judging from the wiki anyway.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Hahah please doood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
-
nonononono

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:46 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand deliveredKinch08 wrote:Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
- hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
+1 no T14 for 10? yearsCenterFringe wrote:Looks like T-13 is the new T-14? Judging from the wiki anyway.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/nonononono wrote:Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand deliveredKinch08 wrote:Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Send a follow up arrangement? Make sure the card states "I believe me last arrangement went to the worker's lounge. This was not the intent. Please only deliver to adcomms."ood's_brother wrote:My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/nonononono wrote:Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand deliveredKinch08 wrote:Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.ashrice13 wrote:Send a follow up arrangement? Make sure the card states "I believe me last arrangement went to the worker's lounge. This was not the intent. Please only deliver to adcomms."ood's_brother wrote:My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/nonononono wrote:Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand deliveredKinch08 wrote:Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers genderood's_brother wrote:I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.ashrice13 wrote:Send a follow up arrangement? Make sure the card states "I believe me last arrangement went to the worker's lounge. This was not the intent. Please only deliver to adcomms."ood's_brother wrote:My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/nonononono wrote:Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand deliveredKinch08 wrote:Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?
They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Nah brah, it's MAGA times. Trump consolidated all genders and regulations. Only two ✌.mrgstephe wrote:
bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers gender
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Replace the He/She pronoun with "It" I believe this is the most PC way to move forward with your card and fruit delivery.canafsa wrote:That's why I refer to everyone as "zher" until they tell me otherwise.mrgstephe wrote:bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers genderood's_brother wrote: I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I hope they include our hard hitting analysis on the next piece published that cites TLSashrice13 wrote:Replace the He/She pronoun with "It" I believe this is the most PC way to move forward with your card and fruit delivery.canafsa wrote:That's why I refer to everyone as "zher" until they tell me otherwise.mrgstephe wrote:bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers genderood's_brother wrote: I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Nope - gotta go with the third person "they"ashrice13 wrote:Replace the He/She pronoun with "It" I believe this is the most PC way to move forward with your card and fruit delivery.canafsa wrote:That's why I refer to everyone as "zher" until they tell me otherwise.mrgstephe wrote:bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers genderood's_brother wrote: I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Will let y'all know if edible arrangements reaches out to me for sponsorship. I may not even have to throw my life away at law school.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
alpinespring

- Posts: 97
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by alpinespring on Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Not cool dude. They are great people. I assume you were being sarcastic.alpinespring wrote:HLS should immediately fire its Admissions Director.
What a lousy job must she/he have done for the ranking to drop to #3
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/02/27/i ... abilities/
(disclaimer: those people no longer work at HLS)
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
^ that happened in like 2013
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login