Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh dear, guys. We are really struggling with this counting thing.
eta: scooped by draw
eta: scooped by draw
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
vuthy wrote:3
4
ohmygod seriously?
5
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
kathj06

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm sorry Smurff
To whoever asked about WL--I think status checker says DLS and the waitlist offer comes via snail mail, but you can call the admissions office before you get your letter to ask. PS: I went to Michigan ASW and met some folks who, like me, have been waiting since September.
To whoever asked about WL--I think status checker says DLS and the waitlist offer comes via snail mail, but you can call the admissions office before you get your letter to ask. PS: I went to Michigan ASW and met some folks who, like me, have been waiting since September.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Tue May 13, 2014 10:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Vursz

- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:31 pm
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Magic number 8
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
well, this is why none of us are going into engineering or another math dominated field. numbers are harddrawstring wrote:not a good start
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
FTFYFuriousDuck wrote:I think there are quite a few of us still left at this stage. They seem to be sitting on pretty much everyone with above median numbers.69
-
jjmaple8

- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
omg, we need to start this count over. I'm so confused about what number we're actually at 
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
We were at 10. Soldier on, friends.kershka wrote:omg, we need to start this count over. I'm so confused about what number we're actually at
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol, I just went back and counted. You make 11 assuming that you haven't posted before. Okay people, let's stay on top of this.muzzy wrote:...1?kershka wrote:omg, we need to start this count over. I'm so confused about what number we're actually at
At the very least, this will freak people out by the page jump.
Maybe this is why SLS hasn't admitted us?
ETA: okay, you did post before. 10. finite.
Edit 2: made "has" into "hasn't". Clearly the optimism is getting to me
Last edited by kershka on Mon Apr 07, 2014 5:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- dnptan

- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
AAAAH!dnptan wrote:12 then?
11.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Muzzy posted en español (he/she was 6).kershka wrote:lol, I just went back and counted. You make 11 assuming that you haven't posted before. Okay people, let's stay on top of this.muzzy wrote:...1?kershka wrote:omg, we need to start this count over. I'm so confused about what number we're actually at
At the very least, this will freak people out by the page jump.
Maybe this is why SLS has admitted us?
ETA: okay, you did post before. 10. finite.
-
Scvaz7

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
- Moltenmama

- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Nah. I was just adding something to my file. I figure it will only prolong the inevitable, but what the hay.love4life29 wrote:Did you get any valuable info??Moltenmama wrote:Ooh, ooh! Me!Chalupa-Batman wrote:Raise your hand if you also let yourself believe we'd finally see movement today now that asw is over.
And they just replied to the email I sent near the first of April. I was getting worried. But not worried enough to actually call. No, never that.
-
love4life29

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
12Scvaz7 wrote:13
13love4life29 wrote:14
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jjmaple8

- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yeah I think this was the primary source of confusion.koalacity wrote:Muzzy posted en español (he/she was 6).kershka wrote:lol, I just went back and counted. You make 11 assuming that you haven't posted before. Okay people, let's stay on top of this.muzzy wrote:...1?kershka wrote:omg, we need to start this count over. I'm so confused about what number we're actually at
At the very least, this will freak people out by the page jump.
Maybe this is why SLS has admitted us?
ETA: okay, you did post before. 10. finite.
Other posters will be so disappointed with the pages jumps (assuming we aren't all here already...)
-
baconwrapped

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:30 pm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login