U Chicago 2010 Forum
- johnstuartmill

- Posts: 211
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:53 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I guess this is the part of the cycle where I start kicking myself for applying ED. I grew up on welfare, Chicago! Don't stiff me on the grants!
- soullesswonder

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
where were the stats? above the 75ths?CardinalRules wrote:I read the essay, and it was OK. Nothing remarkable, but nothing glaringly wrong either. Oh, and I just checked with the person: straight-up ding.
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
LSAT above 75th, GPA right around 75th.soullesswonder wrote:where were the stats? above the 75ths?CardinalRules wrote:I read the essay, and it was OK. Nothing remarkable, but nothing glaringly wrong either. Oh, and I just checked with the person: straight-up ding.
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Your name and tar are amazing.Anastasia Dee Dualla wrote:Oh, well thanks for the heads up! I hope I get something...it would make my decision easier if I don't get something from NYU.
Rewatching BSG's second season right now
- soullesswonder

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
CardinalRules wrote:LSAT above 75th, GPA right around 75th.soullesswonder wrote:where were the stats? above the 75ths?CardinalRules wrote:I read the essay, and it was OK. Nothing remarkable, but nothing glaringly wrong either. Oh, and I just checked with the person: straight-up ding.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I think that they thought that the person was definitely not going and just sending in the essay for the hell of it. They're already in at HLS.soullesswonder wrote:CardinalRules wrote:LSAT above 75th, GPA right around 75th.soullesswonder wrote:where were the stats? above the 75ths?CardinalRules wrote:I read the essay, and it was OK. Nothing remarkable, but nothing glaringly wrong either. Oh, and I just checked with the person: straight-up ding.WTF is going on in Hyde Park?
EDIT: But I would think that the same thing could be said for most of the people who were invited to send the essays (they're HYS caliber and overqualified for Chicago), so I'm not sure what they're trying to establish with this exercise.
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
For those still waiting my UR just updated from 2/15 to 2/25... Not sure if it is a bad sign or good. Probably bad. 
How do they let people know decisions? Phone for accept, what for WL and Reject?
How do they let people know decisions? Phone for accept, what for WL and Reject?
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
wow, IIRC, you went complete a couple days before me & you're going UR for the 2nd time? I haven't even gone UR onceKakarot wrote:For those still waiting my UR just updated from 2/15 to 2/25... Not sure if it is a bad sign or good. Probably bad.
How do they let people know decisions? Phone for accept, what for WL and Reject?
They notify WLs & rejects via email.
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I went complete on 12/11blue5385 wrote:wow, IIRC, you went complete a couple days before me & you're going UR for the 2nd time? I haven't even gone UR onceKakarot wrote:For those still waiting my UR just updated from 2/15 to 2/25... Not sure if it is a bad sign or good. Probably bad.
How do they let people know decisions? Phone for accept, what for WL and Reject?![]()
They notify WLs & rejects via email.
Time to turn off my e-mails then... Me and Chicago are polar opposites in economics views and my views come out crystal clear in my application. I would still consider going there, especially if they let me sit in on other classes in the school.
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
I went complete on 12/14.Kakarot wrote:I went complete on 12/11blue5385 wrote:wow, IIRC, you went complete a couple days before me & you're going UR for the 2nd time? I haven't even gone UR onceKakarot wrote:For those still waiting my UR just updated from 2/15 to 2/25... Not sure if it is a bad sign or good. Probably bad.
How do they let people know decisions? Phone for accept, what for WL and Reject?![]()
They notify WLs & rejects via email.
Time to turn off my e-mails then... Me and Chicago are polar opposites in economics views and my views come out crystal clear in my application. I would still consider going there, especially if they let me sit in on other classes in the school.
From what other people ITT have been saying, U of C seems to have a more holistic review process than most people give them credit for & won't ding someone solely based on the fact that their views conflict with the prevailing views at U of C...so I wouldn't worry about that part of my app if I were you.
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I can't imagine any school wants a completely homogeneous class, in political/economic views or in future plans. Chicago isn't Pepperdine or Liberty; I doubt they will ding every person who expresses opposing views, wants to go into PI, etc.
- kittenmittons

- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
To be fair, they might when the opposing views are objectively incorrect.puppleberry finn wrote:I can't imagine any school wants a completely homogeneous class, in political/economic views or in future plans. Chicago isn't Pepperdine or Liberty; I doubt they will ding every person who expresses opposing views, wants to go into PI, etc.
hth
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Haha, I love this response.kittenmittons wrote:To be fair, they might when the opposing views are objectively incorrect.puppleberry finn wrote:I can't imagine any school wants a completely homogeneous class, in political/economic views or in future plans. Chicago isn't Pepperdine or Liberty; I doubt they will ding every person who expresses opposing views, wants to go into PI, etc.
hth
Quote from Chicago: the University of Chicago refuses to grant degrees in Defense Against the Dark Arts—although one couldn’t blame the Economics department for a lack of trying.
--LinkRemoved--
I would assume me = dark arts they are referencing.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
LDC

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:47 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Eeeeek... I went UR on 2/15 as well. Getting nervous!!!! 
- puppleberry finn

- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
this makes me want to go to Chicago slightly more?Kakarot wrote: Quote from Chicago: the University of Chicago refuses to grant degrees in Defense Against the Dark Arts—although one couldn’t blame the Economics department for a lack of trying.
--LinkRemoved--
I would assume me = dark arts they are referencing.
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Did you update to 2/25?LDC wrote:Eeeeek... I went UR on 2/15 as well. Getting nervous!!!!
It is their undergrad, but still funny. I am mainly joking about them keeping me out. I actually think it will help in getting into the law school.puppleberry finn wrote:this makes me want to go to Chicago slightly more?Kakarot wrote: Quote from Chicago: the University of Chicago refuses to grant degrees in Defense Against the Dark Arts—although one couldn’t blame the Economics department for a lack of trying.
--LinkRemoved--
I would assume me = dark arts they are referencing.
-
dms87

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
UR 2/2 and 2/11 here (pretty sure I have the first date right). I went complete 12/3.
Shouldn't tomorrow be another batch of admits, and next week the WL/rejections?
Shouldn't tomorrow be another batch of admits, and next week the WL/rejections?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- mochafury

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:32 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
UR 2/11 and UR 2/25. Can avid Chi followers tell me what this means? Hear back tomorrow? If so, what medium?
- Fancy Pants

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Everyone goes UR at least twice before decisions are made. Some people go UR three times. Chicago will announce beforehand that they will be releasing decisions soon before they actually do it. What will happen is people go UR once or twice and then all of those people go UR again on the same date when they have a full committee meeting. Usually after that meeting, the next day acceptances will go out.mochafury wrote:UR 2/11 and UR 2/25. Can avid Chi followers tell me what this means? Hear back tomorrow? If so, what medium?
twitter.com/uchicagolawapps is where they will announce when they're releasing decisions.
- mochafury

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:32 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Thanks FP. I guess the next logical question would be: anyone else UR 2/25?
- Unitas

- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I believe just me so far as noted at the top of this page.mochafury wrote:Thanks FP. I guess the next logical question would be: anyone else UR 2/25?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Fancy Pants

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
No problem. In the past, it has been epic chaos around here on committee review days and so you can tell pretty quickly what's going on. Not positive that will be the same the next time around but I think it's likely.mochafury wrote:Thanks FP. I guess the next logical question would be: anyone else UR 2/25?
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yep. Was 2/9, now 2/25.mochafury wrote:Thanks FP. I guess the next logical question would be: anyone else UR 2/25?
-
LDC

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:47 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
anyone else still UR at 2/15? (i was complete 12/10.) i'm getting nervous that it hasn't updated 
-
Cherith Cutestory

- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:58 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
UR 2/25 as well (first UR 2/19). Complete 12/15.
Freaking out a little now.
Freaking out a little now.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login