Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- calpolisci2016

- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Nothingcalpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I tend to think minimal. All apps are in. It's not like they give merit scholarships to incentivize higher numbers, plus they are marginally less attractive.calpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I wouldn't even say marginally. I don't think anyone is choosing SLS over HLS or the other way around because of these rankings. There are reasons that each institution may be preferable for someone...being number 2 or 3 probably isn't one of them.LHS17 wrote:I tend to think minimal. All apps are in. It's not like they give merit scholarships to incentivize higher numbers, plus they are marginally less attractive.calpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
harmcharm

- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:26 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think with H's higher acceptance rate and lower LSAT median setting it apart from S, many people considered it #3 anyway (just me?).ashrice13 wrote:I wouldn't even say marginally. I don't think anyone is choosing SLS over HLS or the other way around because of these rankings. There are reasons that each institution may be preferable for someone...being number 2 or 3 probably isn't one of them.LHS17 wrote:I tend to think minimal. All apps are in. It's not like they give merit scholarships to incentivize higher numbers, plus they are marginally less attractive.calpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It's the only one I thought I had a chance of getting into so yeahharmcharm wrote:I think with H's higher acceptance rate and lower LSAT median setting it apart from S, many people considered it #3 anyway (just me?).ashrice13 wrote:I wouldn't even say marginally. I don't think anyone is choosing SLS over HLS or the other way around because of these rankings. There are reasons that each institution may be preferable for someone...being number 2 or 3 probably isn't one of them.LHS17 wrote:I tend to think minimal. All apps are in. It's not like they give merit scholarships to incentivize higher numbers, plus they are marginally less attractive.calpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
Last edited by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash on Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
H has a higher LSAT median than Sharmcharm wrote:I think with H's higher acceptance rate and lower LSAT median setting it apart from S, many people considered it #3 anyway (just me?).ashrice13 wrote:I wouldn't even say marginally. I don't think anyone is choosing SLS over HLS or the other way around because of these rankings. There are reasons that each institution may be preferable for someone...being number 2 or 3 probably isn't one of them.LHS17 wrote:I tend to think minimal. All apps are in. It's not like they give merit scholarships to incentivize higher numbers, plus they are marginally less attractive.calpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
- galeatus

- Posts: 957
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 5:53 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah same here. Admissions-wise the clear YS and H split has been around for aaaages.harmcharm wrote:I think with H's higher acceptance rate and lower LSAT median setting it apart from S, many people considered it #3 anyway (just me?).ashrice13 wrote:I wouldn't even say marginally. I don't think anyone is choosing SLS over HLS or the other way around because of these rankings. There are reasons that each institution may be preferable for someone...being number 2 or 3 probably isn't one of them.LHS17 wrote:I tend to think minimal. All apps are in. It's not like they give merit scholarships to incentivize higher numbers, plus they are marginally less attractive.calpolisci2016 wrote:What does H dropping to 3 mean for their JS2 selection from here on out?
- poptart123

- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
This is the second time it's happened now, I believe.harmcharm wrote:Holy crap on a cracker, GULC is out of the T14?anonperson2017 wrote:new rankings are out for 2018: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
Stanford now takes number 2 by itself and HLS has dropped to 3.correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that wasn't projected to happen.
-
anonperson2017

- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 9:05 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Well this news does marginally make SLS more tempting, which also increases every day that I sit here waiting for a JS2 with an SLS offer in hand
-
katthegreat11

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Nerrrrr it is not. GULC was tied with Texas in 2011 but never dropped out of the T14 completely. This is unprecedented.poptart123 wrote:This is the second time it's happened now, I believe.harmcharm wrote:Holy crap on a cracker, GULC is out of the T14?anonperson2017 wrote:new rankings are out for 2018: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
Stanford now takes number 2 by itself and HLS has dropped to 3.correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that wasn't projected to happen.
2000-2008 rankings: http://www.prelawhandbook.com/law_schoo ... 00_present
2009-2016 rankings: https://7sage.com/top-law-school-rankings/
- texteach

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
If your decision to attend SLS over HLS was caused by this one place shift in ranking - you petty, bebez.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
anonperson2017

- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 9:05 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I don't think anyone seriously thinks that-- it's all just in jest as we anxiously await a new wave of JS2stexteach wrote:If your decision to attend SLS over HLS was caused by this one place shift in ranking - you petty, bebez.
- TudoBem

- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Well, Harvard will remain #1 in the hearts of many people...
Love that U Chicago remains strong at #4! Winner!!!
Love that U Chicago remains strong at #4! Winner!!!
- texteach

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I'm sure that's true - the commentary just gave me the opportunity to use the word 'petty', so I had to take itanonperson2017 wrote:I don't think anyone seriously thinks that-- it's all just in jest as we anxiously await a new wave of JS2stexteach wrote:If your decision to attend SLS over HLS was caused by this one place shift in ranking - you petty, bebez.
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Mar 08, 2017 3:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
CA1993

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:01 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CA1993 on Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
VA2lawschool

- Posts: 203
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I wouldn't, but that's because I'm pretty sure HLS says on their blog that they don't want extra information before a waitlist, and when you're WLed they don't even want an extra LOR (unless, of course, that person has a close personal relationship with the Dean or something).CHyde wrote:LOCI/Additional LOR after JS1 but before (possible) waitlist - should I do it?
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Last year there were JS2 waves on 3/10 and 3/11, and they were the last that the class of 2019 got until March 28 (so, the very end of March, those last few days when everyone knows they're going to get a decision one way or the other).
Whatever wave or dual-wave corresponds to that one this year may (or, of course, may not) be the penultimate one for the class of 2020. Technically, there were eight JS2 waves last year, and there've only been three this year AFAIK (12/19, 1/25, and 2/22). BUT, if you count two-day waves as a single wave (I think we should), there were only five last year--meaning that we only have two left this year, one of which would correspond to the 3/10-3/11 wave. If this is the case--and I'll go ahead and assume that it is, for kicks and gigles--we're really close to the moment of truth. So when's it coming? It could be as early as this Friday (3/10) or as late as next Friday (3/17). I'm going to go ahead and say, with no evidence whatsoever, that it probably won't come outside of that range--if it comes earlier, it won't be the penultimate wave, and if it came any later then there wouldn't be enough of a gap between it and the final wave.
There's still hope for people who haven't received JS1's as well, but only for about the same time frame. Past 3/17, I'm going to go ahead and say that there won't be a single JS1 handed out.
Exciting times.
Whatever wave or dual-wave corresponds to that one this year may (or, of course, may not) be the penultimate one for the class of 2020. Technically, there were eight JS2 waves last year, and there've only been three this year AFAIK (12/19, 1/25, and 2/22). BUT, if you count two-day waves as a single wave (I think we should), there were only five last year--meaning that we only have two left this year, one of which would correspond to the 3/10-3/11 wave. If this is the case--and I'll go ahead and assume that it is, for kicks and gigles--we're really close to the moment of truth. So when's it coming? It could be as early as this Friday (3/10) or as late as next Friday (3/17). I'm going to go ahead and say, with no evidence whatsoever, that it probably won't come outside of that range--if it comes earlier, it won't be the penultimate wave, and if it came any later then there wouldn't be enough of a gap between it and the final wave.
There's still hope for people who haven't received JS1's as well, but only for about the same time frame. Past 3/17, I'm going to go ahead and say that there won't be a single JS1 handed out.
Exciting times.
Last edited by Kinch08 on Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- hellohalo

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Basically you speculate everyday in the rest of March.Kinch08 wrote:Last year there were JS2 waves on 3/10 and 3/11, and they were the last that the class of 2019 got until March 28 (so, the very end of March, those last few days when everyone knows they're going to get a decision one way or the other).
Whatever wave or dual-wave corresponds to that one this year may (or, of course, may not) be the penultimate one for the class of 2020. If it is--and I'll go ahead and assume that it will be, for kicks and gigles--everyone'll either be celebrating or waiting for those last few days. So when's it coming? It could be as early as this Friday (3/10) or as late as next Friday (3/17). I'm going to go ahead and say, with no evidence whatsoever, that it probably won't come outside of that range--if it comes earlier, it won't be the penultimate wave, and if it came any later then there wouldn't be enough of a gap between it and the final wave.
Exciting times.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
scott2016

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:29 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by scott2016 on Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Not so! 8 days is a pretty tight window. And I don't think the final wave'll come until the 28th at the earliest, so that's only another 4. We can rule out 13 whole days, if I'm right, which I'm probably not! THIS IS GROUNDBREAKING!hellohalo wrote:
Basically you speculate everyday in the rest of March.
Unless I'm mistaken, none of the JS2 waves this year has come on a Thursday or a Friday. Monday-Wednesday-Wednesday (12/19-1/25-2/22).scott2016 wrote: Unless you already have a JS1, then you especially freak out on Thursdays and Fridays
-
scott2016

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:29 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by scott2016 on Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!
Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....
Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login