Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics) Forum

jrose5 · Post by **jrose5** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:58 pm

askyemcdonald wrote:
AztecaRex wrote:In!
Nice! Congrats! When did you go UR?

Congrats!!! Still going through URM pile, I suppose.

AztecaRex · Post by **AztecaRex** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:06 pm

askyemcdonald wrote:
AztecaRex wrote:In!
Nice! Congrats! When did you go UR?

Thanks for the kind words everybody! I went UR mid-December, if I recall correctly.

perspective · Post by **perspective** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:27 pm

Congrats Azteca. Now just transfer the acceptance over to Perspective...

gatorgirl4life · Post by **gatorgirl4life** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:34 pm

AztecaRex wrote:
askyemcdonald wrote:
AztecaRex wrote:In!
Nice! Congrats! When did you go UR?
Thanks for the kind words everybody! I went UR mid-December, if I recall correctly.

Congrats!!!

Oracl3 · Post by **Oracl3** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:46 pm

AztecaRex wrote:
askyemcdonald wrote:
AztecaRex wrote:In!
Nice! Congrats! When did you go UR?
Thanks for the kind words everybody! I went UR mid-December, if I recall correctly.

Good job!

BackToTheOldHouse · Post by **BackToTheOldHouse** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:47 pm

This is getting dangerous . . . I'm stairing at my phone while heading home from an out of town trip.

Please ring please ring please ring please

Hey-O · Post by **Hey-O** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:33 pm

BackToTheOldHouse wrote:This is getting dangerous . . . I'm stairing at my phone while heading home from an out of town trip.

Please ring please ring please ring please

Are you a urm? If so, then GOOD LUCK! Otherwise, I think they're done with none-URM candidates until second review in mid April.

jrose5 · Post by **jrose5** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:36 pm

Hey-O wrote:
BackToTheOldHouse wrote:This is getting dangerous . . . I'm stairing at my phone while heading home from an out of town trip.

Please ring please ring please ring please
Are you a urm? If so, then GOOD LUCK! Otherwise, I think they're done with none-URM candidates until second review in mid April.

+1

grayfoxx13 · Post by **grayfoxx13** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:59 pm

I know I am not getting in, but I applied on a whim anyway. I just checked my status checker, and it was just blank under term....should I just assume my rejection letter is on its way?

Knock · Post by **Knock** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:01 pm

grayfoxx13 wrote:I know I am not getting in, but I applied on a whim anyway. I just checked my status checker, and it was just blank under term....should I just assume my rejection letter is on its way?

Does it say "Decision Letter Sent" in big red letters up near the top?

grayfoxx13 · Post by **grayfoxx13** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:17 pm

Knock wrote:
grayfoxx13 wrote:I know I am not getting in, but I applied on a whim anyway. I just checked my status checker, and it was just blank under term....should I just assume my rejection letter is on its way?
Does it say "Decision Letter Sent" in big red letters up near the top?

It didn't before, but does now. Thanks for the help, can't blame me for trying

Knock · Post by **Knock** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:20 pm

grayfoxx13 wrote:
Knock wrote:
grayfoxx13 wrote:I know I am not getting in, but I applied on a whim anyway. I just checked my status checker, and it was just blank under term....should I just assume my rejection letter is on its way?
Does it say "Decision Letter Sent" in big red letters up near the top?
It didn't before, but does now. Thanks for the help, can't blame me for trying

Np, sorry to hear it and best of luck. Do you know when it updated?

grayfoxx13 · Post by **grayfoxx13** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:27 pm

Sometime between last Thursday and today.

tgir · Post by **tgir** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:35 pm

Ok, so most of the USNews business is total nonsense...

BUT Stanford now officially has the lowest student-faculty ratio of any law school in the country.

The Stig · Post by **The Stig** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:55 pm

tgir wrote:Ok, so most of the USNews business is total nonsense...

BUT Stanford now officially has the lowest student-faculty ratio of any law school in the country.

do you mind posting its full profile? some of us don't have access

Knock · Post by **Knock** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:55 pm

The Stig wrote:
tgir wrote:Ok, so most of the USNews business is total nonsense...

BUT Stanford now officially has the lowest student-faculty ratio of any law school in the country.
do you mind posting its full profile? some of us don't have access

Yes please!

cardinals1989 · Post by **cardinals1989** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:57 pm

Knock wrote:
The Stig wrote:
tgir wrote:Ok, so most of the USNews business is total nonsense...

BUT Stanford now officially has the lowest student-faculty ratio of any law school in the country.
do you mind posting its full profile? some of us don't have access
Yes please!

tgir · Post by **tgir** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:58 pm

Oh, sorry guys, I've not bought the subscription. The student-faculty numbers are available on the USNews website for free, if you just click on the name of the school on the main list.

Stanford's is 7.5, while Yale's is 7.7.

Lots of people are posting extra information from the schools' profiles on crazy-long TLS threads, though, if you're really interested in finding it all.

The Stig · Post by **The Stig** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:00 am

tgir wrote:Oh, sorry guys, I've not bought the subscription. The student-faculty numbers are available on the USNews website for free, if you just click on the name of the school on the main list.

Stanford's is 7.5, while Yale's is 7.7.

Lots of people are posting extra information from the schools' profiles on crazy-long TLS threads, though, if you're really interested in finding it all.

Wow...from my data from last year it was: YLS=6.8 to 1, SLS=8.6 to 1... that seems like a large switch for just one year!

tgir · Post by **tgir** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:02 am

The Stig wrote:
tgir wrote:Oh, sorry guys, I've not bought the subscription. The student-faculty numbers are available on the USNews website for free, if you just click on the name of the school on the main list.

Stanford's is 7.5, while Yale's is 7.7.

Lots of people are posting extra information from the schools' profiles on crazy-long TLS threads, though, if you're really interested in finding it all.
Wow...from my data from last year it was: YLS=6.8 to 1, SLS=8.6 to 1... that seems like a large switch for just one year!

Hmm....I have YLS=7.3, SLS=8.0 for last year. In any case, I know that Dean Kramer has made faculty hiring a priority, so I'm not surprised. SLS's SFR has been drifting down for years.

I even made this little chart one night when I got bored, lol.

SFR
Yale Harvard Stanford

2005 7.8 11 9.2
2006 7.3 10.5 8.6
2007 7.4 10.3 8.3
2008 6.8 10 8.6
2009 7.3 11 8
2010 7.7 12 7.5

The Stig · Post by **The Stig** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:08 am

tgir wrote:
The Stig wrote:
tgir wrote:Oh, sorry guys, I've not bought the subscription. The student-faculty numbers are available on the USNews website for free, if you just click on the name of the school on the main list.

Stanford's is 7.5, while Yale's is 7.7.

Lots of people are posting extra information from the schools' profiles on crazy-long TLS threads, though, if you're really interested in finding it all.
Wow...from my data from last year it was: YLS=6.8 to 1, SLS=8.6 to 1... that seems like a large switch for just one year!
Hmm....I have YLS=7.3, SLS=8.0 for last year. In any case, I know that Dean Kramer has made faculty hiring a priority, so I'm not surprised. SLS's SFR has been drifting down for years.

I even made this little chart one night when I got bored, lol.

SFR
Yale Harvard Stanford

2005 7.8 11 9.2
2006 7.3 10.5 8.6
2007 7.4 10.3 8.3
2008 6.8 10 8.6
2009 7.3 11 8
2010 7.7 12 7.5

looks like I have the 2008 data...I suppose I never bothered to update it

...looks like SLS is heading in the right direction, and HLS is heading in the opposite one (with YLS just kind of hovering...)

cardinals1989 · Post by **cardinals1989** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:08 am

The Stig wrote:
looks like I have the 2008 data...I suppose I never bothered to update it ...looks like SLS is heading in the right direction, and HLS is heading in the opposite one (with YLS just kind of hovering...)

Sounds about right...

chup · Post by **chup** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:46 am

Dean Kramer's plan is for each incoming student to have his or her own assigned faculty member by 2018.

True story.

tgir · Post by **tgir** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:13 am

In case anyone else is interested in following the Caltrain drama, a new development: --LinkRemoved--

hiddenfist · Post by **hiddenfist** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:21 am

Who did you all address the loci to?

Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics) Forum

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Register for access!

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Register now!

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?