I posted in there myself and then forgot all about it, thanks!englawyer wrote:check out this thread
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... &start=125
i posted my stats there too
Harvard 2010! Forum
-
portena

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
- englawyer

- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
don't get too worried. I completely missed my week's JR2 batch. I was picked up the following week.lightbulb1986 wrote:oh man i was in your guys' jr1 group and havent received the call yet...worried
-
lightbulb1986

- Posts: 127
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:29 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
.
Last edited by lightbulb1986 on Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- coollegemex

- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:01 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Looks like today is a mostly URM batch so just hang on he could be getting to you in a bit
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'm shocked that you got in. Congrats.philos wrote:JR2 just now. JR1 1/22. JR1 emails 1/15. Complete 1/14.
LSAT: 175
GPA: 3.68
URM
Ph.D. in philosophy from Harvard
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
lightbulb1986

- Posts: 127
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:29 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
.
Last edited by lightbulb1986 on Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- forza

- Posts: 3208
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
lol..Dignan wrote:I'm shocked that you got in. Congrats.philos wrote:JR2 just now. JR1 1/22. JR1 emails 1/15. Complete 1/14.
LSAT: 175
GPA: 3.68
URM
Ph.D. in philosophy from Harvard
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Didn't you/don't you go to Bama?forza wrote:lol..
-
mockstar

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1VoidSix wrote:I'd kill a man for a JR1 at this point.
- Sakura3210

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:29 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
I do not consider myself a violent person. That said...+2mockstar wrote:+1VoidSix wrote:I'd kill a man for a JR1 at this point.
-
CordeliusX

- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Sakura3210 wrote:I do not consider myself a violent person. That said...+2mockstar wrote:+1VoidSix wrote:I'd kill a man for a JR1 at this point.
EDIT: when do you think the Held folks will get reassessed?
-
citydweller09

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
My guess? Never. I took a look at the "Held at Harvard" threads from past years and didn't see any acceptances amid the limited number of people whose info was there. From the few people who did still have info up, it seems like a hold is just a precursor to being sent directly to the waitlist - do not pass Go, do not collect $200.CordeliusX wrote:Sakura3210 wrote:I do not consider myself a violent person. That said...+2mockstar wrote:+1VoidSix wrote:I'd kill a man for a JR1 at this point.I love how it's over the JR1, not JR2... I'm just a sore loser
EDIT: when do you think the Held folks will get reassessed?
Again, though, the info I found was limited, so perhaps someone better informed can weigh in.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I just checked this out and came up with different conclusion. I should've saved the links, but I didn't. Suffice it to say that most of the received a WL. However, I saw a few acceptances as well (probably about 25% of the people who posted originally). Given that many of the people in the thread I was examining decided against sending LOCI or didn't seem like they had done much since they originally applied, I think those of us that have improved GPAs, landed impressive jobs, got a little WE, published works, etc actually stand a decent chance of--if nothing else--getting off a waitlist.citydweller09 wrote:My guess? Never. I took a look at the "Held at Harvard" threads from past years and didn't see any acceptances amid the limited number of people whose info was there. From the few people who did still have info up, it seems like a hold is just a precursor to being sent directly to the waitlist - do not pass Go, do not collect $200.
Again, though, the info I found was limited, so perhaps someone better informed can weigh in.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Ugh you make me want to do something with my life, rather than post on TLS, so I can get into Harvard. Think a new LOR would woo them?VoidSix wrote:I just checked this out and came up with different conclusion. I should've saved the links, but I didn't. Suffice it to say that most of the received a WL. However, I saw a few acceptances as well (probably about 25% of the people who posted originally). Given that many of the people in the thread I was examining decided against sending LOCI or didn't seem like they had done much since they originally applied, I think those of us that have improved GPAs, landed impressive jobs, got a little WE, published works, etc actually stand a decent chance of--if nothing else--getting off a waitlist.citydweller09 wrote:My guess? Never. I took a look at the "Held at Harvard" threads from past years and didn't see any acceptances amid the limited number of people whose info was there. From the few people who did still have info up, it seems like a hold is just a precursor to being sent directly to the waitlist - do not pass Go, do not collect $200.
Again, though, the info I found was limited, so perhaps someone better informed can weigh in.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Jericwithers wrote:Ugh you make me want to do something with my life, rather than post on TLS, so I can get into Harvard. Think a new LOR would woo them?VoidSix wrote:I just checked this out and came up with different conclusion. I should've saved the links, but I didn't. Suffice it to say that most of the received a WL. However, I saw a few acceptances as well (probably about 25% of the people who posted originally). Given that many of the people in the thread I was examining decided against sending LOCI or didn't seem like they had done much since they originally applied, I think those of us that have improved GPAs, landed impressive jobs, got a little WE, published works, etc actually stand a decent chance of--if nothing else--getting off a waitlist.citydweller09 wrote:My guess? Never. I took a look at the "Held at Harvard" threads from past years and didn't see any acceptances amid the limited number of people whose info was there. From the few people who did still have info up, it seems like a hold is just a precursor to being sent directly to the waitlist - do not pass Go, do not collect $200.
Again, though, the info I found was limited, so perhaps someone better informed can weigh in.
I sent in an new LOR, a description of the new job I'm working at and a reference number, a description of my last semester and how it effected my transcripts (raised GPA minimally), a brief list of some accomplishments from the last five months, my plans for the next sixth months and a lot of love. Haha. hth.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I hope your LOCI wasn't as riddled with typos as the above post was.VoidSix wrote:I sent in an new LOR, a description of the new job I'm working at and a reference number, a description of my last semester and how it effected my transcripts (raised GPA minimally), a brief list of some accomplishments from the last five months, my plans for the next sixth months and a lot of love. Haha. hth.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Me too.crackberry wrote:I hope your LOCI wasn't as riddled with typos as the above post was.VoidSix wrote:I sent in an new LOR, a description of the new job I'm working at and a reference number, a description of my last semester and how it ffected my transcripts (raised GPA minimally), a brief list of some accomplishments from the last five months, my plans for the next sixth months and a lot of love. Haha. hth.
(I know the difference between effected and affected, promise)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- CoaltoNewCastle

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Just make sure you don't vomit on anything that costs more than $5 to replace.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Wow, you're cheap.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
- CoaltoNewCastle

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It's something I wanted to try anyway. It's actually a bet so if I fail I have to pay five dollars and the cost of the milk. I know that's ridiculous, but at least I'll learn something about myself.crackberry wrote:Wow, you're cheap.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
An hour might be enough time; just divide the gallon into six equal parts and drink one every 10 minutes. How long to do you have to hold it in to collect?CoaltoNewCastle wrote:It's something I wanted to try anyway. It's actually a bet so if I fail I have to pay five dollars and the cost of the milk. I know that's ridiculous, but at least I'll learn something about myself.crackberry wrote:Wow, you're cheap.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
Every time I've done it (twice) or seen it done, the challenge is to drink the gallon in 30 minutes and hold it in for 15. That, I think, is impossible.
- CoaltoNewCastle

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Tentatively the rule is that I'm not allowed to send it back up, but I can use the bathroom. 30 minutes sounds crazy.crackberry wrote:An hour might be enough time; just divide the gallon into six equal parts and drink one every 10 minutes. How long to do you have to hold it in to collect?CoaltoNewCastle wrote:It's something I wanted to try anyway. It's actually a bet so if I fail I have to pay five dollars and the cost of the milk. I know that's ridiculous, but at least I'll learn something about myself.crackberry wrote:Wow, you're cheap.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
Every time I've done it (twice) or seen it done, the challenge is to drink the gallon in 30 minutes and hold it in for 15. That, I think, is impossible.
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
- JollyGreenGiant

- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
In Wisconsin we call this "lunch"CoaltoNewCastle wrote:It's something I wanted to try anyway. It's actually a bet so if I fail I have to pay five dollars and the cost of the milk. I know that's ridiculous, but at least I'll learn something about myself.crackberry wrote:Wow, you're cheap.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I would drink a gallon of milk in an hour for a JR1. Of course I'm doing it for $5 anyway soon.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login