Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
290
79%
 
Total votes: 366

User avatar
nutellahero

New
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:02 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by nutellahero » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:01 am

Chalupa-Batman wrote:
vuthy wrote:a giant pile of applications in a box labeled "deny"?
Those were printouts from tinder. Rejected applications are burnt as an offering to USN&WR in hopes of a good harvest.

Chalupa, I really hope you get in.

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:14 am

nutellahero wrote:
Chalupa-Batman wrote:
vuthy wrote:a giant pile of applications in a box labeled "deny"?
Those were printouts from tinder. Rejected applications are burnt as an offering to USN&WR in hopes of a good harvest.

Chalupa, I really hope you get in.
Thanks! I'm really hoping Faye notices that at least one out of every four jokes I make on this thread is well received.

User avatar
andapieceoftoast

Bronze
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by andapieceoftoast » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:16 am

Chalupa-Batman wrote:
nutellahero wrote:
Chalupa-Batman wrote:
vuthy wrote:a giant pile of applications in a box labeled "deny"?
Those were printouts from tinder. Rejected applications are burnt as an offering to USN&WR in hopes of a good harvest.

Chalupa, I really hope you get in.
Thanks! I'm really hoping Faye notices that at least one out of every four jokes I make on this thread is well received.
Count me in on that sentiment. Plus your avatar and your jokes together are pure gold.

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:28 am

andapieceoftoast wrote:
Chalupa-Batman wrote:
nutellahero wrote:
Chalupa-Batman wrote: Those were printouts from tinder. Rejected applications are burnt as an offering to USN&WR in hopes of a good harvest.

Chalupa, I really hope you get in.
Thanks! I'm really hoping Faye notices that at least one out of every four jokes I make on this thread is well received.
Count me in on that sentiment. Plus your avatar and your jokes together are pure gold.
Aww shucks guys. I'm just a humble servant of jon taffer trying to do his work on earth.

I hope we all get to kick it in Paolo Alto in the fall. And by kick it i mean study a lot probably.

kathj06

Bronze
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:50 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by kathj06 » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:30 am

It would at least be nice to study under some palm trees. Sigh.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


esther0123

Bronze
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:40 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by esther0123 » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:01 pm

:cry: Give me closure

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Kimikho » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:04 pm

kathj06 wrote:It would at least be nice to study under some palm trees. Sigh.
FAKE palm trees.

EquallyWrong

Gold
Posts: 4475
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by EquallyWrong » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:32 pm

scoobers wrote:
kathj06 wrote:It would at least be nice to study under some palm trees. Sigh.
FAKE palm trees.
meaning they're plastic? or is this some kind of American Palm Tree Breeders Association rule?

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Kimikho » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:38 pm

EquallyWrong wrote:
scoobers wrote:
kathj06 wrote:It would at least be nice to study under some palm trees. Sigh.
FAKE palm trees.
meaning they're plastic? or is this some kind of American Palm Tree Breeders Association rule?
Palo Alto is actually too cold for palm trees.

They are there but the require a lot of maintenance.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Chalupa-Batman

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:49 pm

scoobers wrote:
EquallyWrong wrote:
scoobers wrote: FAKE palm trees.
meaning they're plastic? or is this some kind of American Palm Tree Breeders Association rule?
Palo Alto is actually too cold for palm trees.

They are there but the require a lot of maintenance.
Palo Alto, be advised: scoobers (that's right -THE scoobers) is having none of your perfidious tropical environment.

Eta: Apparently I have no idea how to spell palo alto even when it's in front of me. I'm definitely getting dinged.
Last edited by Chalupa-Batman on Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Icecold62

Bronze
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Icecold62 » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:50 pm

scoobers wrote:
EquallyWrong wrote:
scoobers wrote:
kathj06 wrote:It would at least be nice to study under some palm trees. Sigh.
FAKE palm trees.
meaning they're plastic? or is this some kind of American Palm Tree Breeders Association rule?
Palo Alto is actually too cold for palm trees.

They are there but the require a lot of maintenance.
So it's a APTBA issue.

EquallyWrong

Gold
Posts: 4475
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by EquallyWrong » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:50 pm

scoobers wrote:
EquallyWrong wrote:
scoobers wrote:
kathj06 wrote:It would at least be nice to study under some palm trees. Sigh.
FAKE palm trees.
meaning they're plastic? or is this some kind of American Palm Tree Breeders Association rule?
Palo Alto is actually too cold for palm trees.

They are there but the require a lot of maintenance.
new theory: the admissions team have been busy knitting sweaters for all the palm trees in Palo Alto, that's why it's been taking so long for us to hear back.

muzzy

Bronze
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by muzzy » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:16 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


jjmaple8

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by jjmaple8 » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:39 pm

muzzy wrote:I still hold that it's because they're creating a special TLS Fellows of 2017 and it's taking a while to figure out all the logistics.

Being a fellow requires high proficiency in .gifs, baseless speculation, and proper forum etiquette.

There are no real benefits.

ETA: benefits; Oxford comma.
Ahhhhhhh must get to 100 posts and start posting reaction gifs.

User avatar
koalacity

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by koalacity » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:43 pm

jjmaple8 wrote:
muzzy wrote:I still hold that it's because they're creating a special TLS Fellows of 2017 and it's taking a while to figure out all the logistics.

Being a fellow requires high proficiency in .gifs, baseless speculation, and proper forum etiquette.

There are no real benefits.

ETA: benefits; Oxford comma.
Ahhhhhhh must get to 100 posts and start posting reaction gifs.
One does not merely gifpoast their way into a TLS fellowship. It takes months of carefully cultivated posting and a thoughtfully-crafted narrative, but someday, you too can be TLSfamous.

User avatar
Jessasaurus

Bronze
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Jessasaurus » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:00 pm

koalacity wrote: One does not merely gifpoast their way into a TLS fellowship. It takes months of carefully cultivated posting and a thoughtfully-crafted narrative, but someday, you too can be TLSfamous.
ILL NEVER BE TLS FAMOUS :cry: :cry: :cry:

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:01 pm

koalacity wrote:
jjmaple8 wrote:
muzzy wrote:I still hold that it's because they're creating a special TLS Fellows of 2017 and it's taking a while to figure out all the logistics.

Being a fellow requires high proficiency in .gifs, baseless speculation, and proper forum etiquette.

There are no real benefits.

ETA: benefits; Oxford comma.
Ahhhhhhh must get to 100 posts and start posting reaction gifs.
One does not merely gifpoast their way into a TLS fellowship. It takes months of carefully cultivated posting and a thoughtfully-crafted narrative, but someday, you too can be TLSfamous.
I don't know if I have the neurotic credentials for a tls fellowship, but the process of waiting for a decision from Stanford is giving me hope.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


muzzy

Bronze
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by muzzy » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:04 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
koalacity

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by koalacity » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:05 pm

muzzy wrote:You definitely are a TLS fellow if your S status checker doesn't have a period at the end of your current status.
Cue massive uptick in traffic to http://www.law.stanford.edu/degrees/jd/ ... atus-check.

User avatar
teampeeta

Bronze
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by teampeeta » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:06 pm

Jessasaurus wrote:
koalacity wrote: One does not merely gifpoast their way into a TLS fellowship. It takes months of carefully cultivated posting and a thoughtfully-crafted narrative, but someday, you too can be TLSfamous.
ILL NEVER BE TLS FAMOUS :cry: :cry: :cry:
To paraphrase Lady Gaga, "I was always famous. It's just that nobody knew." :lol:

User avatar
neprep

Silver
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by neprep » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:49 pm

ATTN: FD
CC: Fac Review Committee
BCC: JS

Image

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


muzzy

Bronze
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by muzzy » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:52 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
neprep

Silver
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by neprep » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:55 pm

muzzy wrote:
neprep wrote:BCC: JS
Nice touch.
Passive aggressive BCCing is my most treasured and fulfilling avocation.

muzzy

Bronze
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by muzzy » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:15 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Post by Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:38 pm

Raise your hand if you also let yourself believe we'd finally see movement today now that asw is over.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”