Still alive w/ Stanford for some reason. Maybe they lost my applicationesperanto wrote:Another day has passed, and my app is still alive!
Submitted early Jan/ got complete mid Jan.
Median GPA/ 75%<LSAT/ K-JD.
How are ya'll doing guys?
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- KatyMarie

- Posts: 616
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:16 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
-
wheelhouse12

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Here we go...things will happen this week
-
love4life29

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Does anyone think there is any significance to the fact that Stanford has accepted 11 fewer people on LSN this year (waitlist acceptances excluded) than the previous two cycles? Is it possible that there are more acceptances to come?
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
If there aren't any pre-WL acceptances to come, what have they been doing with our applications? I'd expect more dings and some WLs by now. I'm thinking we'll see a few more straight acceptances.....although I haven't looked at the SLS data/trends as much as I have for other schools.
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tariffs

- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
How the hell am I still under review (11/25)? Just WL or ding me already so I can move on with my life sheesh.
- teampeeta

- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Seriously hoping Faye decides to make a lot of calls this week after ASW!
- Vincent

- Posts: 256
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
A little tidbit about the admissions process:
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...I have a hard time imagining it would be considered acceptable to delay admissions past the only ASW. It doesn't take that long to make a decision.Vincent wrote:A little tidbit about the admissions process:
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
- Vincent

- Posts: 256
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
ASW is extremely early this year because the law schools have been trying to jockey around Easter (Sunday, 4/20). Schools also were trying to avoid having their ASWs pile up on top of each other, which is why we get SLS this week (as opposed to two weeks from now), and HLS next week (and Chicago/Berkeley, etc.).scoobers wrote:...I have a hard time imagining it would be considered acceptable to delay admissions past the only ASW. It doesn't take that long to make a decision.Vincent wrote:A little tidbit about the admissions process:
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
And as I mentioned in my previous post, sometimes decisions get delayed for reasons Faye can't control.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Do you know when faculty review typically starts?
- bhs12

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I got the sense at ASW that they're close to done with direct admits at this point; my guess is that there will be a lot of movement in the next week or two.
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I can haz an acceptance?

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
IrishJew

- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm still optimistic. If they had already decided to WL/reject all of us they would let us know by now; they're not sadists (I hope). I think, and this is pure speculation, that there is a legitimate "maybe" pile and some of us will still get in. ASW was early this year, and that may have slowed things down in later March/early April relative to last year. I think there are still some spots and they'll go out soon.drawstring wrote:If there aren't any pre-WL acceptances to come, what have they been doing with our applications? I'd expect more dings and some WLs by now. I'm thinking we'll see a few more straight acceptances.....although I haven't looked at the SLS data/trends as much as I have for other schools.
-
IrishJew

- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yes, Stanford and Yale have begun firing faculty who take too long reviewing applications. Psych!scoobers wrote:...I have a hard time imagining it would be considered acceptable to delay admissions past the only ASW. It doesn't take that long to make a decision.Vincent wrote:A little tidbit about the admissions process:
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
- vuthy

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What does that mean exactly? Like, you heard specific things, or there was a giant pile of applications in a box labeled "deny"?bhs12 wrote:I got the sense at ASW that they're close to done with direct admits at this point; my guess is that there will be a lot of movement in the next week or two.
-
aserr007

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:47 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I want a decision yet I am so happy not to see DLS on my status check.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Chalupa-Batman

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Those were printouts from tinder. Rejected applications are burnt as an offering to USN&WR in hopes of a good harvest.vuthy wrote:a giant pile of applications in a box labeled "deny"?
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Agreed. No other school really waits from October to April+ for some applicants. "Making the class special" meaning some applicants hear nothing for over half a year -- many of whom have deposit deadlines at other schools but would pick Stanford as a first choice -- does a disservice to applicants, IMO.scoobers wrote:...I have a hard time imagining it would be considered acceptable to delay admissions past the only ASW. It doesn't take that long to make a decision.Vincent wrote:A little tidbit about the admissions process:
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Scvaz7

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
That's quite literally exactly how I feelKatyMarie wrote:Still alive w/ Stanford for some reason. Maybe they lost my applicationesperanto wrote:Another day has passed, and my app is still alive!
Submitted early Jan/ got complete mid Jan.
Median GPA/ 75%<LSAT/ K-JD.
How are ya'll doing guys?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- teampeeta

- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yeah, I don't know. That's a really long time. I never really understood why Stanford waited until the end of April to WL and ding certain candidates. It happens every year. Maybe Faye has more acceptances in the pipeline or maybe she's just covering herself in case there's some cataclysmic event and she loses more of her chosen class to YH and scholarships than usual.wtrc wrote:Agreed. No other school really waits from October to April+ for some applicants. "Making the class special" meaning some applicants hear nothing for over half a year -- many of whom have deposit deadlines at other schools but would pick Stanford as a first choice -- does a disservice to applicants, IMO.scoobers wrote:...I have a hard time imagining it would be considered acceptable to delay admissions past the only ASW. It doesn't take that long to make a decision.Vincent wrote:A little tidbit about the admissions process:
The faculty does have a hand in reading applications, and different faculty members may read at different rates. Sometimes, a delay may be simply due to a faculty member's busy schedule. Beyond that, I know Faye takes great care in evaluating each application, and expediting that process would take away a little bit of what makes each SLS class special. Sit tight!
I really do hope there's reason to be optimistic. I'd be curious to know what made bhs think SLS was done admitting people.
-
love4life29

- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Is ASW still going on? If so, I would think we wouldn't hear anything today.
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login