WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
We are 18, go bears.
- Ricky-Bobby

- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Would Spivey lie to us? I think not.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
It can't be official yet because the rankings aren't released to the public until tomorrow.
- isuperserial

- Posts: 518
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
- rion91

- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Wow kudos to WUSTL! Looks like Tamanaha is working some magic 
- ms9

- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Thanks for the clarification Spivey! And damn that two way tie at 146 is rough...MikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
- bound

- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
MikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?
-
pauly_biegler

- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 6:54 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
wow great news. WUSTL on the up and up.
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Get on your twitter grind and follow Spivey.Austinbound wrote: That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?
- bound

- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
JustHawkin wrote:Get on your twitter grind and follow Spivey.Austinbound wrote: That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?
Lol the rest still aren't posted on twitter.
- CookieDough

- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
- Ricky-Bobby

- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
- Attax

- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Congrats to WUSTL on the rise, this is exciting news for the school!MikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
- CookieDough

- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
- wittyhandle

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
- Ricky-Bobby

- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.wittyhandle wrote:CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
BahahahaRicky-Bobby wrote:It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.wittyhandle wrote:CookieDough wrote: Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
T-147 4lyfeMikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
- CookieDough

- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Ricky-Bobby wrote:It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.wittyhandle wrote:CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:
Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.
Boom. I win.
- BlackCanary

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- Ditka747

- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:02 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- Lebrarian_Booker

- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
As someone who lives in Minnesota I can confirmBlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- yossarian

- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
These are now available at every major suburb of every t50 metro in the nation. The Californians have won.Ditka747 wrote:Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
You. I like you.Ditka747 wrote:Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- nickpapagiorgio

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:05 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Has anyone interviewed with Will Fruhwirth? The web site lists him as an admissions coordinator. I have an interview scheduled with this fellow for tomorrow.