What are ur #'s if u dont mind me asking? im 3.5/170nchls23 wrote:Exact same dates.paulsung123 wrote:11/20 --> 4/7 --> now 4/18 IR
Here we go again.... this time DF?? I hope so.
USC 2011 Forum
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: USC 2011
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:57 pm
Re: USC 2011
complete 11/16 ---> 1st IR 3/30-----> 2nd IR 4/18paulsung123 wrote:11/20 --> 4/7 --> now 4/18 IR
Here we go again.... this time DF?? I hope so.
I hope they give me a decision soon.
- ktg808
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:07 pm
Re: USC 2011
i give up. Under review 1/26---3/16
- ihp12
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:33 pm
Re: USC 2011
Ding 4/18 3.0/168
Good luck to everyone still waiting!
Good luck to everyone still waiting!
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: USC 2011
Im another one with these exact same dates. 3.6/169nchls23 wrote:Exact same dates.paulsung123 wrote:11/20 --> 4/7 --> now 4/18 IR
Here we go again.... this time DF?? I hope so.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: USC 2011
I just had a revelation.
I think us 4/18 IR people are the batch that they are REALLY on the borderline about. Not too stunning of a revelation I know, but hear me out...
I suspect if they were to WL us, they would be afraid of losing us to other schools, so USC might purposely be giving us no response at all until their wave of deposits are in and they have a better sense of how many ppl they can admit.
So in other words, we are stuck in limbo, stronger than regular WL but not as good as admit, but might as well be the de facto WL.
Too much speculation?
I think us 4/18 IR people are the batch that they are REALLY on the borderline about. Not too stunning of a revelation I know, but hear me out...
I suspect if they were to WL us, they would be afraid of losing us to other schools, so USC might purposely be giving us no response at all until their wave of deposits are in and they have a better sense of how many ppl they can admit.
So in other words, we are stuck in limbo, stronger than regular WL but not as good as admit, but might as well be the de facto WL.
Too much speculation?
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: USC 2011
yeah way too muchpaulsung123 wrote:I just had a revelation.
I think us 4/18 IR people are the batch that they are REALLY on the borderline about. Not too stunning of a revelation I know, but hear me out...
I suspect if they were to WL us, they would be afraid of losing us to other schools, so USC might purposely be giving us no response at all until their wave of deposits are in and they have a better sense of how many ppl they can admit.
So in other words, we are stuck in limbo, stronger than regular WL but not as good as admit, but might as well be the de facto WL.
Too much speculation?
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:33 pm
Re: USC 2011
I say not enough. TLS was built for blind speculation.BlueDiamond wrote:yeah way too muchpaulsung123 wrote:I just had a revelation.
I think us 4/18 IR people are the batch that they are REALLY on the borderline about. Not too stunning of a revelation I know, but hear me out...
I suspect if they were to WL us, they would be afraid of losing us to other schools, so USC might purposely be giving us no response at all until their wave of deposits are in and they have a better sense of how many ppl they can admit.
So in other words, we are stuck in limbo, stronger than regular WL but not as good as admit, but might as well be the de facto WL.
Too much speculation?
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: USC 2011
Tends to happen when you've been "in-review" for 5 months.snichols16 wrote:I say not enough. TLS was built for blind speculation.BlueDiamond wrote:yeah way too muchpaulsung123 wrote:I just had a revelation.
I think us 4/18 IR people are the batch that they are REALLY on the borderline about. Not too stunning of a revelation I know, but hear me out...
I suspect if they were to WL us, they would be afraid of losing us to other schools, so USC might purposely be giving us no response at all until their wave of deposits are in and they have a better sense of how many ppl they can admit.
So in other words, we are stuck in limbo, stronger than regular WL but not as good as admit, but might as well be the de facto WL.
Too much speculation?
That's not an exaggeration.
FIVE months.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:04 pm
Re: USC 2011
Ok, so I accept your specutlations. Now, how long do you speculate that we will be in review? I just made it into review 4/18, and I feel lucky not to have been denied so far.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 12:54 pm
Re: USC 2011
Taking a stab at it, recall a bunch of people went into review on 4/7 and then were wlsted or df later that week. I also remember a lot of rejections from the df bunch. Maybe out of that entire 4/7 group, they winnowed it down to us, and now we are being considered for the few spots they have left at this point. But whoooo knowwwssnichols16 wrote:I say not enough. TLS was built for blind speculation.BlueDiamond wrote:yeah way too muchpaulsung123 wrote:I just had a revelation.
I think us 4/18 IR people are the batch that they are REALLY on the borderline about. Not too stunning of a revelation I know, but hear me out...
I suspect if they were to WL us, they would be afraid of losing us to other schools, so USC might purposely be giving us no response at all until their wave of deposits are in and they have a better sense of how many ppl they can admit.
So in other words, we are stuck in limbo, stronger than regular WL but not as good as admit, but might as well be the de facto WL.
Too much speculation?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 1:24 pm
Re: USC 2011
Just withdrew. Good luck to all of you, and hope the spot goes to a TLSer! 

- samtheclam1
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:01 am
Re: USC 2011
finally went into review today. i went complete 1/7
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:49 pm
Re: USC 2011
+1nchls23 wrote:Exact same dates.paulsung123 wrote:11/20 --> 4/7 --> now 4/18 IR
Here we go again.... this time DF?? I hope so.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: USC 2011
THANK YOU!flepper wrote:Just withdrew. Good luck to all of you, and hope the spot goes to a TLSer!
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: USC 2011
I speculate all the way into early May after USC gets a better idea of who's enrolling this upcoming fall.KiraMarie wrote:Ok, so I accept your specutlations. Now, how long do you speculate that we will be in review? I just made it into review 4/18, and I feel lucky not to have been denied so far.
4/18 IR already looking like a DF flop..... but better than rejection I suppose.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: USC 2011
guys, never underestimate the possibility your apps got lost. this is a lot of paper work when a school has 1000s of applicants, and at any school at least 5 get lost. never underestimate the likelihood of being one of those 5. also, you can always LOCI if it's been 5 months.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:39 am
Re: USC 2011
Did all applicants on the waiting list receive the email today re-emphasizing the importance of recording a video? I already submitted mine, just wondering what the level of waiting-list activity going on right now is.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: USC 2011
i just finished recording my 2nd porno. however, in this one i spank my partner with a gavel so hopefully it will indicate my passion for the law.sold123 wrote:Did all applicants on the waiting list receive the email today re-emphasizing the importance of recording a video? I already submitted mine, just wondering what the level of waiting-list activity going on right now is.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:39 am
Re: USC 2011
great idea. *begins writing script*. wait. that makes no sense. Porno don't need no script. Porno angry!flexityflex86 wrote:i just finished recording my 2nd porno. however, in this one i spank my partner with a gavel so hopefully it will indicate my passion for the law.sold123 wrote:Did all applicants on the waiting list receive the email today re-emphasizing the importance of recording a video? I already submitted mine, just wondering what the level of waiting-list activity going on right now is.
- helloperson
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: USC 2011
from the language of the email and prior emails i would assume so. i got one. as far as i can tell, the initial emails informing us of the wait list included a bit about the video interview, and it doesn't look like they distinguished between candidates on the latest email by whether they had already submitted the video since they included this bit: "If you have already submitted your interview," so why would they distinguish based on applicant strength when they supposedly have an unranked wait list when they don't distinguish by anything else on your application?sold123 wrote:Did all applicants on the waiting list receive the email today re-emphasizing the importance of recording a video? I already submitted mine, just wondering what the level of waiting-list activity going on right now is.
So I would say yes, the emails went to everyone on the wait list.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:39 am
Re: USC 2011
That's what I thought. But nobody posted anything on the matter and usually a couple posts follow any updates from schools.helloperson wrote:from the language of the email and prior emails i would assume so. i got one. as far as i can tell, the initial emails informing us of the wait list included a bit about the video interview, and it doesn't look like they distinguished between candidates on the latest email by whether they had already submitted the video since they included this bit: "If you have already submitted your interview," so why would they distinguish based on applicant strength when they supposedly have an unranked wait list when they don't distinguish by anything else on your application?sold123 wrote:Did all applicants on the waiting list receive the email today re-emphasizing the importance of recording a video? I already submitted mine, just wondering what the level of waiting-list activity going on right now is.
So I would say yes, the emails went to everyone on the wait list.
- Peace of Mind
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:44 pm
Re: USC 2011
I have been DF since 4/6 and have yet to receive anything? Anyone else in the same boat?
- Deuce
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:12 am
Re: USC 2011
How does the video interview work anyway? Pre-determined questions? Actually talk to someone? I can't find the info...
- helloperson
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: USC 2011
They sent a follow up email that explains all of this.Deuce wrote:How does the video interview work anyway? Pre-determined questions? Actually talk to someone? I can't find the info...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login