Take your YLS acceptance and stop freaking out the localshammy393 wrote:Regardless, we're at a point in the cycle where there are likely few JS1s to be handed out. Exactly how many, nobody knowsSmc1994 wrote:This time last year, Jeb Bush had just dropped out of the primary. A lot of unpredictable things can happen. Let's not extrapolate from incomplete data. Even with my optimistic analysis, I know how freaked out I would be if I read through this thread looking for information about JS1s. It's March, and I understand that our collective anxiety may soon reach fever pitch, but let's try to be a little bit considerate of whether our data contributions actually add something valuable to the available information.alpinespring wrote:Jesushammy393 wrote:At this point last year, only 4 out of 24 JS1 waves remainedMrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- Smc1994

- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
CA1993

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:01 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
- MrJD2020

- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:59 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
-
CA1993

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:01 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
yesss stay strong and good luck! i've given up all hopeMrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MrJD2020

- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:59 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Thank youKinch08 wrote:Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I sure hope they canCHyde wrote:I've heard HLS is much less black box (read: emphasis on softs) than Y & S. True or nah? Can softs really make the difference?Kinch08 wrote:Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
- MrJD2020

- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:59 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Only positive vibes in this thread from now on! Starting with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H50llsHm3kmrgstephe wrote:I sure hope they canCHyde wrote:I've heard HLS is much less black box (read: emphasis on softs) than Y & S. True or nah? Can softs really make the difference?Kinch08 wrote:Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
-
jpark86

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
im reallly banking on this too!mrgstephe wrote:I sure hope they canCHyde wrote:I've heard HLS is much less black box (read: emphasis on softs) than Y & S. True or nah? Can softs really make the difference?Kinch08 wrote:Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It's definitely true, but there's a lot of space between "less emphasis than Y/S" and "softs cannot make the difference."CHyde wrote:I've heard HLS is much less black box (read: emphasis on softs) than Y & S. True or nah? Can softs really make the difference?Kinch08 wrote:Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
Plenty of people who're below both 25ths get admitted every year; that would not be the case if softs could never matter.
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Kinch08 on Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dokumented

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:34 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I probably fit that profile, but no JS1, so hard to say.Kinch08 wrote:Many of them probably are, I'd imagine (IDK about a majority, but I suppose it's possible). Still, if softs had no impact at all, you would be able to predict success based on URM status and numbers alone; we have more than enough evidence from LSN etc. to determine that we can't do that.CHyde wrote:
Fair point. I'm curious as to how many of those below both 25ths are URM though. I'm going to assume...a majority.
- appind

- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Vast majority imo instead of just majority. I suspect there is no non-urm js1 that has both numbers below 25 percentile?CHyde wrote:Fair point. I'm curious as to how many of those below both 25ths are URM though. I'm going to assume...a majority.Kinch08 wrote:It's definitely true, but there's a lot of space between "less emphasis than Y/S" and "softs cannot make the difference."CHyde wrote:I've heard HLS is much less black box (read: emphasis on softs) than Y & S. True or nah? Can softs really make the difference?Kinch08 wrote:Your app sounded hella special last I heard. Low #s/good softs is the sweet spot for a march JS1. I believe.MrJD2020 wrote:*convinces himself there is something special about his app*CA1993 wrote:I think this time last year there was about a week of JS1s left... i would assume most of the ones from here on out would be people with lower stats but something else interesting about them (pure speculation)MrJD2020 wrote:What's our view on number of JS1s that might still go out or on percentage of this cycle's JS1s that have been scheduled or completed?
i think probably for those of us without something special about our app it's safe to say the chances are very slim
Plenty of people who're below both 25ths get admitted every year; that would not be the case if softs could never matter.
Last edited by appind on Fri Mar 03, 2017 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- appind

- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
can you share stats, dates?LHS17 wrote:
Me as well
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
While I know that this thread in itself doesn't necessarily constitute statistical significance, if we are to base any assessments off of it, the *vast* majority of sub 170 LSATs that get JS1s are URM. As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.Kinch08 wrote:Many of them probably are, I'd imagine (IDK about a majority, but I suppose it's possible). Still, if softs had no impact at all, you would be able to predict success based on URM status and numbers alone; we have more than enough evidence from LSN etc. to determine that we can't do that.CHyde wrote:
Fair point. I'm curious as to how many of those below both 25ths are URM though. I'm going to assume...a majority.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- appind

- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
true imo. May be there is NO non-URM so far with both < 25% with JS1 ?mrgstephe wrote:While I know that this thread in itself doesn't necessarily constitute statistical significance, if we are to base any assessments off of it, the *vast* majority of sub 170 LSATs that get JS1s are URM. As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.Kinch08 wrote:Many of them probably are, I'd imagine (IDK about a majority, but I suppose it's possible). Still, if softs had no impact at all, you would be able to predict success based on URM status and numbers alone; we have more than enough evidence from LSN etc. to determine that we can't do that.CHyde wrote:
Fair point. I'm curious as to how many of those below both 25ths are URM though. I'm going to assume...a majority.
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Conventional wisdom would indicate that is probably true. I'm hoping that I can sneak a JS1 with non-URM LSAT<25th, 75th<GPAappind wrote:true imo. May be there is NO non-URM so far with both < 25% with JS1 ?mrgstephe wrote:While I know that this thread in itself doesn't necessarily constitute statistical significance, if we are to base any assessments off of it, the *vast* majority of sub 170 LSATs that get JS1s are URM. As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.Kinch08 wrote:Many of them probably are, I'd imagine (IDK about a majority, but I suppose it's possible). Still, if softs had no impact at all, you would be able to predict success based on URM status and numbers alone; we have more than enough evidence from LSN etc. to determine that we can't do that.CHyde wrote:
Fair point. I'm curious as to how many of those below both 25ths are URM though. I'm going to assume...a majority.
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Reverse splitter, applied Jan, offered JS1 last weekappind wrote:can you share stats, dates?LHS17 wrote:
Me as well
- hydrohect

- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 6:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
appind wrote:I suspect there is no non-urm js1 that has both numbers below 25 percentile?
LSAT<25 & GPA=25, non-URM here. JS1 late January.mrgstephe wrote:As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Tiffany is that you?patrickkpaul wrote:appind wrote:I suspect there is no non-urm js1 that has both numbers below 25 percentile?LSAT<25 & GPA=25, non-URM here. JS1 late January.mrgstephe wrote:As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.
- hydrohect

- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 6:50 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Rigo wrote:Tiffany is that you?patrickkpaul wrote:appind wrote:I suspect there is no non-urm js1 that has both numbers below 25 percentile?LSAT<25 & GPA=25, non-URM here. JS1 late January.mrgstephe wrote:As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.
-
goldenbear2020

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:47 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Lol she would have gotten a combo JS1/JS2 in mid-November.Rigo wrote:Tiffany is that you?patrickkpaul wrote:appind wrote:I suspect there is no non-urm js1 that has both numbers below 25 percentile?LSAT<25 & GPA=25, non-URM here. JS1 late January.mrgstephe wrote:As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I don't think TT has been accepted yet honestlygoldenbear2020 wrote:Lol she would have gotten a combo JS1/JS2 in mid-November.Rigo wrote:Tiffany is that you?patrickkpaul wrote:appind wrote:I suspect there is no non-urm js1 that has both numbers below 25 percentile?LSAT<25 & GPA=25, non-URM here. JS1 late January.mrgstephe wrote:As of this point in the thread, only 1 non-URM has reported even getting an interview with <25th LSAT.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login