One of the is lowercase, the other is not! I do not know the significance of that. Nothing has changed on the app checker. I'll let you guys know when I get the stuff in the mail? I know some people might not believe me, but I swear I'm not cruel enough to prank anyone like this. That would be ridiculously unkind.twentypercentmore wrote:Well damn. Time to hit refresh on the status checker over and over.
Did your email go lowercase on the status checker?
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- winenot

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
- winenot

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
RE: question about softs. I don't really know how to judge their strength. I do things on campus??? I really don't know how they are judged and I am sure it differs by school and by people. I am borderline incoherent right now, so apologies if I cannot answer questions perfectly! Ahhhh.
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Incoherent with good reason. +1 for the appropriate avatar. Try not to die from alcohol poisoning or get arrested during your drunken stupor. congrats!!!winenot wrote:RE: question about softs. I don't really know how to judge their strength. I do things on campus??? I really don't know how they are judged and I am sure it differs by school and by people. I am borderline incoherent right now, so apologies if I cannot answer questions perfectly! Ahhhh.
- winenot

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I will not be doing anything illegal! My celebration will be me hugging it out with friends and probably eating cake. Lots and lots of cake.t-14orbust wrote:Incoherent with good reason. +1 for the appropriate avatar. Try not to die from alcohol poisoning or get arrested during your drunken stupor. congrats!!!winenot wrote:RE: question about softs. I don't really know how to judge their strength. I do things on campus??? I really don't know how they are judged and I am sure it differs by school and by people. I am borderline incoherent right now, so apologies if I cannot answer questions perfectly! Ahhhh.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
According my mylsn the last time Stanford released a November decision it was in 2005-2006 cycle. Those were released on Nov 21, 22, and 23. So Winenot, you may have set the all-time record!
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Winenot is a legend. I already told my friends about you
- CitrusFruit

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Whaaaaaaat! I need to know more about this! Did she say she was calling others?!
- HarvardHopeful

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1 lolt-14orbust wrote:Winenot is a legend. I already told my friends about you
- winenot

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh my god.The-Specs wrote:According my mylsn the last time Stanford released a November decision it was in 2005-2006 cycle. Those were released on Nov 21, 22, and 23. So Winenot, you may have set the all-time record!
- CitrusFruit

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Crazy. Is it your #1 school?winenot wrote:Oh my god.The-Specs wrote:According my mylsn the last time Stanford released a November decision it was in 2005-2006 cycle. Those were released on Nov 21, 22, and 23. So Winenot, you may have set the all-time record!
- winenot

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
She didn't mention she was calling others, but I was also in too much of a daze to do much other than thank her profusely and exclaim "oh my gosh". If this was a test of my ability to be articulate under moments of extreme emotion, I most certainly failed.CitrusFruit wrote:Whaaaaaaat! I need to know more about this! Did she say she was calling others?!
- CitrusFruit

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Wow. That's insane. I suppose september submitters should be on high alert from now on. Congrats though, that's amazing.winenot wrote:She didn't mention she was calling others, but I was also in too much of a daze to do much other than thank her profusely and exclaim "oh my gosh". If this was a test of my ability to be articulate under moments of extreme emotion, I most certainly failed.CitrusFruit wrote:Whaaaaaaat! I need to know more about this! Did she say she was calling others?!
- twenty

- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Okay, same as last year then. Thanks.One of the is lowercase, the other is not! I do not know the significance of that.
-
NapoleonXV

- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I wonder if this is of any significance.twentypercentmore wrote:Okay, same as last year then. Thanks.One of the is lowercase, the other is not! I do not know the significance of that.
Mine has been one upper case and one lower case since submission.
- CitrusFruit

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Wait, what? Email addresses? You mean the 2 email addresses that are listed as primary and secondary? Because I have one caps and one lowercase but they have been that way all along, I think.twentypercentmore wrote:Okay, same as last year then. Thanks.One of the is lowercase, the other is not! I do not know the significance of that.
- twenty

- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Huh. Both of mine are upper-case, and I know I didn't type it in upper-case.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Same here.twentypercentmore wrote:Huh. Both of mine are upper-case, and I know I didn't type it in upper-case.
- CitrusFruit

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm not positive mine have always been this way, but I'm pretty sure....I also submitted under a month ago, so I doubt it means anything. They probably haven't reviewed my app yet.drawstring wrote:Same here.twentypercentmore wrote:Huh. Both of mine are upper-case, and I know I didn't type it in upper-case.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I don''t know if it matters, but my primary and secondary are the same email.
I submitted on Oct 28
I submitted on Oct 28
- CitrusFruit

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
okay, mine are not. that might be whydrawstring wrote:I don''t know if it matters, but my primary and secondary are the same email.
I submitted on Oct 28
- turtles

- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol everyone's phone is on max volume right now
-
Slt10T

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Just got the call!! Stanford 2017!
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Congrats!!!
When did you submit?
When did you submit?
-
Slt10T

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 4:13 pm
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
congrats!!!Slt10T wrote:Just got the call!! Stanford 2017!