
Here is a kitten to cheer up this thread.
were you in state?moshid wrote:e-mail. feel free to ask me anything elsecch24 wrote:Can I ask how you found out? You don't have to answer if it's too personal.moshid wrote:rejected. reverse splitter above 75th GPA below 25th LSAT
paul34 wrote:Do you think that if I e-mail it as an addendum to my application they'll let me in?gaud wrote:how can one not smile at such a cute picture lol
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
QFredditoutsidethescope wrote:
Here is a kitten to cheer up this thread.
gavinstevens wrote:I second this. I was faced with a similar situation and submitted with one LOR.msblaw89 wrote:I would go ahead and apply now. Chances are they won't begin to even look at your application for at least 3 weeks after you submit you application. You should have plenty of time to get the LOR in your file before they review it.dkb17xzx wrote:I need advice:
Texas is my #1 choice (below the median by a hair, but above the 25th / TX resident). I have already secured one letter of recommendation from a professor, and am currently waiting on another one. I really want to send in both letters because I know they will both be good and boost my mediocre numbers. Problem is I'm not quite sure when the letter will come in (my bet is sometime after Thanksgiving break). Should I wait? Or just send it in? Is there any chance that Texas will consider my second letter if it arrives a week or two after my completed application?
I'm sorry beezy! Hang in there!beezy08 wrote:Got the dreaded rejection email this morning. It was pretty much expected though, so no worries. Good luck to everyone else!
Darn, that's surprising.stingray wrote:rejected via email 167 3.74
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Probably so, though I don't think they're considered a traditional T-14 yet. You got into a real T-14 in Cornell. Congrats!Cartman wrote:Rejected via email today (11/18). Applied ED 10/05, 169/3.31. Bummer. I did get in to Cornell already though, so I'm really not too worried
Unfortunately I think that UT Austin's trying to hold onto their new found coveted T-14 status, and I doubt this will bode well for us border-liners.
GL all!
Good question. I thought most law schools were closed on Saturdayssarahmargie wrote:Why are they doing rejections on Saturday?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
This does not bode well for me......Cartman wrote:Rejected via email today (11/18). Applied ED 10/05, 169/3.31. Bummer. I did get in to Cornell already though, so I'm really not too worried
Unfortunately I think that UT Austin's trying to hold onto their new found coveted T-14 status, and I doubt this will bode well for us border-liners.
GL all!
Yeah.....I'm worried Texas might raise their medians this cycle.....they've been reporting that apps are up 15 percent..... 167/3.74 seems like it would've been a lock last cycle....gavinstevens wrote:Darn, that's surprising.stingray wrote:rejected via email 167 3.74
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Not good news for most of us, but a good point.advocate1 wrote:Here is my issue with the apps up 15% discussion. It would seem to me that due to the in state requirements that you could view the admissions process as having two groups. There are a certain amount of in state spots and TX applicants are competing for those. Then there is the out of state applicant competing for the other seats.
It would seem that the 15% increase would mostly be coming from out of state applicants. They have seen the low COL and good job prospects in TX (not to mention the general awesomness of the state) plus the USNWR rating bump. I know very few TX residents that don't apply to TX. I mean in state is like a huge automatic scholarship.
So I would think that for out of state it is going to be harder to get in this year. In state perhaps a little bit harder but not really exceedingly different from last year.
said as an in-stater who is hoping beyond hope that this is true! Who knows, I could be way off and all of TX has decided to go to law school this year.gavinstevens wrote:Not good news for most of us, but a good point.advocate1 wrote:Here is my issue with the apps up 15% discussion. It would seem to me that due to the in state requirements that you could view the admissions process as having two groups. There are a certain amount of in state spots and TX applicants are competing for those. Then there is the out of state applicant competing for the other seats.
It would seem that the 15% increase would mostly be coming from out of state applicants. They have seen the low COL and good job prospects in TX (not to mention the general awesomness of the state) plus the USNWR rating bump. I know very few TX residents that don't apply to TX. I mean in state is like a huge automatic scholarship.
So I would think that for out of state it is going to be harder to get in this year. In state perhaps a little bit harder but not really exceedingly different from last year.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login