Ha, well if it makes you feel better we probably won't be hearing back until April anyways123kl wrote:sooo scared.Knock wrote: 4 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
.

Ha, well if it makes you feel better we probably won't be hearing back until April anyways123kl wrote:sooo scared.Knock wrote: 4 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
.
Hah. Probably true. I'll get my WL/rejection then.Knock wrote:Ha, well if it makes you feel better we probably won't be hearing back until April anyways123kl wrote:sooo scared.Knock wrote: 4 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
.
See the decision date graph in the original post of this thread.HopefulFish wrote:Does anybody know if anyone has received a rejection letter yet? Or when Stanford usually sends out the ding mails?
Been under review since early October.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
According to that graph, some folks should have been admitted by now (Nov/Dec). Why is it that none have gotten in thus far?Knock wrote:See the decision date graph in the original post of this thread.HopefulFish wrote:Does anybody know if anyone has received a rejection letter yet? Or when Stanford usually sends out the ding mails?
Been under review since early October.
Probably because of Dean Deal's family emergency in late October.HopefulFish wrote:According to that graph, some folks should have been admitted by now (Nov/Dec). Why is it that none have gotten in thus far?Knock wrote:See the decision date graph in the original post of this thread.HopefulFish wrote:Does anybody know if anyone has received a rejection letter yet? Or when Stanford usually sends out the ding mails?
Been under review since early October.
I don't think so. Last year first acceptances came on the second friday in December.HopefulFish wrote:According to that graph, some folks should have been admitted by now (Nov/Dec). Why is it that none have gotten in thus far?Knock wrote:See the decision date graph in the original post of this thread.HopefulFish wrote:Does anybody know if anyone has received a rejection letter yet? Or when Stanford usually sends out the ding mails?
Been under review since early October.
When did you submit? how long does take from submit to complete?Dwigt wrote:Just went complete. Stanford was the last school I applied to (took my recommenders a long time to write Stanford-specific recommnedations), but that might be a good thing as I think I submitted a very solid application.
And now the waiting game begins...I hope going complete late doesn't make me an auto-ding - it's pretty much a shot in the dark as it is!
Knock wrote:I don't think so. Last year first acceptances came on the second friday in December.HopefulFish wrote:According to that graph, some folks should have been admitted by now (Nov/Dec). Why is it that none have gotten in thus far?Knock wrote:See the decision date graph in the original post of this thread.HopefulFish wrote:Does anybody know if anyone has received a rejection letter yet? Or when Stanford usually sends out the ding mails?
Been under review since early October.
TLS graph is for illustration purpose onlyLilMonsterAnnie wrote: Knock, then if what you state is true, WHY does the TLS graphs show mid November as the first acceptances coming out?
I submitted in November but my LORs were just processed by LSAC last weeklkk wrote:When did you submit? how long does take from submit to complete?Dwigt wrote:Just went complete. Stanford was the last school I applied to (took my recommenders a long time to write Stanford-specific recommnedations), but that might be a good thing as I think I submitted a very solid application.
And now the waiting game begins...I hope going complete late doesn't make me an auto-ding - it's pretty much a shot in the dark as it is!
the waiting is so hard!
It doesn't. It goes by weeks. So locate "Dec4" (4th week of December) on the graph. Move two to the left to the second mark (2nd week of December) and that is where the "big wave" of acceptances went out; which is consistent with the data from last year's thread.LilMonsterAnnie wrote:Knock wrote:I don't think so. Last year first acceptances came on the second friday in December.HopefulFish wrote:According to that graph, some folks should have been admitted by now (Nov/Dec). Why is it that none have gotten in thus far?Knock wrote:
See the decision date graph in the original post of this thread.
Knock, then if what you state is true, WHY does the TLS graphs show mid November as the first acceptances coming out?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
@Knock: Ahem...Knock wrote:Knock wrote:4 days until possible first acceptancesKnock wrote:5 days until possible first acceptances.Knock wrote:
6 days until possible first acceptances..
![]()
.
![]()
![]()
.
3 days until possible first acceptancesTeflon1974 wrote:@Knock: Ahem...Knock wrote:Knock wrote:4 days until possible first acceptancesKnock wrote: 5 days until possible first acceptances.![]()
.
![]()
![]()
.
Watch you get the first call here.Knock wrote:
3 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Every good athlete knows you don't change stuff in the middle of your game. Knock almost screwed it all up.r6_philly wrote:Watch you get the first call here.Knock wrote:
3 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Haha, that's definitely not happening. But if it somehow does, I may have a heart attackr6_philly wrote:Watch you get the first call here.Knock wrote:
3 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
![]()
.
+1 phew. It's like i'm throwing a _______. You just don't talk about throwing a ______, and you leave the pitcher aloneTeflon1974 wrote:Every good athlete knows you don't change stuff in the middle of your game. Knock almost screwed it all up.r6_philly wrote:Watch you get the first call here.Knock wrote:
3 days until possible first acceptances![]()
![]()
![]()
.
The graph starts at Dec 1st week which is 0. The next point is Dec 2nd week with 9, so the green line draws from 0 to 9.LilMonsterAnnie wrote: So I am not seeing what you are seeing. the way I am reading it is acceptances began the week after Thanksgiving and then ran through December 4th
<http://www.top-law-schools.com/images/d ... anford.jpg>
maybe I am not able to click on something that you see...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Yeah those graphs are amazingly terrible... Also, I wouldnt count on too many people hearing back from Stanford this friday. Arent they notorious for April decisions??r6_philly wrote:The graph starts at Dec 1st week which is 0. The next point is Dec 2nd week with 9, so the green line draws from 0 to 9.LilMonsterAnnie wrote: So I am not seeing what you are seeing. the way I am reading it is acceptances began the week after Thanksgiving and then ran through December 4th
<http://www.top-law-schools.com/images/d ... anford.jpg>
maybe I am not able to click on something that you see...
The graphs are crappy. they should have used bar graphs instead of line, there is no reason to connect the dots. So it should be, week by week starting from Dec 1(st week): 9 - 8 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 3 (Jan 2nd week) - etc...
I thought people got off WL too? My numbers are not strong, so if my file doesn't convince them to accept up front I don't think I stand as good of a chance later.tkgrrett wrote:
Yeah those graphs are amazingly terrible... Also, I wouldnt count on too many people hearing back from Stanford this friday. Arent they notorious for April decisions??
Let the cycle deflating let-down commence!!ela7117 wrote:New blog post by dean Faye , phone calls shall commence shortly.
http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admission ... it-begins/
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login