You held too Charlie?charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle) Forum
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
- NicCageOnline

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:36 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Can I clarify: Is "hold" Columbia's term for a waitlist? Is it essentially the same thing? Having to submit LOCI's by a certain date seems pretty waitlist-y. Sorry for those to whom this has happened! :/
- paglababa

- Posts: 888
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
This. I'm not sure if I should mention anything about other acceptances if this is truely YP.charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
-
wetbandit

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Also held.
Last edited by wetbandit on Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- charlie.black

- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Safe for the moment. No clue what's going on...been complete for ages.The-Specs wrote:You held too Charlie?charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
EquallyWrong

- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
maybe it's a let's see who withdraws and takes themselves out of contention because we've hit a brick wall? it still seems pretty up in that air as to what people being held can realistically expect to get. Obviously, they weren't held because their numbers didn't cut it...so maybe this is a let's see if you are serious or currently planning to go elsewhere anyway.charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
-
linkx13

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:27 pm
- Lightworks

- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:15 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
My last 4 emails:
W/L Duke
Rejected at Berkeley
W/L Penn
Held at Columbia
Been a brutal week.
W/L Duke
Rejected at Berkeley
W/L Penn
Held at Columbia
Been a brutal week.
-
teenybean

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Also held. Around 25%lsat and 3.9x gpa.
Is the consensus that this is better than a reserve?
- OMAR_COMIN_YO

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:10 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
EquallyWrong wrote:maybe it's a let's see who withdraws and takes themselves out of contention because we've hit a brick wall? it still seems pretty up in that air as to what people being held can realistically expect to get. Obviously, they weren't held because their numbers didn't cut it...so maybe this is a let's see if you are serious or currently planning to go elsewhere anyway.charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
This seems pretty likely considering all of the high level candidates who have been held.
-
ifiknew

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I think that's probably what it is, see who withdraws. Also held. <25% GPA >75% LSAT.EquallyWrong wrote:maybe it's a let's see who withdraws and takes themselves out of contention because we've hit a brick wall? it still seems pretty up in that air as to what people being held can realistically expect to get. Obviously, they weren't held because their numbers didn't cut it...so maybe this is a let's see if you are serious or currently planning to go elsewhere anyway.charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Damn a lot of good people being held. I'm with one of the previous posters, I think schools are just freaked out and taking longer to decide. This si their way of stalling. But it may backfire. They might just force a lot of people to withdraw and be screwed.
-
aena

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Can we discuss the difference between "held" and "reserve."
I've discovered from LSN that some people with the same numbers and the same complete dates as me were straight put on reserve while I was put on hold.
I've discovered from LSN that some people with the same numbers and the same complete dates as me were straight put on reserve while I was put on hold.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- NicCageOnline

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:36 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
This. I'm also curious about this. (see my earlier post)aena wrote:Can we discuss the difference between "held" and "reserve."
I've discovered from LSN that some people with the same numbers and the same complete dates as me were straight put on reserve while I was put on hold.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Reserve is WL, hold is "we haven't decided on you yet, hang tight."aena wrote:Can we discuss the difference between "held" and "reserve."
I've discovered from LSN that some people with the same numbers and the same complete dates as me were straight put on reserve while I was put on hold.
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I don't think they'll be screwed, columbia's class size is like 200 people less than HLS no?lawschool22 wrote:Damn a lot of good people being held. I'm with one of the previous posters, I think schools are just freaked out and taking longer to decide. This si their way of stalling. But it may backfire. They might just force a lot of people to withdraw and be screwed.
- bombaysippin

- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Held today as well 
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
lakers180

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 7:11 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
so if thats true what the difference between being held and being a early submit who just hasn't heard anythinglawschool22 wrote:Reserve is WL, hold is "we haven't decided on you yet, hang tight."aena wrote:Can we discuss the difference between "held" and "reserve."
I've discovered from LSN that some people with the same numbers and the same complete dates as me were straight put on reserve while I was put on hold.
like why dont they just tell you when they decide instead of saying they havent decided
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yeah, but there aren't that many 171+ people. Once you subtract all the 171+ who are going to throw down deposits at HYS, Chicago, NYU, other T14's with serious money, Columbia will have a bit of trouble if they wait forever to pounce on these candidates.Gary wrote:I don't think they'll be screwed, columbia's class size is like 200 people less than HLS no?lawschool22 wrote:Damn a lot of good people being held. I'm with one of the previous posters, I think schools are just freaked out and taking longer to decide. This si their way of stalling. But it may backfire. They might just force a lot of people to withdraw and be screwed.
-
Chekhov'sGun

- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 2:43 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Might be a mix of YP and regular WL or maybe I'm just an outlier... Held with 25%<LSAT<50% and GPA at 50%.OMAR_COMIN_YO wrote:EquallyWrong wrote:maybe it's a let's see who withdraws and takes themselves out of contention because we've hit a brick wall? it still seems pretty up in that air as to what people being held can realistically expect to get. Obviously, they weren't held because their numbers didn't cut it...so maybe this is a let's see if you are serious or currently planning to go elsewhere anyway.charlie.black wrote:is this a sort of "you're strong enough for HYS, but we don't want to pay to pull you away" sort of yield protect?
This seems pretty likely considering all of the high level candidates who have been held.
-
EquallyWrong

- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I think a held status is revocable anytime they feel like changing their mind, it doesn't seem to carry with it any substantial or intelligible judgement whereas a wait list is a process in itself that is saved until April or May for further review. One signals they may or may not need you to fill up the last few places in their incoming class, the other is just kicking the can to an undetermined point down the road and may just amount to a minor annoyance for the applicant. I don't know if that helps.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- paglababa

- Posts: 888
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:34 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I submitted my LOCI already. I'm ready for this. Bring it on Columbia. Please bring it on with $75k+ though.
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I hear what you're saying. Hopefully they know what they're doing... Good luck to you man, hope you get that envelope soon!lawschool22 wrote:Yeah, but there aren't that many 171+ people. Once you subtract all the 171+ who are going to throw down deposits at HYS, Chicago, NYU, other T14's with serious money, Columbia will have a bit of trouble if they wait forever to pounce on these candidates.Gary wrote:I don't think they'll be screwed, columbia's class size is like 200 people less than HLS no?lawschool22 wrote:Damn a lot of good people being held. I'm with one of the previous posters, I think schools are just freaked out and taking longer to decide. This si their way of stalling. But it may backfire. They might just force a lot of people to withdraw and be screwed.
- bombaysippin

- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
People writing LOCIs, are you guys/gals doing like a "why x" or can it be as simple as expressing your continued interest?
-
thestatusguo

- Posts: 148
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:06 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Held. Below median LSAT, above 75th GPA.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login