+1Integrity wrote:Dear WUSTL, please accept this punctilious reverse splitter who has shown consistent interest since October!
LOL...what is their reputation with reverse splitters anyway? I know they love splitters.
* edited for quotation fail
+1Integrity wrote:Dear WUSTL, please accept this punctilious reverse splitter who has shown consistent interest since October!
LOL...what is their reputation with reverse splitters anyway? I know they love splitters.
WUSTL loves reverse splitters if you have at least a 163 and a 3.7/3.8+Integrity wrote:Dear WUSTL, please accept this punctilious reverse splitter who has shown consistent interest since October!
LOL...what is their reputation with reverse splitters anyway? I know they love splitters.
I'm a more severe reverse splitter: 4.0/158...is that WL love at best?JCougar wrote:WUSTL loves reverse splitters if you have at least a 163 and a 3.7/3.8+Integrity wrote:Dear WUSTL, please accept this punctilious reverse splitter who has shown consistent interest since October!
LOL...what is their reputation with reverse splitters anyway? I know they love splitters.
you're still waiting from WUSTL? I don't think you need to worry about them being sketchy - they're super behind as is everyone else, and it's really the luck of the draw as to when they get to your application. That scholarship at Illinois is really great though... you should wait and see how much WashU gives you. I know my SIL award is string-free.kdw94780 wrote:Now, I really like WUSTL for personal reasons; their recent rankings rise also intrigues me as well as the mystery SIL award.
However, I am starting to really favor Illinois at this matter because yeah they did notify me of 40k/yr guaranteed for all 3 years in my acceptance letter. They haven't been playing games like WUSTL. Furthermore, their flash drive for 4 GB vs 1 GB for WUSTL....I really wish WUSTL admissions was more like Illinois.
the new rankings came out?! when ?? link please?kdw94780 wrote:Now, I really like WUSTL for personal reasons; their recent rankings rise also intrigues me as well as the mystery SIL award.
no. will be published in april.MissLucky wrote:the new rankings came out?! when ?? link please?kdw94780 wrote:Now, I really like WUSTL for personal reasons; their recent rankings rise also intrigues me as well as the mystery SIL award.
Well, tuition is 43k/year. COL has been estimated at 19k(ish). I, peronsally, have been planning around 60-63k/year, and I think it's a fairly accurate estimate. God I hope they throw some cash my way.... that's scary.I saw that a while back someone threw down 55k as the estimated yearly cost of attendance for WUSTL. This seems pretty low to me. Does anyone care to share a more accurate/current figure?
Probably the wrong thread (biased), but what does everyone think WUSTL will be at this year?fl0w wrote:no. will be published in april.MissLucky wrote:the new rankings came out?! when ?? link please?kdw94780 wrote:Now, I really like WUSTL for personal reasons; their recent rankings rise also intrigues me as well as the mystery SIL award.
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/college-ran ... kings.html
ME!has anyone made the 1st deposit yet ?
I'm interested to see if the negative publicity moves Texas down.mazzini wrote:ME!has anyone made the 1st deposit yet ?
Also, regarding WUSTL rankings this year I think that they will remain in the same slot (19). I don't see Emory or Minnesota beating them out, nor do I see them overcoming USC. but anything can happen.
HBK wrote:I'm interested to see if the negative publicity moves Texas down.mazzini wrote:ME!has anyone made the 1st deposit yet ?
Also, regarding WUSTL rankings this year I think that they will remain in the same slot (19). I don't see Emory or Minnesota beating them out, nor do I see them overcoming USC. but anything can happen.
anyone have the cojones to call and ask?texaspecial88 wrote:Do we think the 3/23ers will hear back today?
it looks that way. but it also seems we're also grouped with below LSAT median URMs. good or bad for us non-URMs?keemos wrote:from what I read the past day most of us are below LSAT median