Post removed. Forum

patfeeney · Post by **patfeeney** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:28 pm

Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh

kenwash · Post by **kenwash** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:42 pm

patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh

+1

vuthy · Post by **vuthy** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:44 pm

kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1

Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?

Gungnir · Post by **Gungnir** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:48 pm

vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?

Hrmm, I'm still 1/17. f5f5f5

fatheranderson15 · Post by **fatheranderson15** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:49 pm

vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?

I'm a splitter in the 1/17 group but they haven't moved me to UR2. Keep hoping it'll change when I log in.

patfeeney · Post by **patfeeney** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:53 pm

vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?

174/3.6

Serett · Post by **Serett** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:57 pm

vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?

Not to extinguish any subsequent attempts to eke out a trend from this question, but I'm a (mild) splitter and went 1/17 - 2/6. I'm between 25th-50th GPA (and was actually below the 25th when the UR2 occurred, and only my recently updated/corrected transcript pushes me above it) and 50th-75th LSAT. Still, I have no idea if it bodes ill or well, and I'm not confident due to a few theories individuals have been floating around the thread that Penn is generally taking 169 LSATs and high GPAs over splitters.

rigoding · Post by **rigoding** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:58 pm

fatheranderson15 wrote:
vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?
I'm a splitter in the 1/17 group but they haven't moved me to UR2. Keep hoping it'll change when I log in.

I'm a 1/17 UR1 splitter too. No movement yet...

vuthy · Post by **vuthy** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:16 pm

Serett wrote:
Not to extinguish any subsequent attempts to eke out a trend from this question, but I'm a (mild) splitter and went 1/17 - 2/6. I'm between 25th-50th GPA (and was actually below the 25th when the UR2 occurred, and only my recently updated/corrected transcript pushes me above it) and 50th-75th LSAT. Still, I have no idea if it bodes ill or well, and I'm not confident due to a few theories individuals have been floating around the thread that Penn is generally taking 169 LSATs and high GPAs over splitters.

Interesting. Here's one that got through: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/tville10

BerkeleyMan5 · Post by **BerkeleyMan5** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:40 pm

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:41 pm

BerkeleyMan5 wrote:Hey all, 3.9x and 170. I don't know if that's reverse splitter status??? But I'm also UR 2/14 with you all.

You're above both medians, not a splitter at all.

BerkeleyMan5 · Post by **BerkeleyMan5** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:44 pm

Arrow4Christ · Post by **Arrow4Christ** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 6:05 pm

UR1 2/7 ---> UR2 2/14

Not sure what to make of that...

hweigel · Post by **hweigel** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 7:09 pm

Weird, I'm still at UR1 2/7...

yossarian · Post by **yossarian** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 7:11 pm

vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?

I got left behind. More a less a splitter, but my LSAT isn't super high.

anna8506 · Post by **anna8506** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:40 pm

hweigel wrote:Weird, I'm still at UR1 2/7...

me too

BerkeleyMan5 · Post by **BerkeleyMan5** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:44 pm

Tariffs · Post by **Tariffs** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:25 pm

2/4 UR2 still nothing. Isn't the turnaround usually quicker than this?

patfeeney · Post by **patfeeney** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:51 pm

yossarian71 wrote:
vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?
I got left behind. More a less a splitter, but my LSAT isn't super high.

Consensus is that we will be part of the next ding/ WL wave? Or did we survive the last one and perhaps we're the lucky few splitters?

drevo · Post by **drevo** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:53 pm

patfeeney wrote:
vuthy wrote:
kenwash wrote:
patfeeney wrote:Just went 1/17 - 2/14. Uuugh
+1
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?
174/3.6

I'm another 1/17 --> 2/14 and my numbers are nearly the same as these FWIW.

kenwash · Post by **kenwash** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:11 pm

patfeeney wrote:
Consensus is that we will be part of the next ding/ WL wave? Or did we survive the last one and perhaps we're the lucky few splitters?

We just had a small acceptance wave with 1/17 UR1 people, so I'm not super hopeful

CookieDough · Post by **CookieDough** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:26 pm

Arrow4Christ wrote:UR1 2/7 ---> UR2 2/14 Not sure what to make of that...

This makes me feel a little better. Same dates and I was concerned about the quick movement!

yossarian · Post by **yossarian** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:56 pm

patfeeney wrote:
yossarian71 wrote:
vuthy wrote:
Looks like all of us in that 1/17 passed-over group are now UR2. Are we all splitters, more or less?
I got left behind. More a less a splitter, but my LSAT isn't super high.
Consensus is that we will be part of the next ding/ WL wave? Or did we survive the last one and perhaps we're the lucky few splitters?

I don't know. I was indicating I'm still UR1 1/17. Sorry, wasn't super clear. My thoughts are they moved potential WL people forward while leaving dings behind.

Theopliske8711 · Post by **Theopliske8711** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:20 pm

Still 1/17

checkin2014 · Post by **checkin2014** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:42 pm

hweigel wrote:Weird, I'm still at UR1 2/7...

+1

Post removed. Forum

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Register for access!

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Register now!

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?