TITCRfinalaspects wrote:im just staring at my list of the DFers... thinking it can't be rejections but probably is... sighOneKnight wrote:...as the waves of optimism and pessimism continue to roll in...
and i need to wait a couple of days at least to find out...
USC 2010! Forum
- OneKnight
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: USC 2010!
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
DF 4/27
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
166/3.67
166/3.53
165/4.0
165/3.6
165/3.3
Median: 166/3.53 (USC median: 167/3.6)
URM:
163/3.45
161/3.1
160/3.6
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
166/3.67
166/3.53
165/4.0
165/3.6
165/3.3
Median: 166/3.53 (USC median: 167/3.6)
URM:
163/3.45
161/3.1
160/3.6
- JolieSaraLee
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Hmmm that looks good but it's BARELY below median. I have been looking at this board all day alternating between hope and disappointment....Hopefully tomorrow we'll know some definite answers.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
DF 4/27
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.98 (from LSN)
166/3.73
166/3.67
166/3.53
165/4.0
165/3.6
165/3.3
Updated Median: 166/3.6 (USC median: 167/3.6)
URM:
163/3.45
161/3.1
160/3.6
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.98 (from LSN)
166/3.73
166/3.67
166/3.53
165/4.0
165/3.6
165/3.3
Updated Median: 166/3.6 (USC median: 167/3.6)
URM:
163/3.45
161/3.1
160/3.6
- iceskater1620
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: USC 2010!
With numbers that close to the median...it doesn't seem like all of these would be rejects. At the very least, I'd expect most of these people to be waitlisted, right? So, it really seems like this could be a mixed batch (if that's even possible) or accepts.
This is driving me nuts! I can't do my schoolwork...I just keep refreshing this thread.
This is driving me nuts! I can't do my schoolwork...I just keep refreshing this thread.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
if they already have enough people that are waitlisted with similar stats, they might not need any more so it can easily be all rejections. and i highly doubt its a mixed batch since none were mixed so far but you never know....iceskater1620 wrote:With numbers that close to the median...it doesn't seem like all of these would be rejects. At the very least, I'd expect most of these people to be waitlisted, right? So, it really seems like this could be a mixed batch (if that's even possible) or accepts.
This is driving me nuts! I can't do my schoolwork...I just keep refreshing this thread.
Last edited by finalaspects on Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JolieSaraLee
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
WET BLANKET!finalaspects wrote:if they already have enough people that are waitlisted with similar stats, they might not need any more so it can easily be all rejections.iceskater1620 wrote:With numbers that close to the median...it doesn't seem like all of these would be rejects. At the very least, I'd expect most of these people to be waitlisted, right? So, it really seems like this could be a mixed batch (if that's even possible) or accepts.
This is driving me nuts! I can't do my schoolwork...I just keep refreshing this thread.

-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
sorry... but im on the same boat you are.JolieSaraLee wrote: WET BLANKET!

- JolieSaraLee
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I know. Better to expect the worst I guess. I wonder if the decision letters are all still small, regardless of the decision....finalaspects wrote:sorry... but im on the same boat you are.JolieSaraLee wrote: WET BLANKET!
- Ryou
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Hate to bring the numbers down but DF 4/27 with 164/3.6
Decent softs I think (got on the Vandy WL + Faculty Review @ Boalt), but I don't think I'm a URM for USC (Asian)
Decent softs I think (got on the Vandy WL + Faculty Review @ Boalt), but I don't think I'm a URM for USC (Asian)
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
you're still at median for GPA, and that WL + Faculty review means you should have decent softs like you stated. and yea im asian and there is no chance we're URM.Ryou wrote:Hate to bring the numbers down but DF 4/27 with 164/3.6
Decent softs I think (got on the Vandy WL + Faculty Review @ Boalt), but I don't think I'm a URM for USC (Asian)
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
DF 4/27
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.98 (from LSN)
166/3.73
166/3.67
166/3.53
165/4.0
165/3.6
165/3.3
164/3.6
Updated Median: 166/3.6 (USC median: 167/3.6)
URM:
163/3.45
161/3.1
160/3.6
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.98 (from LSN)
166/3.73
166/3.67
166/3.53
165/4.0
165/3.6
165/3.3
164/3.6
Updated Median: 166/3.6 (USC median: 167/3.6)
URM:
163/3.45
161/3.1
160/3.6
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:49 pm
Re: USC 2010!
167/3.8 still IR as of mid-February. Do you all think they just lost my application? Should I just keep waiting? I keep checking my application and no obvious red flags.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:33 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I think you and I are in the same boat. My guess is (or at least my hope) it's some kind of "hold" status. I would be very surprised if we don't hear back by Friday or Monday at the latest, and I tend to believe it will be positive (depending on how many actually deposit vs. how many withdraw)... then again, with the way this cycle has gone, who can really say for sure?Jockin Jay-Z wrote:167/3.8 still IR as of mid-February. Do you all think they just lost my application? Should I just keep waiting? I keep checking my application and no obvious red flags.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
hmm you can call and ask if you're really curious, but i doubt they lost it.Jockin Jay-Z wrote:167/3.8 still IR as of mid-February. Do you all think they just lost my application? Should I just keep waiting? I keep checking my application and no obvious red flags.
the question is why did we go DF without people with your stats. your stats should make you an auto-admit. you and jman77.
ok i think i have now convinced myself that this is a rejection. i shall stop checking this thread so often.

- Matteliszt
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I think Ryou and I are kind of at the same place in our cycle - we both got WL at Vandy. I kinda wouldn't be surprised if we both got WLed at USC but it seems like DF means its either reject/accept, so I have NO idea.
- burtonrideclub
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:10 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I went from complete 11/23 to DF 4/27, holistic my ass. Already posted my stats, but 166 3.53.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
are you an URM? you might regret saying that if you're accepted, but we probably won't be so all the power to you.burtonrideclub wrote:I went from complete 11/23 to DF 4/27, holistic my ass. Already posted my stats, but 166 3.53.
-
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I was Complete from 10/22 until In review 4/22 - then DF 4/27. I highly doubt that they were so impressed with my 165 and 3.3 that they slapped me with an acceptance five days after I went into review. It's really not that uncommon for a school to use homogeneous batches during the early part of the cycle only to start sending mixed batches later.
I wouldn't go even if it was an acceptance. I'm mostly interested now because I was curious as to how long this thing would drag along.
I wouldn't go even if it was an acceptance. I'm mostly interested now because I was curious as to how long this thing would drag along.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:45 am
Re: USC 2010!
yeah, this must be a mixed accept/reject batch because some of you don't appear to have the numbers for any better than wl. hate to be a wet blanket! probably mixed because it's so close to the deposit date. fyi i found out from an accepted students web access email and i had decent softs, but i got in for my lsat no doubt. gl everybody who is still waiting!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:51 pm
Re: USC 2010!
IR since 3/26...wish they would send a rejection already and put me out of my misery 

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: USC 2010!
So those who didn't receive an email aren't acceptedTheBeholder1805 wrote:yeah, this must be a mixed accept/reject batch because some of you don't appear to have the numbers for any better than wl. hate to be a wet blanket! probably mixed because it's so close to the deposit date. fyi i found out from an accepted students web access email and i had decent softs, but i got in for my lsat no doubt. gl everybody who is still waiting!

-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
he never told us whether or not he's sure he's in DF 4/27. he stated 4/27 but i think he's mistaken as the 4/26 got emails today.txhorn wrote:So those who didn't receive an email aren't acceptedTheBeholder1805 wrote:yeah, this must be a mixed accept/reject batch because some of you don't appear to have the numbers for any better than wl. hate to be a wet blanket! probably mixed because it's so close to the deposit date. fyi i found out from an accepted students web access email and i had decent softs, but i got in for my lsat no doubt. gl everybody who is still waiting!Don't know why they wouldn't send that email all at once.
- burtonrideclub
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:10 pm
Re: USC 2010!
burtonrideclub wrote:I went from complete 11/23 to DF 4/27, holistic my ass. Already posted my stats, but 166 3.53.
Not an URM, the guy in my sig is Earl Campbell. Legendary University of Texas running back (my UG). I'm guessing thats why you might of thought I was an URM though haha.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Not realfinalaspects wrote:he never told us whether or not he's sure he's in DF 4/27. he stated 4/27 but i think he's mistaken as the 4/26 got emails today.txhorn wrote:So those who didn't receive an email aren't acceptedTheBeholder1805 wrote:yeah, this must be a mixed accept/reject batch because some of you don't appear to have the numbers for any better than wl. hate to be a wet blanket! probably mixed because it's so close to the deposit date. fyi i found out from an accepted students web access email and i had decent softs, but i got in for my lsat no doubt. gl everybody who is still waiting!Don't know why they wouldn't send that email all at once.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login