I think we will see some DLS action this afternoon/evening-if it's consistent with prior years, those DLSs will be mixed waitlist and rejections.love4life29 wrote:Yesterday they rejected some people early evening PST...maybe that will happen again. At this point I just want to know!
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
-
wheelhouse12

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I agree; I forecast a smattering of DLSs every evening for the foreseeable future.
I feel like it's good to avoid a DLS as long as possible, but it also feels like the longer I wait the less likely good news will be.
I feel like it's good to avoid a DLS as long as possible, but it also feels like the longer I wait the less likely good news will be.
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Chalupa-Batman

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The calm before the storm. Acceptances come in storms right?muzzy wrote:So today was a big goose egg? Kind of surprised.
-
EquallyWrong

- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
c'mon Stanford, where is the catharsis?
it's a wait list, of course,...or worse!
let's not be simple, this is an increasingly bad omen...
but I can't help holding on to an impossible expectation.
eck, who needs your Eden like environs and chummy entrepreneurial ubermenschen.
(to be recited with bitterness and clothing disheveled after a night of carousing: shirts half tucked and hair half mussed while a chorus of affluent and well groomed princes of the Ivy League types shake their heads in pitying disapproval)
Act II: Miraculous Acceptance featuring Stanford Dean of Admissions making congratulatory phone call in contralto to high soprano, followed by ballad in which applicant begs for continuing financial aid.
it's a wait list, of course,...or worse!
let's not be simple, this is an increasingly bad omen...
but I can't help holding on to an impossible expectation.
eck, who needs your Eden like environs and chummy entrepreneurial ubermenschen.
(to be recited with bitterness and clothing disheveled after a night of carousing: shirts half tucked and hair half mussed while a chorus of affluent and well groomed princes of the Ivy League types shake their heads in pitying disapproval)
Act II: Miraculous Acceptance featuring Stanford Dean of Admissions making congratulatory phone call in contralto to high soprano, followed by ballad in which applicant begs for continuing financial aid.
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- teampeeta

- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Maybe they're done with decisions until after ASW? I still want to believe there are some acceptances in the pipeline!
- bhs12

- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
That seems likely. I'd imagine the office is really busy right now with last minute preparations.teampeeta wrote:Maybe they're done with decisions until after ASW? I still want to believe there are some acceptances in the pipeline!
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Ryan11212

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:06 am
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
You need 100 posts first.
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Need 100 posts. You'll also need 100 posts to get into SLS. Better get on thatRyan11212 wrote:http://www.hercampus.com/sites/default/ ... k=OtUWlHHK
Also, why can't I post images...?
-
EquallyWrong

- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I don't think so, not without the climatic third act: dance of the SCOTUS clerkship.muzzy wrote:This is your LOCI, right? I think this will sew things up nicely.EquallyWrong wrote:c'mon Stanford, where is the catharsis?
it's a wait list, of course,...or worse!
let's not be simple, this is an increasingly bad omen...
but I can't help holding on to an impossible expectation.
eck, who needs your Eden like environs and chummy entrepreneurial ubermenschen.
(to be recited with bitterness and clothing disheveled after a night of carousing: shirts half tucked and hair half mussed while a chorus of affluent and well groomed princes of the Ivy League types shake their heads in pitying disapproval)
Act II: Miraculous Acceptance featuring Stanford Dean of Admissions making congratulatory phone call in contralto to high soprano, followed by ballad in which applicant begs for continuing financial aid.
- corporatebarbarian

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
"Your file has been submitted for review"

- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
OMG ME TOOcorporatebarbarian wrote:"Your file has been submitted for review"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
corporatebarbarian wrote:"Your file has been submitted for review"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Is this post srs
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
WHAT DOES IT MEAN???wtrc wrote:OMG ME TOOcorporatebarbarian wrote:"Your file has been submitted for review"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
gottago

- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Did somebody publish the LSN stats of how many people get S, given that they got H/Y/both?
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What am I missing? Isn't this the next step after complete for everyone ?wtrc wrote:OMG ME TOOcorporatebarbarian wrote:"Your file has been submitted for review"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- lastsamurai

- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
^andddddddddd we have a winnerSeoulless wrote:What am I missing? Isn't this the next step after complete for everyone ?wtrc wrote:OMG ME TOOcorporatebarbarian wrote:"Your file has been submitted for review"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The '.' at the end is taken off when you're about to be admittedSeoulless wrote:What am I missing? Isn't this the next step after complete for everyone ?wtrc wrote:OMG ME TOOcorporatebarbarian wrote:"Your file has been submitted for review"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
muzzy

- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Ryan11212

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:06 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm on it!t-14orbust wrote:Need 100 posts. You'll also need 100 posts to get into SLS. Better get on thatRyan11212 wrote:http://www.hercampus.com/sites/default/ ... k=OtUWlHHK
Also, why can't I post images...?