I'm waitlisted and I have that too. Sorry guys.staloysius wrote:Not sure if it's been there the whole time but I first noticed it after my last "Under Review" on 02/20.TheIdealist wrote:I'm wondering the same thing. I've been using a status checker android app, but I'm sure that wasn't on there before. I'm on my second UR 2/23.wishesarefishes wrote:Does everyone have a class deposit line regardless of where they are in the admission process (application complete, under review, etc.)? I have a class deposit line in the fees box directly under the application fee line. It says 0.00 for amount due.
I realize this is probably a stupid question and that I'm grasping at straws but the waiting game is making me crazy.
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:29 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I saw that on my Upenn status checker too. (waitlisted there) Well, a waitlist is still better than a rejection. Although I would love Chicago if I got in. It could be a sign of waitlist or admit. Its late in the cycle though, so its probably WL.
Edit: Are WL email or snail mail? Just wanna know where I should expect it.
Edit: Are WL email or snail mail? Just wanna know where I should expect it.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
- PopTorts13
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Highly doubt they are reviewing wait-list applications. That won't be happening until after deposits are due in mid-April. You may turn one in now but in all likelihood you are getting ahead of yourself...couldn't hurt though I suppose. But really, don't expect wait-lists to receive a ligetiment look until late April. Best of luck!WhiteGuy5 wrote:I dunno, but I figured sometime in March the earliest?luxxe wrote:When did they say they would being reviewing the WL?WhiteGuy5 wrote:I'm just sending an LOCI. Will my timing hurt me? My logic was that I should send one right before they start reviewing the waitlist pile. Bad?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm guessing that they are waiting until early May to actually admit anyone, but will start to form their priorities on the WL sooner. I mean that they would say "if we need gpas, we take kid a, then kid b, then kid c, but if we need LSATs, we take kid d, then kid e, then kid f. I think that although they don't explicitly rank applicants, and they are still a ways from making any decisions, they have or will soon start looking at people and judging them. I really don't think submitting something now is a bad call.PopTorts13 wrote:Highly doubt they are reviewing wait-list applications. That won't be happening until after deposits are due in mid-April. You may turn one in now but in all likelihood you are getting ahead of yourself...couldn't hurt though I suppose. But really, don't expect wait-lists to receive a ligetiment look until late April. Best of luck!WhiteGuy5 wrote:I dunno, but I figured sometime in March the earliest?luxxe wrote:When did they say they would being reviewing the WL?WhiteGuy5 wrote:I'm just sending an LOCI. Will my timing hurt me? My logic was that I should send one right before they start reviewing the waitlist pile. Bad?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Umm...considering they waitlisted the fuck out of everyone with a 173 and up, I think it's in their interest to look at their waitlist earlier.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yeah, I really doubt they are going to wait until late April to look at the list.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Umm...considering they waitlisted the fuck out of everyone with a 173 and up, I think it's in their interest to look at their waitlist earlier.
- luxxe
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:12 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why? They waitlist a lot of really high LSATs (with high GPAs) every year.JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I really doubt they are going to wait until late April to look at the list.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Umm...considering they waitlisted the fuck out of everyone with a 173 and up, I think it's in their interest to look at their waitlist earlier.
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well...if somebody with a 175/3.9 sent in a kick-ass LOCI pretty much saying if I get in I'll be coming, why would they risk losing that applicant to HYSC by playing dangerously close to the deposit deadline? It makes sense that they start reviewing their more attractive waitlist group sooner than later.luxxe wrote:Why? They waitlist a lot of really high LSATs (with high GPAs) every year.JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I really doubt they are going to wait until late April to look at the list.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Umm...considering they waitlisted the fuck out of everyone with a 173 and up, I think it's in their interest to look at their waitlist earlier.
Edit: stop pooping on the parade luxxe.

- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think they will actually start admitting people until May, but I do think the reviews may begin a bit earlier.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Well...if somebody with a 175/3.9 sent in a kick-ass LOCI pretty much saying if I get in I'll be coming, why would they risk losing that applicant to HYSC by playing dangerously close to the deposit deadline? It makes sense that they start reviewing their more attractive waitlist group sooner than later.luxxe wrote:Why? They waitlist a lot of really high LSATs (with high GPAs) every year.JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I really doubt they are going to wait until late April to look at the list.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Umm...considering they waitlisted the fuck out of everyone with a 173 and up, I think it's in their interest to look at their waitlist earlier.
Edit: stop pooping on the parade luxxe.
ETA: we're in the wrong thread
- ru1ess
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LMAO.. exactly.. keep it positive.. no body here really knows shit.. stop acting like experts and keep the faith.. simpleWhiteGuy5 wrote:Well...if somebody with a 175/3.9 sent in a kick-ass LOCI pretty much saying if I get in I'll be coming, why would they risk losing that applicant to HYSC by playing dangerously close to the deposit deadline? It makes sense that they start reviewing their more attractive waitlist group sooner than later.luxxe wrote:Why? They waitlist a lot of really high LSATs (with high GPAs) every year.JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I really doubt they are going to wait until late April to look at the list.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Umm...considering they waitlisted the fuck out of everyone with a 173 and up, I think it's in their interest to look at their waitlist earlier.
Edit: stop pooping on the parade luxxe.
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
FWIW, it seems that Chicago is fashioning itself as the new black box. They've cryptically dropped hints about FA decisions all week, and then they don't even send out all the aid package letters at once. I'm a December admit, and I didn't even get a FA denial email. Absolute silence, so I'm guessing they're waiting for people to turn down the money they offered yesterday before sending borderline scholly ppl (ie myself) their packages. All this to say that unsubstantiated speculation persists after admission to Chicago; they seem to have a hard-on for keeping us guessing.
- zapcaz
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hey anewaphorist! U of Chicago just posted on twitter and I thought it is relevant to your post. Sounds like you probably should contact them...anewaphorist wrote:FWIW, it seems that Chicago is fashioning itself as the new black box. They've cryptically dropped hints about FA decisions all week, and then they don't even send out all the aid package letters at once. I'm a December admit, and I didn't even get a FA denial email. Absolute silence, so I'm guessing they're waiting for people to turn down the money they offered yesterday before sending borderline scholly ppl (ie myself) their packages. All this to say that unsubstantiated speculation persists after admission to Chicago; they seem to have a hard-on for keeping us guessing.
UChicagoLawAdmission @UChicagoLawApps - All Early Decision and January admits should have received a financial aid email yesterday. If you did not, let us know.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PopTorts13
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't know any special information, just an educated guess. Also, not wanting anyone to get their hopes up in thinking they will hear back sooner. We all know how many admissions offices take a long time to respond to applicants as well. It is all a moot point for me, as I have been admitted, with the exception of waiting for financial aid like others have. As always, best of luck.
Last edited by PopTorts13 on Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I just withdrew as the financial offer was way too small for me. Hoping one of you gets in, GL to the waitlisted!
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
second UR update! 3/2. moved from first UR 2/28. That is fast. Should I be expecting something pretty soon?
fingers crossed.......
fingers crossed.......
- thelong
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:55 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow, you're 2/2 in the threads I read for asking questions that have been answered > or = to 100 times.xjykybl wrote:second UR update! 3/2. moved from first UR 2/28. That is fast. Should I be expecting something pretty soon?
fingers crossed.......
To answer your question, probably not. Chicago gives decisions in waves and most people will be getting UR 3 right around the time decisions are released. Consequently, you'll see this thread start to blow up.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yeah, sorry for not doing my homework by turning a few pages back in the thread.thelong wrote:Wow, you're 2/2 in the threads I read for asking questions that have been answered > or = to 100 times.xjykybl wrote:second UR update! 3/2. moved from first UR 2/28. That is fast. Should I be expecting something pretty soon?
fingers crossed.......
To answer your question, probably not. Chicago gives decisions in waves and most people will be getting UR 3 right around the time decisions are released. Consequently, you'll see this thread start to blow up.
thanks!
- jrthor10
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:33 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha getting testy are we?thelong wrote:Wow, you're 2/2 in the threads I read for asking questions that have been answered > or = to 100 times.xjykybl wrote:second UR update! 3/2. moved from first UR 2/28. That is fast. Should I be expecting something pretty soon?
fingers crossed.......
To answer your question, probably not. Chicago gives decisions in waves and most people will be getting UR 3 right around the time decisions are released. Consequently, you'll see this thread start to blow up.
- Liquox
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
testy= 5% boredom, 5% over-asked question, 90% where-the-f**-is-my-application
- thelong
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:55 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Getting? Since October.jrthor10 wrote:Haha getting testy are we?thelong wrote:Wow, you're 2/2 in the threads I read for asking questions that have been answered > or = to 100 times.xjykybl wrote:second UR update! 3/2. moved from first UR 2/28. That is fast. Should I be expecting something pretty soon?
fingers crossed.......
To answer your question, probably not. Chicago gives decisions in waves and most people will be getting UR 3 right around the time decisions are released. Consequently, you'll see this thread start to blow up.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:55 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Second UR just now! The next round approaches.
- avd90
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
2nd UR, first was 2/23. Bad sign?
edit: by this I mean the speed of UR meaning my app is an autoreject/WL
edit: by this I mean the speed of UR meaning my app is an autoreject/WL
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by YesNoMaybe on Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
second UR 3/4 after being under first UR for about a month.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login