Guys, it's April, there's very little chance s/he would be pending at like every school still.teampeeta wrote:No way it's real.JSWright101 wrote:I don't think so....152 LSAT WL? He'd have to be an URM and have cured cancer.vuthy wrote:Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
LOLZ. It takes but a tiny spark to start a blaze of apocalyptic proportions on TLS.Jessasaurus wrote:Some people just want to watch the world burnkathj06 wrote:I mean I guess someone could message him but I don't know why someone would make that up, unless it was an accident.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Anyone else watch Muzzy en español?muzzy wrote:andapieceoftoast wrote:1) Thank you for this.
Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.andapieceoftoast wrote:2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Could it be TLS' own Dr. Dre trolling us for April Fool's Day?wtrc wrote:Guys, it's April, there's very little chance s/he would be pending at like every school still.teampeeta wrote:No way it's real.JSWright101 wrote:I don't think so....152 LSAT WL? He'd have to be an URM and have cured cancer.vuthy wrote:Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Guy on the bicycle = hands-down best part. Buenos dia!muzzy wrote:¡Yo tambien!koalacity wrote:Anyone else watch Muzzy en español?muzzy wrote:andapieceoftoast wrote:1) Thank you for this.
Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.andapieceoftoast wrote:2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I doubt it, unless the guy has some truly baller grad school (4.0 PhD Stanford...).vuthy wrote:Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92
ETA Even with those softs. And what honor societies with that GPA? Golden key? I mean, maybe if he bombed first year and got 4.0 all the rest... but I think it's someone who made a mistake.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
kathj06 wrote:LOLZ. It takes but a tiny spark to start a blaze of apocalyptic proportions on TLS.Jessasaurus wrote:Some people just want to watch the world burnkathj06 wrote:I mean I guess someone could message him but I don't know why someone would make that up, unless it was an accident.

- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Gotta love those pay to play honor societies...IrishJew wrote:I doubt it, unless the guy has some truly baller grad school (4.0 PhD Stanford...).vuthy wrote:Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92
ETA Even with those softs. And what honor societies with that GPA? Golden key? I mean, maybe if he bombed first year and got 4.0 all the rest... but I think it's someone who made a mistake.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Luckily it's only 1pm over in California. Still time for more decisions 

- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I hate to be a downer, but she hardly ever makes calls in the afternoon. However, since we're getting toward the end of the cycle, perhaps today will be different!Scvaz7 wrote:Luckily it's only 1pm over in California. Still time for more decisions
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
It appears whoever purportedly called admissions and heard we would be notified by today was lying. Or else admissions lied to that person. In any case, someone lied to someone.
RABBLE! Rabble rabble rabble!
RABBLE! Rabble rabble rabble!
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This is fun - type in r e take (as one word) and see what happens
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hellomellow
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:35 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Chalupa-Batman wrote:It appears whoever purportedly called admissions and heard we would be notified by today was lying. Or else admissions lied to that person. In any case, someone lied to someone.
RABBLE! Rabble rabble rabble!
I'm the person who spoke to admissions and the person I spoke with said they are trying to make most decisions by this date bc of ASW. Their official deadline is on the 30th but that's what she told me.
I also hope they'll continue admitting people after today. I just shared what I was told.
- Chalupa-Batman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks for the clarification. No intention to convey or incite anger, I mostly just wanted to rabble (probably for the same reasons you called).hellomellow wrote:Chalupa-Batman wrote:It appears whoever purportedly called admissions and heard we would be notified by today was lying. Or else admissions lied to that person. In any case, someone lied to someone.
RABBLE! Rabble rabble rabble!
I'm the person who spoke to admissions and the person I spoke with said they are trying to make most decisions by this date bc of ASW. Their official deadline is on the 30th but that's what she told me.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Maybe someone else should call and ask for an update!
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Slytherpuff
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
DLS today... well, it was fun to hope for a while!
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
DLS just now I think.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
sorry to hear! when did u guys submit?
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
submitted for review 1/14. 172/3.9james.bungles wrote:sorry to hear! when did u guys submit?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
damn. i'd call to see if its a WL or dingzhcrobert wrote:submitted for review 1/14. 172/3.9james.bungles wrote:sorry to hear! when did u guys submit?
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
So sorryjames.bungles wrote:damn. i'd call to see if its a WL or dingzhcrobert wrote:submitted for review 1/14. 172/3.9james.bungles wrote:sorry to hear! when did u guys submit?

-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by Wiggly on Sun May 25, 2014 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thank you guys. being a K-JD and an international applicant, I am not surprised if it is a ding. I would prefer to wait for the mail.koalacity wrote:So sorryjames.bungles wrote:damn. i'd call to see if its a WL or dingzhcrobert wrote:submitted for review 1/14. 172/3.9james.bungles wrote:sorry to hear! when did u guys submit?. Definitely call to find out if WL or ding-this (Tuesday prior to ASW) is traditionally the day when waitlists start coming out.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login