Kind of like Harvard's deferral email, maybe?Campagnolo wrote:Guys, relax. This isn't a waitlist. As someone said earlier, a waitlist email is very specific and includes a form to be filled out and returned. This is just Michigan's way of letting us know they haven't forgotten about us (which is exactly what everyone wishes the status checker would do).
I bet all the schools are waiting to see how the 16% drop in applicants shakes out and are consequently moving more slowly this year.
If it's a waitlist, I'll eat my shoe.
Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- XCanadian91

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:03 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- XCanadian91

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:03 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I mean, what other t-14 sends an email to applicants without an associated (perhaps passive aggressive) meaning? I love UMich, but I just don't want to be in fantasy world.Campagnolo wrote:Guys, relax. This isn't a waitlist. As someone said earlier, a waitlist email is very specific and includes a form to be filled out and returned. This is just Michigan's way of letting us know they haven't forgotten about us (which is exactly what everyone wishes the status checker would do).
I bet all the schools are waiting to see how the 16% drop in applicants shakes out and are consequently moving more slowly this year.
If it's a waitlist, I'll eat my shoe.
Last edited by XCanadian91 on Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
dolfan0516

- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Didnt receive the email. Am a pretty weak candidate and Michigan is a big reach for me. Received my status checker 11/22. Dont know what to make of not receiving the email?
-
MumofCad

- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
-
hobojarpen

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:31 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm wondering the same. I've been working on it for the past 30 minutes...ColtsFan88 wrote:Does anyone think it wold be wise to send a LOCI right now? It says its they welcome new information but im not sure a LOCI applies and I don't want to annoy them with a superfluous essay.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- XCanadian91

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:03 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
MumofCad wrote:+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
Sage advice... for those who haven't received an email at this point, would you suggest we contact potential authors of LORs? Have it ready sooner than later?
- Mr. Somebody

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think the fact that many of us with similar status checker dates have not gotten the email, indicates that it is a hold of some sort and not just a "be patient" emailMumofCad wrote:+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
- dakure

- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Unless its an email for people who applied September/October/Early November?Mr. Somebody wrote:I think the fact that many of us with similar status checker dates have not gotten the email, indicates that it is a hold of some sort and not just a "be patient" emailMumofCad wrote:+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
- vincanity1

- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:40 pm
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I just received whatever that email from Dean Z was supposed to mean (I guess not WL, but maybe a hold?)
Anyway, I've already sent a why Mich and have nothing else I can update with. So should I send a LOCI without any update, or do another Why Mich?
Anyway, I've already sent a why Mich and have nothing else I can update with. So should I send a LOCI without any update, or do another Why Mich?
- dakure

- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm asking myself the same question. I don't know what to write.JamMasterJ wrote:I just received whatever that email from Dean Z was supposed to mean (I guess not WL, but maybe a hold?)
Anyway, I've already sent a why Mich and have nothing else I can update with. So should I send a LOCI without any update, or do another Why Mich?
- Samara

- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I did not get this email. Thus, it is likely that receiving this email is a good sign. Carry on.
-
MumofCad

- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Status checkers emails are administrative and comes in waves. You can speculate away in this process but the speculators are almost always wrong....and miserable. Your choice really. I def wouldn't read into sc datesMr. Somebody wrote:I think the fact that many of us with similar status checker dates have not gotten the email, indicates that it is a hold of some sort and not just a "be patient" emailMumofCad wrote:+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
And to the other question, yes, get it ready and send it in if you have another strong LOR.
Last edited by MumofCad on Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mr. Somebody

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
edit
Last edited by Mr. Somebody on Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- citygirl000

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:26 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sounds like yield protection? Would you seriously consider Mich over NYU? Maybe send a LOCI to let them know they are your first choice[/quote]
It would honestly depend on the money and the fact im from the midwest pulls me there a bit. i think i'll just send another LOR from my current boss. hopefully that will help.[/quote]
Got the same email as well.
How do you send another LOR? Through LSAC?[/quote]
Yep im pretty sure its the same process. i may be wrong though.[/quote]
Thanks!
It would honestly depend on the money and the fact im from the midwest pulls me there a bit. i think i'll just send another LOR from my current boss. hopefully that will help.[/quote]
Got the same email as well.
How do you send another LOR? Through LSAC?[/quote]
Yep im pretty sure its the same process. i may be wrong though.[/quote]
Thanks!
- Samara

- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
haha, the most credited response.MumofCad wrote:Status checkers emails are administrative and comes in waves. You can speculate away in this process but the speculators are almost always wrong....and miserable. Your choice really. I def wouldn't read into sc datesMr. Somebody wrote:I think the fact that many of us with similar status checker dates have not gotten the email, indicates that it is a hold of some sort and not just a "be patient" emailMumofCad wrote:+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
And to the other question, yes, get it ready and send it in if you have another strong LOR.
- XCanadian91

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:03 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks Bro.MumofCad wrote:Status checkers emails are administrative and comes in waves. You can speculate away in this process but the speculators are almost always wrong....and miserable. Your choice really. I def wouldn't read into sc datesMr. Somebody wrote:I think the fact that many of us with similar status checker dates have not gotten the email, indicates that it is a hold of some sort and not just a "be patient" emailMumofCad wrote:+1 - I'd advise not reading so much into this. Its simply an update letting you know they are still considering where to put you. If they intended it to be a hold, they would simply have said it.. Still a loci for those above 75ths or extra LOR for them/others can't hurt. I've always been of the mind though that you should throw everything you have at them from the start to try to avoid WL, rather than expecting it and trying to use LOR to get off it - so of course I would say send it given they are clearly very seriously considering your app right now and a strong LOR might be just the ticket!Onthebrink wrote:I really think this is just Michigan trying to be nice. They are just so nice haha.
And to the other question, yes, get it ready and send it in if you have another strong LOR.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
RomaRomaRoma

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:37 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Any thoughts on adding an older LOR that was never designated for schools...an old date would appear, but would that matter?
- Samara

- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dates don't matter, as long as it's not several years old.RomaRomaRoma wrote:Any thoughts on adding an older LOR that was never designated for schools...an old date would appear, but would that matter?
- Campagnolo

- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If this is a true hold, it makes me want to vomit. The way it's worded makes it seem more like a deferral than a hold. Like, second review or something.
- thelong

- Posts: 992
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:55 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I just think a large portion of us have butted up against that 10 week estimate they mentioned in the initial e-mail after they receive our applications. The e-mail is probably just to let those who haven't heard back yet know that they haven't lost their files and to prevent a stream of calls in the next couple of weeks.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Campagnolo

- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm considering calling (whereas I never have before) to find out, so it's not working!thelong wrote:I just think a large portion of us have butted up against that 10 week estimate they mentioned in the initial e-mail after they receive our applications. The e-mail is probably just to let those who haven't heard back yet know that they haven't lost their files and to prevent a stream of calls in the next couple of weeks.
- annyong

- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also received the email, early October complete date. I decided to withdraw my application, I pretty much know which schools I'm deciding between now and I doubt an acceptance or money from Mich would have changed anything, even though I think it's a great place and Dean Z is awesome. Anyways, good luck to those of you still waiting and I hope I potentially freed up a spot for one of you guys 
- acadec

- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 2:35 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I haven't. Complete in early November, LSAT over 75th and GPA below median.hyakku wrote:Has anyone NOT gotten this email that's not in? At least then we could know.
- smokeylarue

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Got the same email, status checker since early-mid November. 172/3.6x. Email basically confirms that we've been passed over for the time being.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login