GPA will be above 3.0 next semester and I'm retaking the LSAT in Feb so most defManhattanman wrote:Still hope.TheThriller wrote:Waitlisted 2.97/167
Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
- TheThriller

- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
- Lookingforanswers

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
I was waitlisted also, and was waitlisted last year, not a surprise, For those on the waitlist they usually don't start checking until late April/ Early May, and they were letting people know until early August, they went into their waitlist a bunch of times to fill the class, so there is still hope. The director is usually pretty up front about telling you what your app could have shown more of, so I recommend contacting her, that way if Fordham is your first choice you can do all you can to try and get in.
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Thanks for the info! The bolded sounds like an incredible service.Lookingforanswers wrote:I was waitlisted also, and was waitlisted last year, not a surprise, For those on the waitlist they usually don't start checking until late April/ Early May, and they were letting people know until early August, they went into their waitlist a bunch of times to fill the class, so there is still hope. The director is usually pretty up front about telling you what your app could have shown more of, so I recommend contacting her, that way if Fordham is your first choice you can do all you can to try and get in.
-
Bourgl

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:35 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Did anyone get accepted in today's release of decisions?
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Still complete at 11/13. Nothing at all. Uuuuurrrrrrggghhh
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JCFindley

- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
I will use my great predictive powers here and say you will get off the WL but without as much money as you will get at other schools that are willing to pay for that 174. A follow up why Fordham letter might help.feralinfant wrote:lol and a 2.9. Trying to figure out which of those stats is the one scaring em off.skri65 wrote:With a 174? Wowferalinfant wrote:waitlisted
also just got an e-mail reiterating what the status checker already told me.
-
havanese11

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
It seems crazy to me that of all the people on Law school network that have applied to Fordham only one has been accepted. Are they just extremely cautious, or just think higher of themselves than they really are? Someone with a 3.5 and a 170 and an acceptance to Michigan got waitlisted today, which seems a little ridiculous since their 50th percentile last year was a 3.5 and a 165. I mean they moved up one spot in the rankings since last year, not enough to raise their acceptance stats that much.
- dproduct

- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
YPhavanese11 wrote:It seems crazy to me that of all the people on Law school network that have applied to Fordham only one has been accepted. Are they just extremely cautious, or just think higher of themselves than they really are? Someone with a 3.5 and a 170 and an acceptance to Michigan got waitlisted today, which seems a little ridiculous since their 50th percentile last year was a 3.5 and a 165. I mean they moved up one spot in the rankings since last year, not enough to raise their acceptance stats that much.
- feralinfant

- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:54 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
i dunno. i might try it if i thought i could coerce some money out of them but that's seems especially unlikely off the waitlist.JCFindley wrote:I will use my great predictive powers here and say you will get off the WL but without as much money as you will get at other schools that are willing to pay for that 174. A follow up why Fordham letter might help.feralinfant wrote:lol and a 2.9. Trying to figure out which of those stats is the one scaring em off.skri65 wrote:With a 174? Wowferalinfant wrote:waitlisted
also just got an e-mail reiterating what the status checker already told me.
-
havanese11

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:45 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
YP[/quote]
I didn't even know what this was until I just looked it up. You're probably right though, even though it seems like backwards thinking to me I guess it makes sense for schools to do this. Makes this whole process seem like a numbers game rather than a legitimate effort to attract and accept the best students possible. I wish it was more straightforward.
I didn't even know what this was until I just looked it up. You're probably right though, even though it seems like backwards thinking to me I guess it makes sense for schools to do this. Makes this whole process seem like a numbers game rather than a legitimate effort to attract and accept the best students possible. I wish it was more straightforward.
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
It is really frustrating to feel like you're just your numbers, but at the same time, the schools have an obligation to themselves and their students to be in the best position possible. I talked to an admissions officer at another school, and she expressed how easy it was to become cynical after hearing, year after year, students rave about how wonderful her school was and then pull their acceptance once they were accepted to a school ranked 10 spots higher on the other side of the country. It is a numbers game, in a sense, but being waitlisted isn't an outright rejection and there are still more opportunities to prove that you're more than just your numbers.havanese11 wrote:
I didn't even know what this was until I just looked it up. You're probably right though, even though it seems like backwards thinking to me I guess it makes sense for schools to do this. Makes this whole process seem like a numbers game rather than a legitimate effort to attract and accept the best students possible. I wish it was more straightforward.
- JCFindley

- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
This sums it up.alwayssunnyinfl wrote:It is really frustrating to feel like you're just your numbers, but at the same time, the schools have an obligation to themselves and their students to be in the best position possible. I talked to an admissions officer at another school, and she expressed how easy it was to become cynical after hearing, year after year, students rave about how wonderful her school was and then pull their acceptance once they were accepted to a school ranked 10 spots higher on the other side of the country. It is a numbers game, in a sense, but being waitlisted isn't an outright rejection and there are still more opportunities to prove that you're more than just your numbers.havanese11 wrote:
I didn't even know what this was until I just looked it up. You're probably right though, even though it seems like backwards thinking to me I guess it makes sense for schools to do this. Makes this whole process seem like a numbers game rather than a legitimate effort to attract and accept the best students possible. I wish it was more straightforward.
- AlanShore

- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
so did no one get an acceptance yet? (despite her twitter posts?)
sorry for all the rejects and WL. It's not uncommon to get $ after being accepted off of a WL. good luck to everyone
sorry for all the rejects and WL. It's not uncommon to get $ after being accepted off of a WL. good luck to everyone
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
ajax

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:33 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
That is an excellent LSAT. You should be very proud of that score.JCFindley wrote:I will use my great predictive powers here and say you will get off the WL but without as much money as you will get at other schools that are willing to pay for that 174. A follow up why Fordham letter might help.feralinfant wrote:lol and a 2.9. Trying to figure out which of those stats is the one scaring em off.skri65 wrote:With a 174? Wowferalinfant wrote:waitlisted
also just got an e-mail reiterating what the status checker already told me.
Anyway, high GPAs are much more common than high LSATs. In this period of declining applications, and with Fordham's continued decline in LSAT percentiles, you should be fine. Make sure you are applying to many other schools in Fordham's range, and also a bunch of reaches. I would think you would get money elsewhere, and can use that for negotiation if Fordham is your first choice.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/
-
melissa91791

- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:52 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
here's to hoping that some acceptances come out today....
- kaf5250

- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 6:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
my thoughts exactly. had a status date change yesterday so I'm getting anxious!melissa91791 wrote:here's to hoping that some acceptances come out today....
-
lambert8

- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
feralinfant wrote:you mind sharing your numbers?lambert8 wrote:Waitlisted via status check
165, 3.3
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
rwt422

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:26 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Waitlisted via email yesterday, 162/3.9
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Shit, someone was waitlisted with a 174? My 169 is feeling weak right now. Still no update though.
- dingbat

- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
What's your GPA?emarxnj wrote:Shit, someone was waitlisted with a 174? My 169 is feeling weak right now. Still no update though.
Also, don't put too much stock in YP or that it's just a numbers game. I know people who prove the lie to both of those
-
melissa91791

- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:52 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
.
Last edited by melissa91791 on Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dingbat

- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
I wouldn't go that far, but I have a classmate whose GPA and LSAT means he should have been YPed, and another who should have been auto-rejected. I could have gotten T14 but took money/location. While numbers are the best predictor of how you will be received, there aren't hard&fast rules (well, if you're 2.2x/14x, maybe not)melissa91791 wrote:i agree, ppl put too much stock in numbers. i think that a lot of ppl who apply have the same, decent numbers, and i think the essay/college/maybe some softs do play a significant role.
- feralinfant

- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:54 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
+1. I'm pretty sure my personal statement and work experience are the only reason for my one acceptance so far.dingbat wrote:What's your GPA?emarxnj wrote:Shit, someone was waitlisted with a 174? My 169 is feeling weak right now. Still no update though.
Also, don't put too much stock in YP or that it's just a numbers game. I know people who prove the lie to both of those
- danitt

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Basically this. I'm a reverse splitter and if they just looked at my LSAT I wouldn't have gotten into any of the T-50.feralinfant wrote:+1. I'm pretty sure my personal statement and work experience are the only reason for my one acceptance so far.dingbat wrote:What's your GPA?emarxnj wrote:Shit, someone was waitlisted with a 174? My 169 is feeling weak right now. Still no update though.
Also, don't put too much stock in YP or that it's just a numbers game. I know people who prove the lie to both of those
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Not good, 3.1. I've got 2 years of WE, but my PS is pretty meh and I have some C&F issues which I think are going to kill me.dingbat wrote:What's your GPA?emarxnj wrote:Shit, someone was waitlisted with a 174? My 169 is feeling weak right now. Still no update though.
Also, don't put too much stock in YP or that it's just a numbers game. I know people who prove the lie to both of those
I've posted quite a bit on here, mostly in the LSAT forum, but I'm too clear on what "yield protect" means. Anyone care to give me the "for Dummies" explanation?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login