I'm not a 168 or 169, but I would wait until the end unless I get in somewhere better. I am originally from DC and worst case scenario I can live at home and commute every day (probably wouldn't happen, but I could). I'm IP and I want to end up in DC though. Also that kind of applies to any waitlist (the moving part). I told Fordham I'd wait until the end of May because I don't want to deal with crazy moving stress.stingray wrote:Even if they are planning on accepting a lot of people off of the waitlist, why would people with 168's and 169's wait until April, or dare I say August, to get an answer from GW? I can't imagine doing that. Moving to a new city, and making living arrangements takes a long time. Factor in the fact that it's DC, and multiply all of that by 10. If I'm moving to DC, I want to start making plans in February at the latest.
GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- fltanglab

- Posts: 557
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:44 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- JoeMo

- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I agree that it's claustrophobic in there. Even if you go after business hours, which I did. There were a million people everywhere I went.T00L wrote:I got in somehow, even though I have similar #s to some of you that got WL'd. I get this strange arrogant/cocky feeling from GW this year, and I don't like it one little bit.
However, I do think having class sizes around 300 (permanently) could only help the school. The physical space of the building is pretty max'ed out - borderline claustrophobic.
Anyway, I can't imagine how you 3.6+/167+ wont get off the WL, but it makes me mad (for you) that they'd make you sit around like that.
-
brandon-sa

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:55 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
anybody heard anything about the ED ? See many decisions made on RD now. Don't know when the ED decision will be made
-
benito

- Posts: 321
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:09 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Anyone else have a second status update? ....app first went complete 12/5 and updated to 12/14 today, decision maybe?
- crumpledq

- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hmm, I'm stuck on my first complete (11/4). No updates. Applied 10/25. RD.benito wrote:Anyone else have a second status update? ....app first went complete 12/5 and updated to 12/14 today, decision maybe?
Last edited by crumpledq on Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Mr. Carter

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:33 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I did, not sure what it meansbenito wrote:Anyone else have a second status update? ....app first went complete 12/5 and updated to 12/14 today, decision maybe?
-
dreamflower

- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:17 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I updated today for the second time.benito wrote:Anyone else have a second status update? ....app first went complete 12/5 and updated to 12/14 today, decision maybe?
Is it correct that people have been getting acceptances via snail mail, and rejections/WL through email? I'm expecting a rejection any time now...
- 6thbackstreetboy

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:57 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
From looking at threads from past years, it seems that most of the ED acceptances have come out around December 22. The rest of the applicants didn't find out that they had been deferred until early to mid-January.brandon-sa wrote:anybody heard anything about the ED ? See many decisions made on RD now. Don't know when the ED decision will be made
I felt my numbers(3.8/169) were pretty competitive for ED a few months ago, but now with the recent decisions, I'm pretty sure I'll be deferred to RD.
-
RRRd

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-----
Last edited by RRRd on Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
brandon-sa

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:55 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
6thbackstreetboy wrote:From looking at threads from past years, it seems that most of the ED acceptances have come out around December 22. The rest of the applicants didn't find out that they had been deferred until early to mid-January.brandon-sa wrote:anybody heard anything about the ED ? See many decisions made on RD now. Don't know when the ED decision will be made
I felt my numbers(3.8/169) were pretty competitive for ED a few months ago, but now with the recent decisions, I'm pretty sure I'll be deferred to RD.
Not neccessarily. I dont think many applicants with 170+ are willing to be bound with GW without trying a Top 14 school.
- cougarlive

- Posts: 307
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:53 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I updated again today as well...11/14, to 12/14. Did you two apply RD or ED? I applied ED and wonder if that has something to do with it.dreamflower wrote:I updated today for the second time.benito wrote:Anyone else have a second status update? ....app first went complete 12/5 and updated to 12/14 today, decision maybe?
Is it correct that people have been getting acceptances via snail mail, and rejections/WL through email? I'm expecting a rejection any time now...
Have any ED people been rejected yet?
-
sums

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:22 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I applied RD, went complete 11/8 and just went complete for a second time today. I was thinking i'd be riding the waitlist soon after I asked them to not wait for my Dec LSAT, but I haven't gotten any sad emails....yet...
- JoeMo

- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Agreed. I think 6thbackstreetboy's (love the name btw) chances are pretty good at getting into the ED program.brandon-sa wrote:6thbackstreetboy wrote:From looking at threads from past years, it seems that most of the ED acceptances have come out around December 22. The rest of the applicants didn't find out that they had been deferred until early to mid-January.brandon-sa wrote:anybody heard anything about the ED ? See many decisions made on RD now. Don't know when the ED decision will be made
I felt my numbers(3.8/169) were pretty competitive for ED a few months ago, but now with the recent decisions, I'm pretty sure I'll be deferred to RD.
Not neccessarily. I dont think many applicants with 170+ are willing to be bound with GW without trying a Top 14 school.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Samara

- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I would think that anyone who is above both medians has an excellent shot at the ED scholly. I'd say 3.8/169 is just the numbers they're looking to secure. (Those are the 2010 75ths for Cornell by the way.) Northwestern has a similar ED program for the first time this year and 2 of the 4 people who have received it so far and posted on TLS have GPAs significantly below median.JoeMo wrote:Agreed. I think 6thbackstreetboy's (love the name btw) chances are pretty good at getting into the ED program.brandon-sa wrote:6thbackstreetboy wrote:From looking at threads from past years, it seems that most of the ED acceptances have come out around December 22. The rest of the applicants didn't find out that they had been deferred until early to mid-January.brandon-sa wrote:anybody heard anything about the ED ? See many decisions made on RD now. Don't know when the ED decision will be made
I felt my numbers(3.8/169) were pretty competitive for ED a few months ago, but now with the recent decisions, I'm pretty sure I'll be deferred to RD.
Not neccessarily. I dont think many applicants with 170+ are willing to be bound with GW without trying a Top 14 school.
- JoeMo

- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I guess that really does show NU's total love for other factors that are not numbers.Samara wrote: Yeah, I would think that anyone who is above both medians has an excellent shot at the ED scholly. I'd say 3.8/169 is just the numbers they're looking to secure. (Those are the 2010 75ths for Cornell by the way.) Northwestern has a similar ED program for the first time this year and 2 of the 4 people who have received it so far and posted on TLS have GPAs significantly below median.
- stingray

- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They are throwing the term "early" in "early decision" around rather loosely.
-
RRRd

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
----
Last edited by RRRd on Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 6thbackstreetboy

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:57 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nooooo. Just when I finally get to point of accepting it's not getting to happen, you guys have to come along and get my hopes up again! No I'm totally kidding. Either way though, I hope they release the decisions soon.Samara wrote:Yeah, I would think that anyone who is above both medians has an excellent shot at the ED scholly. I'd say 3.8/169 is just the numbers they're looking to secure. (Those are the 2010 75ths for Cornell by the way.) Northwestern has a similar ED program for the first time this year and 2 of the 4 people who have received it so far and posted on TLS have GPAs significantly below median.JoeMo wrote:Agreed. I think 6thbackstreetboy's (love the name btw) chances are pretty good at getting into the ED program.brandon-sa wrote: Not neccessarily. I dont think many applicants with 170+ are willing to be bound with GW without trying a Top 14 school.
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Has anyone received the official acceptance package yet?
- paul34

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by paul34 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- crumpledq

- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are there any other 11/4 completes out there waiting for status updates?
Where is the love, GW?
Where is the love, GW?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yea, I got the Christmas card too. I'm assuming there is a bigger package on the waypaul34 wrote:No package, although I did get something like a Christmas card from them a few days ago.
-
Schang1

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:58 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
IN
3.4/169. Never checked my status updates, but I received a confirmation e-mail Nov 10th.
-
jkong

- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:01 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congrats! envy you so much..Schang1 wrote:IN3.4/169. Never checked my status updates, but I received a confirmation e-mail Nov 10th.
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congrats!Schang1 wrote:IN3.4/169. Never checked my status updates, but I received a confirmation e-mail Nov 10th.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login