Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum

[teampeeta]

To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.

[koalacity]

To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.

Yeah, I'm hoping that moving up the ASW was intentional and that they'll be doing things a bit differently this year to try to boost their yield and/or shore up their medians/class earlier. But I really have no idea.

[muzzy]

.

[texasgirl67]

[quote="muzzy"][quote="teampeeta"]To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.[/quote][img]http://gifrific.gifrific.netdna-cdn.com ... office.gif[/img]
Optimism. [/quote]

Wow, best one I've seen in awhile. You're my hero

[Mack.Hambleton]

looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions

[Dr.Zer0]

looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions

Actually someone posted a rejection with a 1/27 complete date a couple of pages ago.

[bhs12]

[quote="texasgirl67"][quote="muzzy"][quote="teampeeta"]To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.[/quote][img]http://gifrific.gifrific.netdna-cdn.com ... office.gif[/img]
Optimism. [/quote]

Wow, best one I've seen in awhile. You're my hero[/quote]





I'll try to do some recon at ASW. FWIW, I think that this scenario seems quite plausible.

[Chalupa-Batman]

looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions

Actually someone posted a rejection with a 1/27 complete date a couple of pages ago.

Yeah, I'm sure they've sent out some auto-decisions, but I think it's plausible that they're still getting to the later apps that required complete review. I'm complete 1/8 and still waiting for what it's worth.

[teampeeta]

To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.

--ImageRemoved--
Optimism.

Lol. I am trying to put my sarcastic self on a shelf and keep hope alive. This week has been rough. We could all use some Stanford love, Faye.

[Mack.Hambleton]

looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions

Actually someone posted a rejection with a 1/27 complete date a couple of pages ago.

true, there are a few rejects for late january completes, but no decisions for Feb completes or the vast majority of Jan applicants

[muzzy]

.

[andapieceoftoast]

Tried to find a gif I could steal of Leslie Knope saying
"Everybody pants now. Pants, pants, pants, pants"

But I couldn't

(cue someone else who's more tech savvy)

[muzzy]

.

[andapieceoftoast]

(cue someone else who's more tech savvy)

Stanford, I'm clearly adept at posting gifs and would be at home in Silicon Valley.

1) Thank you for this.
2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.

[muzzy]

.

[bhs12]

1) Thank you for this.

2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.

Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.

+100 for this throwback to middle school French!

[Brettanomyces]

1) Thank you for this.

2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.

Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.

LUH-VA-LEE!

[jjmaple8]

1) Thank you for this.

2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.

Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.

LUH-VA-LEE!

Did anyone else watch Téléfrançais with that horribly creepy talking pineapple? That thing gave me the heebie-jeebies.

[bhs12]

1) Thank you for this.

2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.

Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.

LUH-VA-LEE!

Did anyone else watch Téléfrançais with that horribly creepy talking pineapple? That thing gave me the heebie-jeebies.

Yeah! It had a beak, as I remember it

[vuthy]

Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92

[Wiggly]

...

[teampeeta]

Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92

I don't think so....152 LSAT WL? He'd have to be an URM and have cured cancer.

No way it's real.

[Mack.Hambleton]

look at those softs (AA and strong other softs), looks at least plausible, although I haven't heard of Stanford WLing anyone else yet..

[kathj06]

I mean I guess someone could message him but I don't know why someone would make that up, unless it was an accident.

[Jessasaurus]

I mean I guess someone could message him but I don't know why someone would make that up, unless it was an accident.

Some people just want to watch the world burn