Are you a URM? http://usc.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/?whichCycle=0910semigoodnes wrote:doubt it, who told you this? and is a 164 and 3.7 too low for admissions purposes?
USC 2010! Forum
-
primusux

- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: USC 2010!
- JolieSaraLee

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
The GPA is good, the LSAT not so much (although it's better than mine). Is anyone else a URM?semigoodnes wrote:doubt it, who told you this? and is a 164 and 3.7 too low for admissions purposes?
JolieSaraLee wrote:From the look of it people get the email about a day or two later. Someone correct me if i'm mistaken...iceskater1620 wrote:semigoodnes wrote:decision finalized but no email sent to me, is that a reject for sure?
164 and a 3.7 lsac gpa.
Same here....my decision just went finalized within the past hour and I haven't gotten an email so I'm assuming I'm rejected...anyone have any insights?
- iceskater1620

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
-
txhorn

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: USC 2010!
If you are WL'd it shows up on Status Checker. DF = Reject or acceptMatteliszt wrote:Look at law school numbers. I have good softs so I may catch a WL but I am not expecting a whole lot...
- iceskater1620

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: USC 2010!
*removed to protect my anonymity*
Last edited by iceskater1620 on Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- JolieSaraLee

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I am a URM[/quote]iceskater1620 wrote:The GPA is good, the LSAT not so much (although it's better than mine). Is anyone else a URM?
Me, too...you calmed my nerves a bit...
-
primusux

- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Could be a URM accept batch since it looks like a few of you are. That would be pretty disappointing.
- Matteliszt

- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Hispanic/Hawaiian, but I didn't do a DS. I have had a good cycle (I got WL at Vandy/ND), and I have a target letter for USC. So I guess its possible its accept.
- JolieSaraLee

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Well as much as I wanna be optimistic, I will expect the worst. I kind of wish they'd made the decision sooner, Loyola's deposit is due Fri. Does anybody know if they'll email or tell us the decision for a circumstance like that? Although I wouldn't really wanna hear "Sorry you were rejected" over the phone 
- Matteliszt

- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Could try calling. It sounds like if its acceptance they may make us wait as far out as 4 days before emailing. I am fairly optimistic but maybe unrealistically so
- Matteliszt

- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: USC 2010!
You are right at WL area. Do you have good softs?i went df 4/27 168/3.35 not URM
- JolieSaraLee

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Well it seems like if we're in we'll get the email tomorrow....I'm assuming they send it out quickly since it's so late in the cycle...I'll give it a day.Matteliszt wrote:Could try calling. It sounds like if its acceptance they may make us wait as far out as 4 days before emailing. I am fairly optimistic but maybe unrealistically so
-
primusux

- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: USC 2010!
JolieSaraLee wrote:Well it seems like if we're in we'll get the email tomorrow....I'm assuming they send it out quickly since it's so late in the cycle...I'll give it a day.Matteliszt wrote:Could try calling. It sounds like if its acceptance they may make us wait as far out as 4 days before emailing. I am fairly optimistic but maybe unrealistically so
Do you recall when you went IR?
- iceskater1620

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: USC 2010!
---
Last edited by iceskater1620 on Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
- JolieSaraLee

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
IR 1/29, 2nd Review 4/23primusux wrote:JolieSaraLee wrote:Well it seems like if we're in we'll get the email tomorrow....I'm assuming they send it out quickly since it's so late in the cycle...I'll give it a day.Matteliszt wrote:Could try calling. It sounds like if its acceptance they may make us wait as far out as 4 days before emailing. I am fairly optimistic but maybe unrealistically so
Do you recall when you went IR?
-
primusux

- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: USC 2010!
thanks!JolieSaraLee wrote:IR 1/29, 2nd Review 4/23primusux wrote:JolieSaraLee wrote:Well it seems like if we're in we'll get the email tomorrow....I'm assuming they send it out quickly since it's so late in the cycle...I'll give it a day.Matteliszt wrote:Could try calling. It sounds like if its acceptance they may make us wait as far out as 4 days before emailing. I am fairly optimistic but maybe unrealistically so
Do you recall when you went IR?
-
ViP

- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Complete 11/23.
In Review 4/27.
Whew....
In Review 4/27.
Whew....
-
mdgold

- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:28 pm
Re: USC 2010!
not particularly. I just called but they close at 5, so guess we gotta wait until at least tomorrowMatteliszt wrote:You are right at WL area. Do you have good softs?i went df 4/27 168/3.35 not URM
-
txhorn

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I don't see how it could be accept when a few pages back there was a 168 3.4x waitlisted and LSN shows a number of people 3.4x waitlisted as well. Why would they accept a lower gpa before those?
- iceskater1620

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: USC 2010!
txhorn wrote:I don't see how it could be accept when a few pages back there was a 168 3.4x waitlisted and LSN shows a number of people 3.4x waitlisted as well. Why would they accept a lower gpa before those?
Good essays/letters of rec?? Although, I'm not going to be overly optimistic...
-
hellomoto

- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:32 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Weird. I went from complete 1/20 to DF 4/27 without ever going into review.
I mean, I'm not an auto-admit, but to not even go into review...sigh.
I mean, I'm not an auto-admit, but to not even go into review...sigh.