U Chicago 2010 Forum
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
...
Last edited by APimpNamedSlickback on Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Fixed. Then credited.TheWire wrote:UofC...where [strike]happiness[/strike] fun goes to diemanagamy wrote:This thread seems to bring out the bad vibes from everyone most of the time.
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Looks like APimpNamedSlickback thought this was USS:BP thread.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:I am coming out of short lived retirement to say lmao at what just happened here. To be sure, I like both crankberry and brooks.
That said, crankberryt that was totally unacceptable. For him to call u out after having deleted your post was an intolerable affront. You should have said you deleted bc the 1st version was INSUFFICIENTLY harsh, then maybe pmed him afterward. U think reagan would have taken such antics from the soviets? Practically unamerican...
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Well yes, this is the city that gave birth to a baseball team who hasn't won a World Series in a century, and the second team had its best team ever banned from baseball. Also, Rex Grossman was the Bears' quarterback.
- ValiantVic
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:58 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Who would win in a fight, a hurricane or Coach Ditka?
BUT...the hurricane's name is Hurricane Ditka...
BUT...the hurricane's name is Hurricane Ditka...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1...crackberry wrote:Fixed. Then credited.TheWire wrote:UofC...where [strike]happiness[/strike] fun goes to diemanagamy wrote:This thread seems to bring out the bad vibes from everyone most of the time.
..which, sadly, this thread continues to prove
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
If the atmosphere at the school is anything like this thread I might see a blessing in the decision that is awaiting me later this week.
- D Brooks
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:02 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
APimpNamedSlickback wrote:I am coming out of short lived retirement to say lmao at what just happened here. To be sure, I like both crankberry and brooks.
That said, crankberryt that was totally unacceptable. For him to call u out after having deleted your post was an intolerable affront. You should have said you deleted bc the 1st version was INSUFFICIENTLY harsh, then maybe pmed him afterward. U think reagan would have taken such antics from the soviets? Practically unamerican...

We've resolved the issue over PM. Thanks tho apimpnamedslickback.
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
4sure...I think the hipsters @ NYU might have a lil' more appreciation for the FloydJericwithers wrote:If the atmosphere at the school is anything like this thread I might see a blessing in the decision that is awaiting me later this week.
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Who would win in a fight? Ditka or Gad?
Trick question, Ditka is Gad.
Trick question, Ditka is Gad.
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
TheWire wrote:4sure...I think the hipsters @ NYU might have a lil' more appreciation for the FloydJericwithers wrote:If the atmosphere at the school is anything like this thread I might see a blessing in the decision that is awaiting me later this week.

- dudester
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
From Chicago's Twitter: Busy day in the office and did not release any decisions today. We are still planning to release more decisions within the next few days.
- johnstuartmill
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:53 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I think I'm only person who's posted in the last couple of pages who is in at Chicago and likely/certain to go, so don't hate on the school because of this thread's sour turn.Jericwithers wrote:If the atmosphere at the school is anything like this thread I might see a blessing in the decision that is awaiting me later this week.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I won't. I wasn't even sure if I should apply to Chicago at first, but I am glad I did. Unless I get rejected...then I want my $80 back.johnstuartmill wrote:I think I'm only person who's posted in the last couple of pages who is in at Chicago and likely/certain to go, so don't hate on the school because of this thread's sour turn.
Hooray for movement. I wish they would say acceptances instead of 'decisions' though.dudester wrote:From Chicago's Twitter: Busy day in the office and did not release any decisions today. We are still planning to release more decisions within the next few days.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
The truth is I really respect Chicago. It's one of the few schools (with Yale, Harvard, NYU and Berkeley ....... yes that is blatant anti-Columbia trolling) that I would have considered/visited/waited for $$ offers from at this point. I think there is something to be said for the academic rigor of the school.johnstuartmill wrote:I think I'm only person who's posted in the last couple of pages who is in at Chicago and likely/certain to go, so don't hate on the school because of this thread's sour turn.
That said, it is the place where fun goes to die. My sister went to Chicago for UG. It was perfect for her. I think I would enjoy it for law school. But for UG, man oh man. She had a shirt that said, on the front, "The Top 5 Party Schools in the U.S." and the list was something like:
1. University of Wisconsin, Madison
2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
3. University of Southern California
4. University of Texas, Austin
5. University of Florida
The back said: "The Bottom 5 Party Schools in the U.S." and the list was (exactly this time, the Top 5 were random):
296. U.S. Air Force Academy
297. U.S. Military Academy
298. BYU
299. U.S. Naval Academy
300. University of Chicago
And she wore it proudly!
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Haha. Two schools right near the top of my law school list were #1 and #300.crackberry wrote:The truth is I really respect Chicago. It's one of the few schools (with Yale, Harvard, NYU and Berkeley ....... yes that is blatant anti-Columbia trolling) that I would have considered/visited/waited for $$ offers from at this point. I think there is something to be said for the academic rigor of the school.johnstuartmill wrote:I think I'm only person who's posted in the last couple of pages who is in at Chicago and likely/certain to go, so don't hate on the school because of this thread's sour turn.
That said, it is the place where fun goes to die. My sister went to Chicago for UG. It was perfect for her. I think I would enjoy it for law school. But for UG, man oh man. She had a shirt that said, on the front, "The Top 5 Party Schools in the U.S." and the list was something like:
1. University of Wisconsin, Madison
2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
3. University of Southern California
4. University of Texas, Austin
5. University of Florida
The back said: "The Bottom 5 Party Schools in the U.S." and the list was (exactly this time, the Top 5 were random):
296. U.S. Air Force Academy
297. U.S. Military Academy
298. BYU
299. U.S. Naval Academy
300. University of Chicago
And she wore it proudly!
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
In retrospect, I went to the wrong UG, and looked at the wrong rankings.crackberry wrote: 1. University of Wisconsin, Madison
2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
3. University of Southern California
4. University of Texas, Austin
5. University of Florida
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- D Brooks
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:02 pm
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:11 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
@ least 2, including myself, are going from #1 to #300crackberry wrote:The truth is I really respect Chicago. It's one of the few schools (with Yale, Harvard, NYU and Berkeley ....... yes that is blatant anti-Columbia trolling) that I would have considered/visited/waited for $$ offers from at this point. I think there is something to be said for the academic rigor of the school.johnstuartmill wrote:I think I'm only person who's posted in the last couple of pages who is in at Chicago and likely/certain to go, so don't hate on the school because of this thread's sour turn.
That said, it is the place where fun goes to die. My sister went to Chicago for UG. It was perfect for her. I think I would enjoy it for law school. But for UG, man oh man. She had a shirt that said, on the front, "The Top 5 Party Schools in the U.S." and the list was something like:
1. University of Wisconsin, Madison
2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
3. University of Southern California
4. University of Texas, Austin
5. University of Florida
The back said: "The Bottom 5 Party Schools in the U.S." and the list was (exactly this time, the Top 5 were random):
296. U.S. Air Force Academy
297. U.S. Military Academy
298. BYU
299. U.S. Naval Academy
300. University of Chicago
And she wore it proudly!

- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Why are they stretching out the WLs/dings? I mean it shouldn't take that long to send out a generic ding e-mail.
<insert false hope here>
<insert false hope here>
- js87
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:42 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
To bring some optimism in to this thread, their twitter updated to: "Busy day in the office and did not release any decisions today. We are still planning to release more decisions within the next few days."
If they were simply going to waitlist/deny the rest of us, it seems like it would be fairly easy to send the email. The delay may mean that they are still reviewing the remaining 2/4 updaters.
If they were simply going to waitlist/deny the rest of us, it seems like it would be fairly easy to send the email. The delay may mean that they are still reviewing the remaining 2/4 updaters.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
ftfy. Shouldn't the most recent tweet tell even the most dispirited among you that more good news is coming? How busy could they be if they're just going to send out a bunch of a generic emails?JollyGreenGiant wrote:Why are they stretching out the WLs/dings? I mean it shouldn't take that long to send out a generic ding e-mail.
<insert [strike]false[/strike]hope here>
- D Brooks
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:02 pm
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
It may mean that they were too busy to deal with the status checker system and update the database. It couldn't be that easy to setup rejections and waitlists for everyone. The tweet also doesn't say they were busy with the 2/4 applications, as they could have moved on doing other things not related to my batch.managamy wrote:ftfy. Shouldn't the most recent tweet tell even the most dispirited among you that more good news is coming? How busy could they be if they're just going to send out a bunch of a generic emails?JollyGreenGiant wrote:Why are they stretching out the WLs/dings? I mean it shouldn't take that long to send out a generic ding e-mail.
<insert [strike]false[/strike]hope here>
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
And it'd make sense for them to pick up where they left off on Friday with calling people if they were actually going to admit others.
But they didn't make any calls today. Just a tweet about "decisions" which = AXE.
But they didn't make any calls today. Just a tweet about "decisions" which = AXE.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login