Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Post
by JustE » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:38 pm
-
emkay625
- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Post
by emkay625 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:38 pm
Judging by the numbers appearing on lsn it looks like a few others in this thread are pretty secure/might hear today.
-
azgirl514
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:39 am
Post
by azgirl514 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:39 pm
In via email just now!!! I have no work experience and just graduated two days ago from my undergrad, so I definitely wasn't expecting this. So happy
-
mnkybtlr
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:44 pm
Post
by mnkybtlr » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:41 pm
Just a heads-up: I e-mailed them about the letter issue too. They didn't respond, but the letter loads for me now, so it might for everyone else as well. It feels so much more official on digiletterhead.
-
elibrarian
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:49 am
Post
by elibrarian » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:42 pm
basilseal wrote:franklyscarlet wrote:basilseal wrote:Wait- so who did get in?
No one can open their letter.
Argggh!
Also I'm dying to have a facebook group so I can creep on all my classmates.
Ditto. We can make an unofficial one?
-
83947368
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:16 pm
Post
by 83947368 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:44 pm
.
Last edited by
83947368 on Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Post
by crumpetsandtea » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:44 pm
????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
-
tmon
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Post
by tmon » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:46 pm
crumpetsandtea wrote:????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
Probably just a hold, right?
-
Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Post
by Samara » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:46 pm
crumpetsandtea wrote:????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
Not an actual waitlist. It's an ED hold. I posted on their LSN that it would be helpful to clarify, but no change yet. The rejection dot is also an error. (Should be for previous cycle.)
-
emkay625
- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Post
by emkay625 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:46 pm
crumpetsandtea wrote:????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
i think they were held from ed. That little yellow icon appeared on 12/16, when the rest of us got held.
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Post
by JustE » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:46 pm
Adm.Doppleganger wrote:In via email. saw the word mercer and assumed it was ttt junk mail. There's a ttt called that right?
So stoked! Didn't expect it. My professional work experience is a few months shy of a year.
Congrats!!! Were you RD or held as ED?
-
emkay625
- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Post
by emkay625 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:47 pm
ahhhh scooped!
-
crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Post
by crumpetsandtea » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:47 pm
Samara wrote:crumpetsandtea wrote:????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
Not an actual waitlist. It's an ED hold. I posted on their LSN that it would be helpful to clarify, but no change yet. The rejection dot is also an error. (Should be for previous cycle.)
Ooooooooooh okay, though I'm still confused by the hold. It seems like they'd be safe for the scholly, given the stats of others who got in.
-
sea15
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:20 pm
Post
by sea15 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:48 pm
In!
-
Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Post
by Samara » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:48 pm
crumpetsandtea wrote:Samara wrote:crumpetsandtea wrote:????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
Not an actual waitlist. It's an ED hold. I posted on their LSN that it would be helpful to clarify, but no change yet. The rejection dot is also an error. (Should be for previous cycle.)
Ooooooooooh okay, though I'm still confused by the hold. It seems like they'd be safe for the scholly, given the stats of others who got in.
Only one year of WE. I think all ED admits had 2 years or more.
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Post
by JustE » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:48 pm
sea15 wrote:In!
Congrats!!!! RD or held ED?
-
crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Post
by crumpetsandtea » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:49 pm
Samara wrote:crumpetsandtea wrote:Samara wrote:crumpetsandtea wrote:????? @ the 172/3.75 WL on LSN. WTF happened there??
Not an actual waitlist. It's an ED hold. I posted on their LSN that it would be helpful to clarify, but no change yet. The rejection dot is also an error. (Should be for previous cycle.)
Ooooooooooh okay, though I'm still confused by the hold. It seems like they'd be safe for the scholly, given the stats of others who got in.
Only one year of WE. I think all ED admits had 2 years or more.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!! Okay, it all makes sense now.
Also, I'm betting Tiago gets in today
-
dux90
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:35 pm
Post
by dux90 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:49 pm
In via email! 3.6/170, RD, submitted 10/10. 1+ year of law-related work experience. What an awesome way to kick off the holidays....
-
catholicgirl
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Post
by catholicgirl » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:50 pm
Is it self abusive to crave any kind of feedback? Even if it's a rejection?
-
Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Post
by Samara » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:50 pm
dux90 wrote:In via email! 3.6/170, RD, submitted 10/10. 1+ year of law-related work experience. What an awesome way to kick off the holidays....
Congrats! I think you may be our first confirmed admit below the ED curve.
-
tamereth
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Post
by tamereth » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:50 pm
Did all of you who got an email also have your status checker update?
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Post
by JustE » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:51 pm
Hmmm.... Starting to wish I had applied RD... lol.
-
crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Post
by crumpetsandtea » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:51 pm
dux90 wrote:In via email! 3.6/170, RD, submitted 10/10. 1+ year of law-related work experience. What an awesome way to kick off the holidays....
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!
(to everyone else too!)
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Post
by JustE » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:52 pm
There's a hard line on LSN forming at 170.... Getting nervous here...
-
elibrarian
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:49 am
Post
by elibrarian » Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:52 pm
Congrats to everyone accepted!
I'm also curious if NU is a serious consideration for anyone accepted?
