Yeah, assuming that this is not a flame (and the fact that people are thinking flame should be an indication to you that this is not a good letter), I'll offer some advice. First - don't send this letter. Second - rewrite, and try to strike a more natural tone. You want to be respectful, but not like curtsying-to-the-queen-of-England respectful. Write like you are talking to your boss. Third - get someone to proofread the new draft because as others have said, there were some typo's.ilovestandardtests wrote:I think many of you will find this technical. I regard my chances at obtaining admission as quite low, particularly after the wait. (173, 3.39). In that spirit I sent the following email. What do you guys think?
To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Whoops - just saw that you already sent it. I guess there's not much any of us can do then.ilovestandardtests wrote: In that spirit I sent the following email. What do you guys think?
[insert statement about how it wasn't that bad after all]
- SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
When Jeff Nordlander and I make sweet love and produce a super-child and that child becomes your merciless overlord, you will regret these words. But for now, let's all just cut Jeffy a break.DaftAndDirect wrote:f*ck...my bad.cogitoergosum wrote:Yeah, y'know - Jeff Nordlander...lsatcrazy wrote:DaftAndDirect wrote:who the f*ck is this guy?ilovestandardtests wrote:Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
I love Jeff Nordlander.
Actually, when I let it mull for a bit, I think I can't stand Jeff Nordlander.
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Jeff Nordlander.... [parses lips and shakes head]SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote: When Jeff Nordlander and I make sweet love and produce a super-child and that child becomes your merciless overlord, you will regret these words. But for now, let's all just cut Jeffy a break.
- SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
FTFYcogitoergosum wrote:Jeff Nordlander.... [purses lips and shakes head]SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote: When Jeff Nordlander and I make sweet love and produce a super-child and that child becomes your merciless overlord, you will regret these words. But for now, let's all just cut Jeffy a break.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thanks... [pursing lips and shaking head again]SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote:FTFYcogitoergosum wrote:Jeff Nordlander.... [purses lips and shakes head]SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote: When Jeff Nordlander and I make sweet love and produce a super-child and that child becomes your merciless overlord, you will regret these words. But for now, let's all just cut Jeffy a break.
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow, whenever someone tries to google Jeff Norlander they're going to get this thread as the top result... haha. 

- DaftAndDirect
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That is going to be one verbose f*cking overlord.
Alright fair enough. Jeff Nordlander, if that is your real name, I wish you the best of luck. I just really dislike the way that you form sentences.
Alright fair enough. Jeff Nordlander, if that is your real name, I wish you the best of luck. I just really dislike the way that you form sentences.
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote: When Jeff Nordlander and I make sweet love and produce a super-child and that child becomes your merciless overlord, you will regret these words. But for now, let's all just cut Jeffy a break.
Yeah, it's gonna suck being owned by this kid... he's gonna be all:DaftAndDirect wrote:That is going to be one verbose f*cking overlord.
To whomever of my peons it may concern:
In the months following my rise to eminence, it has become clear to me that some of you have been distracted from your primary duties involved with being owned by me. This became astoundingly clear to me on a number of occasions when some of you disregarded and laughed at my statements. So I wished to express the following sentiment: IF YOU DO NOT RESUME YOUR CUSTOMARY GENUFLECTION AND ALL-OUT WORSHIP OF ME, I WILL EAT YOUR CHILDREN.
Warm Wishes, Your Beloved Leader, Kim Jong Un Nordlander
- SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Damn, who said the kid's gonna be male? Also, the last name will probably be hyphenated with my own, thanks. Otherwise, pretty spot on. There may be a place for you in the new world order - no promises, though!cogitoergosum wrote:Yeah, it's gonna suck being owned by this kid... he's gonna be all:DaftAndDirect wrote:That is going to be one verbose f*cking overlord.
To whomever of my peons it may concern:
In the months following my rise to eminence, it has become clear to me that some of you have been distracted from your primary duties involved with being owned by me. This became astoundingly clear to me on a number of occasions when some of you disregarded and laughed at my statements. So I wished to express the following sentiment: IF YOU DO NOT RESUME YOUR CUSTOMARY GENUFLECTION AND ALL-OUT WORSHIP OF ME, I WILL EAT YOUR CHILDREN.
Warm Wishes, Your Beloved Leader, Kim Jong Un Nordlander
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Awwww yeah..SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote:There may be a place for you in the new world order
- SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also, FWIW, when you search "merciless overlord" on Google Images, this is the first result:

...I don't know what to make of this.

...I don't know what to make of this.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:03 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Glad to see all of the Penn hopefuls in here are such compassionate, thoughtful people. Just give the guy a break.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The break was given a while ago, now we're just trading useless banter in the genre of Nordlander-inspired Orwellian fantasy.skipy wrote:Glad to see all of the Penn hopefuls in here are such compassionate, thoughtful people. Just give the guy a break.

That's allowed, isn't it?
- winning
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 4:24 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just got the call! Missed it though and they left a voicemail. Should I call them back?
UCR1 - 1/27
UCR2 - 2/9
UCR1 - 1/27
UCR2 - 2/9
- Killingly
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Did they ask you to call back in the voicemail? Congrats!winning wrote:Just got the call! Missed it though and they left a voicemail. Should I call them back?
UCR1 - 1/27
UCR2 - 2/9
- hypothalamus
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Naiiiiisss!winning wrote:Just got the call! Missed it though and they left a voicemail. Should I call them back?
UCR1 - 1/27
UCR2 - 2/9

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:03 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Congratulations! Seems like you wouldn't be remiss to call back to say "thank you." Northeastern left me an acceptance message and I called them back and left them a message. They didn't call me back but I wasn't exactly expecting them to.Just got the call! Missed it though and they left a voicemail. Should I call them back?
UCR1 - 1/27
UCR2 - 2/9
- AntipodeanPhil
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think most people initially thought it was a flame (I did, until I did a google search).skipy wrote:Glad to see all of the Penn hopefuls in here are such compassionate, thoughtful people. Just give the guy a break.
Either way, it's not a big deal - some grammatical issues and unusual phrasing aren't going to affect a decision. having spent some time in the personal statements sub-forum, my guess is that both are quite common.
- FavoriteColorGRUE
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
congrats!!!!!winning wrote:Just got the call! Missed it though and they left a voicemail. Should I call them back?
UCR1 - 1/27
UCR2 - 2/9
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:03 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
AntipodeanPhil wrote:I think most people initially thought it was a flame (I did, until I did a google search).skipy wrote:Glad to see all of the Penn hopefuls in here are such compassionate, thoughtful people. Just give the guy a break.
Either way, it's not a big deal - some grammatical issues and unusual phrasing aren't going to affect a decision. having spent some time in the personal statements sub-forum, my guess is that both are quite common.
Good point, and fair enough if people thought it was a flame. I agree completely that the letter probably won't do too much to affect a decision.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DaftAndDirect
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
i lol'dcogitoergosum wrote:The break was given a while ago, now we're just trading useless banter in the genre of Nordlander-inspired Orwellian fantasy.skipy wrote:Glad to see all of the Penn hopefuls in here are such compassionate, thoughtful people. Just give the guy a break.![]()
That's allowed, isn't it?
Agreed though - break given. It's not really so much about Jeff Nordlander now as it is the legend of his name and/or his progeny.
There Can Be Only One...Nordlander-SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
updated for gender equality in marriage/overlord-spawning-coitus awareness
- Moriarty
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:29 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's a clear sign that the cheese stands alone. There can only be one!SmbdyBringMeSomeHam wrote:Also, FWIW, when you search "merciless overlord" on Google Images, this is the first result:
...I don't know what to make of this.
BTW your user name is the best. The end.
- Marceline
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:29 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just got the call!
Still in shock…
Submitted 12.1
UCR 1.27, 2.9
Still in shock…
Submitted 12.1
UCR 1.27, 2.9
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hi All,
Long time lurker, first time poster. Just got the call this morning. UR 1/27, 2/16. They said they just decided on my candidacy this morning.
Long time lurker, first time poster. Just got the call this morning. UR 1/27, 2/16. They said they just decided on my candidacy this morning.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login