Nope. UR1 3/29, UR2 4/26, UR3 5/6.nba101790 wrote:So, anyone hear today?
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Decisions today are looking pretty bleak for us UR3ers..
- kuddlykoala
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just withdrew!
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
goodkuddlykoala wrote:just withdrew!
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You misunderstand. I meant timing-wise with respect to decisions, as was clear in my original post. Apparently a lot of us, including me, went UR3 yesterday and have failed to hear from Chicago yet.Mal Reynolds wrote:What the hell are you talking about? There is actual data from this cycle and last cycle. Everyone goes UR3 and then receives a decision. What else are you looking for. It could be different but that's the only data you're gonna get.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I answered your question. You're just too dense to understand or read a few pages of this thread. Everyone goes UR3 and then receives a decision that day. If you guys didn't get decisions today it's pretty abnormal. However, like I said, the "data" or whatever that means, all points to you receiving a decision the same day you go UR3. If you don't receive a decision tomorrow it looks like the rest of you applicants are in uncharted territory. If someone wants to go back and read last year's thread, maybe something similar happened to the later batch of applicants.atomist wrote:You misunderstand. I meant timing-wise with respect to decisions, as was clear in my original post. Apparently a lot of us, including me, went UR3 yesterday and have failed to hear from Chicago yet.Mal Reynolds wrote:What the hell are you talking about? There is actual data from this cycle and last cycle. Everyone goes UR3 and then receives a decision. What else are you looking for. It could be different but that's the only data you're gonna get.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lol'djvincent11 wrote:goodkuddlykoala wrote:just withdrew!
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Date updated on status checker, still under review; is that technically UR2? If so, UR1 5/2; UR 5/6.
Should I be slightly concerned how fast that updated? Hopefully they're not ready to throw my application in the reject pile.
Should I be slightly concerned how fast that updated? Hopefully they're not ready to throw my application in the reject pile.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I believe so.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Date updated on status checker, still under review; is that technically UR2?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
App submitted 1/18
Complete 2/1
UR1 4/29
UR2 5/6
WHEN WILL THIS NIGHTMARE END
Complete 2/1
UR1 4/29
UR2 5/6
WHEN WILL THIS NIGHTMARE END
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did yesterday's UR3ers get decisions?
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No. We did not.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Did yesterday's UR3ers get decisions?
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WHAT THE WHAT. Another update just now. UR3 on 5/7?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Date updated on status checker, still under review; is that technically UR2? If so, UR1 5/2; UR 5/6.
Should I be slightly concerned how fast that updated? Hopefully they're not ready to throw my application in the reject pile.
Oh god, I'm screwed. That does not seem like the timeline of someone who is about to be accepted and potentially not the timeline of someone who is about to be waitlisted.
Oh god, Chicago, don't you know that I love you?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TheMostDangerousLG wrote: WHAT THE WHAT. Another update just now. UR3 on 5/7?
Oh god, I'm screwed. That does not seem like the timeline of someone who is about to be accepted and potentially not the timeline of someone who is about to be waitlisted.
Oh god, Chicago, don't you know that I love you?

- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JXander wrote:TheMostDangerousLG wrote: WHAT THE WHAT. Another update just now. UR3 on 5/7?
Oh god, I'm screwed. That does not seem like the timeline of someone who is about to be accepted and potentially not the timeline of someone who is about to be waitlisted.
Oh god, Chicago, don't you know that I love you?
Lolol, truth.

-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Frankie say....
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Anyone else having trouble reaching the chicago status check page?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Works fine for me.swordking90 wrote:Anyone else having trouble reaching the chicago status check page?
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Working for me.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Status checker working again. probably a glitch (no need to start theorizingFlowBro wrote:Working for me.

-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got the reject notice. One of the 05/06 UR3s.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Micdiddy
- Posts: 2231
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Rejected. I can't believe any school that would accept ElTerrible would deny me. Huge loss on their part.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Uh oh. Nothing here on my end. Yet. 

- dolfan17
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1JXander wrote:Uh oh. Nothing here on my end. Yet.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login