FlanAl wrote:rejected via snail mail. pretty bummed and confused about this but at least im in at better schools.
were you a reverse splitter?
FlanAl wrote:rejected via snail mail. pretty bummed and confused about this but at least im in at better schools.
1. LSN shows that there have been a couple of 165 admits.blc36 wrote:1. Anybody get accepted with a sub 165 LSAT?
2. anybody get in who got df on 3/31 or 4/1?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Yeah I guess the amount of dings depends on how many spots they have left to give, as well as how many acceptances they want to give out before their Law School day in two weeks.snichols16 wrote:1. LSN shows that there have been a couple of 165 admits.blc36 wrote:1. Anybody get accepted with a sub 165 LSAT?
2. anybody get in who got df on 3/31 or 4/1?
2. Not yet and, reading back through the thread at previous batches of admits, there haven't been this many dings with admits. I think, for at least 3/31, this is looking like dings.
There was a discussion about this over at the Harvard thread. The admissions person at HLS indicated to an applicant that those kinds of letters don't matter at all. At a school like SC I could see maybe them mattering more, given the strength of the alumni base and the mutual attachement between school and alumni. But at least at HLS -- no.blc36 wrote:Anybody have any idea the effectiveness of rec letters from big school members or trustee members? a couple of my friends applying to law schools have gotten some for other schools and they think it helps when your numbers arent quite up to the medians. sorry this doesnt pertain to USC...just curious
blc36 wrote:Anybody have any idea the effectiveness of rec letters from big school members or trustee members? a couple of my friends applying to law schools have gotten some for other schools and they think it helps when your numbers arent quite up to the medians. sorry this doesnt pertain to USC...just curious
Yeah that makes sense. Anybody get any for USC and get in?sUkNoIrzTforEall wrote:blc36 wrote:Anybody have any idea the effectiveness of rec letters from big school members or trustee members? a couple of my friends applying to law schools have gotten some for other schools and they think it helps when your numbers arent quite up to the medians. sorry this doesnt pertain to USC...just curious
All I have heard is that high profile recommendations only help if the recommender knows you well and can write a personalized letter.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Charlie Sheen said I have werewolf fangs, and USC seems to have factored that into their decision.blc36 wrote:Yeah that makes sense. Anybody get any for USC and get in?sUkNoIrzTforEall wrote:blc36 wrote:Anybody have any idea the effectiveness of rec letters from big school members or trustee members? a couple of my friends applying to law schools have gotten some for other schools and they think it helps when your numbers arent quite up to the medians. sorry this doesnt pertain to USC...just curious
All I have heard is that high profile recommendations only help if the recommender knows you well and can write a personalized letter.
Ha Ha nice!!flexityflex86 wrote:Charlie Sheen said I have werewolf fangs, and USC seems to have factored that into their decision.blc36 wrote:Yeah that makes sense. Anybody get any for USC and get in?sUkNoIrzTforEall wrote:blc36 wrote:Anybody have any idea the effectiveness of rec letters from big school members or trustee members? a couple of my friends applying to law schools have gotten some for other schools and they think it helps when your numbers arent quite up to the medians. sorry this doesnt pertain to USC...just curious
All I have heard is that high profile recommendations only help if the recommender knows you well and can write a personalized letter.
letter comes firstblc36 wrote:Do acceptances in the mail come in a packet or in a letter?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
nope ~3.6 170 I guess they are GPA heavy but since I don't technically have a gpa (and couldn't bring down their gpa median, foreign ugrad) I'm really not sure why they didn't want my 170Dreamcast11 wrote:FlanAl wrote:rejected via snail mail. pretty bummed and confused about this but at least im in at better schools.
were you a reverse splitter?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Your numbers merit at least $60K in scholly money....don't see how you could get rejected.crankyankees wrote:how long does the e-mail usually come after DF? 167/3.9 and DF 4/1.
As a former 11/22 it'd really suck to get an outright rejection at this point.
Same. Except I am URM.Bumi wrote:Rejected. DF 3/31. Splitter, non-URM.
This lack of an email for 4/1s re: admitted student website is rather disconcerting as well.maglialoro wrote:I dont think that is true anymore. 167 is only the median score. I think with a small school like USC it is a toss up. They have the luxury of being a lot more selective. Im 167/3.7 and i expect to be part of the dings in this pile.Dreamcast11 wrote:Your numbers merit at least $60K in scholly money....don't see how you could get rejected.crankyankees wrote:how long does the e-mail usually come after DF? 167/3.9 and DF 4/1.
As a former 11/22 it'd really suck to get an outright rejection at this point.
At least we know 4/1 is probably a mixed batch, as I shouldn't be outright rejected either.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login