There is no particular method to their madness. I would expect to hear within the next 30 hours or so - hopefully, a WL for youhellothisisme wrote:Oh... Oops... Carry on then.hypothalamus wrote:I was UR 1/19.hellothisisme wrote:Is it just me or are there very few January completes (such as myself) with DLSes? It seems almost everyone who has recently reported one has a 2011 complete date. I think they DO seem to be going through the rest of the pile in a general order of complete date. So now I'm wondering exactly how long I'm going to have to wait to get my ding...
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- hypothalamus

- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
Elric

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:27 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+ 1steelers2012 wrote:After reading the last 3 pages I went to check my status...
Still nothing :/
URM december submit
-
acappella

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 11:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
False! I got waitlisted. There's hope!hypothalamus wrote:Yep, it seems DLS's today are dings. It seems they are not able to offer me a seat in the class.
- hypothalamus

- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh, my bad. But did you get your today or last night? Last night, there were mostly (only?) waitlists.acappella wrote:False! I got waitlisted. There's hope!hypothalamus wrote:Yep, it seems DLS's today are dings. It seems they are not able to offer me a seat in the class.
-
hellothisisme

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 3:50 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha, well thank you. Looking at the numbers of people who have been waitlisted though....hypothalamus wrote:There is no particular method to their madness. I would expect to hear within the next 30 hours or so - hopefully, a WL for youhellothisisme wrote:Oh... Oops... Carry on then.hypothalamus wrote:I was UR 1/19.hellothisisme wrote:Is it just me or are there very few January completes (such as myself) with DLSes? It seems almost everyone who has recently reported one has a 2011 complete date. I think they DO seem to be going through the rest of the pile in a general order of complete date. So now I'm wondering exactly how long I'm going to have to wait to get my ding...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
jd20122015

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:07 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
still under review. boop be doop.
- yankees42789

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Regrettably withdrew (and feeling a bit queasy about having actually done so) - hope my doppelganger gets a call soon!
-
chucklesmcgee

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
let's see if a high-GPA, high-LSAT non-URM gets the call in the next two days.yankees42789 wrote:Regrettably withdrew (and feeling a bit queasy about having actually done so) - hope my doppelganger gets a call soon!
-
adam1

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Indeed...chucklesmcgee wrote:let's see if a high-GPA, high-LSAT non-URM gets the call in the next two days.yankees42789 wrote:Regrettably withdrew (and feeling a bit queasy about having actually done so) - hope my doppelganger gets a call soon!
- yepyepyep

- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still nothing here too. nov complete date. But its probably just a matter of time.
-
silverino123

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:32 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Long time lurker here...
DLS in the past few hours. Called and I'm WL'ed.
173/3.7 from Duke, non URM, complete late Jan.
Hopefully many people decide to go elsewhere and we all get off the waitlist!
DLS in the past few hours. Called and I'm WL'ed.
173/3.7 from Duke, non URM, complete late Jan.
Hopefully many people decide to go elsewhere and we all get off the waitlist!
-
Barca10

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are we anticipating a total URM bloodbath tomorrow?
-
chen8406

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:40 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Another day
Staring out of my window
Thinkin' 'bout tomorrow
Wishing things would clear
No nee to rush
I ain't gonna worry
Any moment my sorrow
Is bound to disappear
Sometimes I tell myself
I'm better off without you
And then I have to face the emptiness
I feel inside without you
And find a way to make it through another day
Staring out of my window
Thinkin' 'bout tomorrow
Wishing things would clear
No nee to rush
I ain't gonna worry
Any moment my sorrow
Is bound to disappear
Sometimes I tell myself
I'm better off without you
And then I have to face the emptiness
I feel inside without you
And find a way to make it through another day
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- amc987

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Unfortunately, I think it may be time to get out the violins. The URM boat may be sinking tomorrow. I hope I'm wrong and that there is something to this doppelganger theory. Maybe Dean Deal will make some calls to the survivors? Goodness knows we could do with some good news in this thread.Barca10 wrote:Are we anticipating a total URM bloodbath tomorrow?
-
chucklesmcgee

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm hoping if there may be a few extra URM admits once Stanford's firmed up its 25-50-75th numbers. If your LSAT/GPA numbers aren't going to budge, might as well admit a dozen more URMs and significantly bring up your diversity numbers right?Barca10 wrote:Are we anticipating a total URM bloodbath tomorrow?
-
jd20122015

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:07 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1chucklesmcgee wrote:I'm hoping if there may be a few extra URM admits once Stanford's firmed up its 25-50-75th numbers. If your LSAT/GPA numbers aren't going to budge, might as well admit a dozen more URMs and significantly bring up your diversity numbers right?Barca10 wrote:Are we anticipating a total URM bloodbath tomorrow?
- amc987

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I really hope you're right, chuckles.chucklesmcgee wrote:I'm hoping if there may be a few extra URM admits once Stanford's firmed up its 25-50-75th numbers. If your LSAT/GPA numbers aren't going to budge, might as well admit a dozen more URMs and significantly bring up your diversity numbers right?Barca10 wrote:Are we anticipating a total URM bloodbath tomorrow?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Chucky21

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In any case, we have all come a long way... and lads, feast tonight! For tomorrow we will dine in Hades!amc987 wrote:I really hope you're right, chuckles.chucklesmcgee wrote:I'm hoping if there may be a few extra URM admits once Stanford's firmed up its 25-50-75th numbers. If your LSAT/GPA numbers aren't going to budge, might as well admit a dozen more URMs and significantly bring up your diversity numbers right?Barca10 wrote:Are we anticipating a total URM bloodbath tomorrow?
- larsoner

- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:33 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still UR, non-URM.
- Shooter

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ugh... why did I go and dig up last year's thread from April?
It doesn't look good, folks. It doesn't look good.

EDIT: Comfort me...
It doesn't look good, folks. It doesn't look good.
EDIT: Comfort me...
Last edited by Shooter on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- klingonsrock

- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:30 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Personally, and I'm sure that any vets will agree, I think we should have a hunger games-style scenario every time they take someone off the wait list.Parmenides wrote:At this point, I'm just hoping that they'll invite the rest of us to some island off the California coast to compete in an Enter the Dragon style event for the last open seat.
I wouldn't win, but it would make for a better story than opening an envelope to find a rejection.
And may the odds be ever in your favor! --ImageRemoved--
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just called. Was a WL.
- Shooter

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I would totes volunteer as tribute.
-
jd20122015

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:07 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
if we're all doomed to the wait list or a rejection, what is the hold up?!
- Shooter

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, the hold-up is related to whether or not we are waitlists or rejections.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login