+1 to all of this.Congrats to everyone. Is anyone still "under review" from 10/28 (or earlier) without a JR1? Thoroughly surprised I haven't been rejected yet.
Harvard 2010! Forum
- Shaggier1

- Posts: 731
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:57 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
-
mockstar

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1 for me as well. My only difference is that my status has updated as UR a couple more times so that it now says 1/6 UR--whatever that means.Shaggier1 wrote:+1 to all of this.Congrats to everyone. Is anyone still "under review" from 10/28 (or earlier) without a JR1? Thoroughly surprised I haven't been rejected yet.
-
cali09

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:52 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Submitted app: 12/1
Under Review: 12/20
JR1: 1/7
App. Complete: 1/7
JR2: 1/11!!!
Still somewhat in disbelief that I got in this afternoon! LSAT was below 25th percentile, but GPA was high and pretty interesting softs.
G/l everyone! Getting into law school is def not all about the numbers - hope some more JR2s start rolling in for ppl!
Under Review: 12/20
JR1: 1/7
App. Complete: 1/7
JR2: 1/11!!!
Still somewhat in disbelief that I got in this afternoon! LSAT was below 25th percentile, but GPA was high and pretty interesting softs.
G/l everyone! Getting into law school is def not all about the numbers - hope some more JR2s start rolling in for ppl!
-
crazyforhys

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:16 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
- Reinhardt

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:27 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
There seems to be more love for reverse splitters than regular splitters.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
mockstar

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Can someone explain what that means to a noob like myself? I know that a splitter is where you have a high LSAT and low GPA or vice versa, but what is the whole reverse/regular splitter thing?msoftceo wrote:There seems to be more love for reverse splitters than regular splitters.
- GeePee

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
On TLS, traditional splitters are high LSAT/low GPA types. Reverse Splitters are the opposite. Harvard, so far, seems much more amenable to accepting 168-171 with a near-4.0 than anyone with <3.7, regardless of LSAT. Hence, CEO's post.mockstar wrote:Can someone explain what that means to a noob like myself? I know that a splitter is where you have a high LSAT and low GPA or vice versa, but what is the whole reverse/regular splitter thing?msoftceo wrote:There seems to be more love for reverse splitters than regular splitters.
- englawyer

- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
with a 166 , the rest of your application must have been amazing. cough it upcali09 wrote:Submitted app: 12/1
Under Review: 12/20
JR1: 1/7
App. Complete: 1/7
JR2: 1/11!!!
Still somewhat in disbelief that I got in this afternoon! LSAT was below 25th percentile, but GPA was high and pretty interesting softs.
G/l everyone! Getting into law school is def not all about the numbers - hope some more JR2s start rolling in for ppl!
- Reinhardt

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:27 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
H took 16 self-identified URMs on LSN last cycle (2 are fake), and 14 the cycle before that. So far, only 3 have gotten in (1 is fake). Anyone wanna take a crack at explaining this discrepancy?
- fidesverita

- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It's only january...? give it until April.msoftceo wrote:H took 16 self-identified URMs on LSN last cycle (2 are fake), and 14 the cycle before that. So far, only 3 have gotten in (1 is fake). Anyone wanna take a crack at explaining this discrepancy?
-
Rock of Love

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:56 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Last year they didn't start sending out waves of rejections until mid-March.js87 wrote:Congrats to everyone. Is anyone still "under review" from 10/28 (or earlier) without a JR1? Thoroughly surprised I haven't been rejected yet.
- Reinhardt

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:27 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Aware that my question looked a little stupid, I compared the non-URM numbers as well.
2009-2010
Non URMs admitted: ~83
URMs admitted: 3
2008-2009
Non URMs admitted: ~149
URMs admitted: 16
2009-2010
Non URMs admitted: ~83
URMs admitted: 3
2008-2009
Non URMs admitted: ~149
URMs admitted: 16
- 5ky

- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
URM cycles generally take longer, I believe. Many URMs might not find out until later about their decisions.msoftceo wrote:H took 16 self-identified URMs on LSN last cycle (2 are fake), and 14 the cycle before that. So far, only 3 have gotten in (1 is fake). Anyone wanna take a crack at explaining this discrepancy?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
mockstar

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
GeePee wrote:On TLS, traditional splitters are high LSAT/low GPA types. Reverse Splitters are the opposite. Harvard, so far, seems much more amenable to accepting 168-171 with a near-4.0 than anyone with <3.7, regardless of LSAT. Hence, CEO's post.mockstar wrote:Can someone explain what that means to a noob like myself? I know that a splitter is where you have a high LSAT and low GPA or vice versa, but what is the whole reverse/regular splitter thing?msoftceo wrote:There seems to be more love for reverse splitters than regular splitters.
Hmmm I like the sound of that! Here's hoping it rings true for some other folks in that situation...
- Nom Sawyer

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1, it seems that for HLS they wait until later for URM decisions, and don't have as quick a time-frame for urms unless they have near median numbers.5ky wrote:URM cycles generally take longer, I believe. Many URMs might not find out until later about their decisions.msoftceo wrote:H took 16 self-identified URMs on LSN last cycle (2 are fake), and 14 the cycle before that. So far, only 3 have gotten in (1 is fake). Anyone wanna take a crack at explaining this discrepancy?
-
bazoogakitty

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:51 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Rejection email received a couple days ago. Disappointing, but best of luck to everyone else applying.
-
amidea

- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Sorry to hear thatbazoogakitty wrote:Rejection email received a couple days ago. Disappointing, but best of luck to everyone else applying.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Saya

- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:33 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
It seems the holds and rejections are coming in order. Mid-late October applications are up next.
The next wave of rejections are coming. I can hear it. *feels nauseous* How badly I've stopped wanting email.
The next wave of rejections are coming. I can hear it. *feels nauseous* How badly I've stopped wanting email.
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
They have already begun, but will likely continue to do so throughout the week.Saya wrote:It seems the holds and rejections are coming in order. Mid-late October applications are up next.
The next wave of rejections are coming. I can hear it. *feels nauseous* How badly I've stopped wanting email.
- Emma.

- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Fuck yeah, GeePee!GeePee wrote:Just got my JR2 ~10 minutes ago now!!!!!!
Calls are still coming! Standby!
as if there were ever any doubt
Congrats, everyone!
-
RhubarbPie

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
For anyone who get the held email, in the email it states "All correspondence to our office should include your LSDAS registration number and be signed by you". Does this mean that Harvard doesn't want anything via email, and all additional material (including LOCI, updated resume, etc.) should be sent via snail mail?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nattybro

- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:07 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
My understanding is that this is always the case for HLS whether on hold or nothykang wrote:For anyone who get the held email, in the email it states "All correspondence to our office should include your LSDAS registration number and be signed by you". Does this mean that Harvard doesn't want anything via email, and all additional material (including LOCI, updated resume, etc.) should be sent via snail mail?
- Core

- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Any holds or other news today?
-
RhubarbPie

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Thanks!nattybro wrote:My understanding is that this is always the case for HLS whether on hold or nothykang wrote:For anyone who get the held email, in the email it states "All correspondence to our office should include your LSDAS registration number and be signed by you". Does this mean that Harvard doesn't want anything via email, and all additional material (including LOCI, updated resume, etc.) should be sent via snail mail?
-
questions

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
sadfdasfsadf
Last edited by questions on Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login