Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held as well
-
khaleesi

- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:13 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Last edited by khaleesi on Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 02889

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also held, 170/3.7.
I don't really understand the strategy of semi-simultaneously sending out batches of Holds and Reserves (nor do I really understand the point of a 'Hold' decision at all). For plenty of people, they will ultimately be accepted -- why not just accept them now, or say nothing and accept them next month? For someone with my numbers who will certainly go from Hold -> Reserve -> ultimate rejection, why put me on hold at all? It feels pretty pointless.
I don't really understand the strategy of semi-simultaneously sending out batches of Holds and Reserves (nor do I really understand the point of a 'Hold' decision at all). For plenty of people, they will ultimately be accepted -- why not just accept them now, or say nothing and accept them next month? For someone with my numbers who will certainly go from Hold -> Reserve -> ultimate rejection, why put me on hold at all? It feels pretty pointless.
-
oldschool123

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:23 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Was held as of last week. Are most people who were held planning on submitting a LOCI?
For me it feels kind of silly......it's Columbia, of course I'm still interested!
But I guess at this point it can't hurt?
For me it feels kind of silly......it's Columbia, of course I'm still interested!
But I guess at this point it can't hurt?
- digifly

- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held. Applied Mid-November, 170 3.9.
Edit: Is it LOCI time?
Edit: Is it LOCI time?
Last edited by digifly on Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- zidane13

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:26 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held. #s in profile.
- eav1277

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not rejected! Hold. 
-
WaitingandHopeful

- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I actually appreciate being notified of a hold. It at least provides a natural point to send additional info and allows the person waiting to stop checking their phone/email every 30 seconds for a while.02889 wrote:Also held, 170/3.7.
I don't really understand the strategy of semi-simultaneously sending out batches of Holds and Reserves (nor do I really understand the point of a 'Hold' decision at all). For plenty of people, they will ultimately be accepted -- why not just accept them now, or say nothing and accept them next month? For someone with my numbers who will certainly go from Hold -> Reserve -> ultimate rejection, why put me on hold at all? It feels pretty pointless.
Much better than anxiously awaiting word from the half dozen schools that have effectively given me a "soft hold" and have no intention of telling me anything until April.
Held at Harvard, GTown, Penn so far.
-
jojo0508

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:42 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held via email. 173/3.54. Completed early January.
- Jaqen

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
-
housebro13

- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry to hear about all the holds....or happy to hear about it depending on how you're taking it. I've heard absolutely nothing since mid-Nov complete. Columbia, please stop toying with me and render my decision already!
- bluecouch

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
At first, I thought:
But then I read this:02889 wrote:Also held, 170/3.7.
I don't really understand the strategy of semi-simultaneously sending out batches of Holds and Reserves (nor do I really understand the point of a 'Hold' decision at all). For plenty of people, they will ultimately be accepted -- why not just accept them now, or say nothing and accept them next month? For someone with my numbers who will certainly go from Hold -> Reserve -> ultimate rejection, why put me on hold at all? It feels pretty pointless.
Then I thought, "Time for a LOCI and a resume update!" And now I feel a little better about the whole thing.WaitingandHopeful wrote:I actually appreciate being notified of a hold. It at least provides a natural point to send additional info and allows the person waiting to stop checking their phone/email every 30 seconds for a while.
Much better than anxiously awaiting word from the half dozen schools that have effectively given me a "soft hold" and have no intention of telling me anything until April.
-
WhiskeynCoke

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:12 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held. 179/3.47, Applied late October.
Meh, at least it's not a reserve.... (yet)
Meh, at least it's not a reserve.... (yet)
- ph5354a

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry/Congratulations to all the holds. This is similar to H's holds, right? Not a WL, which Columbia calls Reserve? I'm sure a lot of you will hear good news eventually.
- HawkeyeGirl

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If you're out of school and have a FT job, can you send anything other than an LOCI? Not much has changed on my resume since I submitted...At least nothing the law school would really care aboutbluecouch wrote: Then I thought, "Time for a LOCI and a resume update!" And now I feel a little better about the whole thing.
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held. 175/4.0.
- zidane13

- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:26 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lolwutTripTrip wrote:Held. 175/4.0.
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Surprised at the high-LSAT holds. I'm done.
- ph5354a

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TripTrip wrote:Held. 175/4.0.
Sorry to hear that, Trip.
- Spritzpiggy

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Held as well. 174/3.8
- elterrible78

- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
God, some of these holds are really weird. This cycle is stranger than I ever imagined. It'll be interesting to survey the landscape once the dust has finally settled.
- ph5354a

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not to echo what I'm sure is running through many of your heads right now --but what the fuck is going on?? CLS doesn't YP right?
-
florida1949

- Posts: 262
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1elterrible78 wrote:God, some of these holds are really weird. This cycle is stranger than I ever imagined. It'll be interesting to survey the landscape once the dust has finally settled.
Held... 176/3.5
-
florida1949

- Posts: 262
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also, I'm literally 5 minutes away from my Chicago interview when I get the "Columbia Admissions Decision" e-mail.
LOL THANKS
LOL THANKS
-
housebro13

- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Spritzpiggy wrote:Held as well. 174/3.8
F. M. L.TripTrip wrote:Held. 175/4.0.