my bad bro. GL too!! (You gotta post in c/o threads more; I keep forgetting about you outside of the off-topics)blue_c wrote:No love bro?JamMasterJ wrote:came here to root for JustE
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:29 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Same here. Did people in the last round of decisions get a new UR the day of calls. And if so, did it have any correlation to what the decision was?lndixon wrote:Omgggggg UR 2/10!!!!!!!! aghhhhh i'm going crazy over here!!! *rips out hair*
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Blerg. Still 2/8 here, and I feel the cloud of rejection hovering.Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.
- JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't say that... we're the admits...franklyscarlet wrote:Blerg. Still 2/8 here, and I feel the cloud of rejection hovering.Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- blue_c
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:06 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I avoid on-topics due to lack of anything on-topic to say.JamMasterJ wrote: my bad bro. GL too!! (You gotta post in c/o threads more; I keep forgetting about you outside of the off-topics)
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think 2/8 is a mixed bagJustE wrote:Don't say that... we're the admits...franklyscarlet wrote:Blerg. Still 2/8 here, and I feel the cloud of rejection hovering.Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.

-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:48 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No one has heard back yet? So is Monday the day then? 

-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.PKozi wrote:Same here. Did people in the last round of decisions get a new UR the day of calls. And if so, did it have any correlation to what the decision was?lndixon wrote:Omgggggg UR 2/10!!!!!!!! aghhhhh i'm going crazy over here!!! *rips out hair*
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wait, I don't understand. If there weren't any new UR dates the day of calls how could there been a correlation?AS33 wrote:I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.
- SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

In anticipation of a ding. Cheers.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:06 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I also got a 4th UR today. I'm not sure what to think.Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorry, misread your post. I thought you were asking about any and all of the UR datesMal Reynolds wrote:Wait, I don't understand. If there weren't any new UR dates the day of calls how could there been a correlation?AS33 wrote:I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
New rule: You can't say "looks like it's going to be tomorrow" on twitter and then have it not be tomorrow. Would be very uncool, Chicago.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Based on the tweet saying that they are "almost done," I bet the people updating today are the last of the bunch. When people stop updating the calls will probably start. They wouldn't have tweeted "looks like tomorrow is the day" if they weren't sure.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
good luck everyone.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Gotcha gotcha. Yeah this batch looks very odd.AS33 wrote:Sorry, misread your post. I thought you were asking about any and all of the UR datesMal Reynolds wrote:Wait, I don't understand. If there weren't any new UR dates the day of calls how could there been a correlation?AS33 wrote:I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
sports wrote:Based on the tweet saying that they are "almost done," I bet the people updating today are the last of the bunch. When people stop updating the calls will probably start. They wouldn't have tweeted "looks like tomorrow is the day" if they weren't sure.
I agree. They know we're stressing. Surely they wouldn't do that to us... right? Right? o_O
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.
Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10
3.8, 173, 2 years good WE
Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10
3.8, 173, 2 years good WE
- Byzantine
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's scary the first time posting, but it gets betterhopefull2012 wrote:The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.
Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10
3.8, 173, 2 years good WE

I've got a very similar timeline to yours. Still waiting to get the 2/10 though.
- FavoriteColorGRUE
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
hopefull2012 wrote:The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.
Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10
3.8, 173, 2 years good WE
You've got me wishing I had a 4th UR! (My 3rd was 2/8)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Same...I'm buggin' now.FavoriteColorGRUE wrote:hopefull2012 wrote:The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.
Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10
3.8, 173, 2 years good WE
You've got me wishing I had a 4th UR! (My 3rd was 2/8)
-
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Good luck everyone!
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
4th UR here too.
- FidusAchates
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still at 2/8 here. I'm getting worried, since it seems like the 2/10 group is really strong.
Last edited by FidusAchates on Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login