this. as someone who had a solid SAT and GPA w/ very strong softs but did not get accepted anywhere but a crappy LAC safety school (and i applied early to stanford, my dream school, to get deferred and then rejected), i must admit that this doesn't make me feel particularly good.caved wrote:I think the problem might still be that it's a little hard to understand how your UG app experience was traumatizing if you ultimately got into Stanford, one of the most selective schools in the country and one that many would kill to go to, regardless of what may have happened along the way... I just hope by referring to it as your only "top level" acceptance you don't mean only acceptance within HPYS.managamy wrote:There definitely were such people. If it were all I knew about someone, I would also not think much of their motivation, etc. I had no choice, however, since I had no acceptances from my first cycle.LieutKaffee wrote:
I just hope there were people who looked down on you for taking a year off after high school. If that's all I knew about a person, I might suspect they weren't exactly "going places." Having a super-perfect GPA from friggin' Stanford and a 99.9999999th percentile score on the LSAT is a decent situation to end up in.
Now, I must admit that I am enjoying the process of proving all of their doubts and suspicions wrong. It's a very rewarding feeling.
U Chicago 2010 Forum
- gotmilk?
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:25 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
I've heard stories from Harvard students of professors saying "this is a C paper" before writing down "A" as their grade. The top tier is corrupt.VoidSix wrote:I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
No doubt. Engineering/math/CS students get low grades though. It's only us humanities types (and law school hopefuls) who have absurdly inflated GPAs. My high school was WAY WAY harder than Stanford.VoidSix wrote:I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
your high school was harder than stanford? absurd! no wonder you and managamy have 3.9's, etc. oh man, should have gone there.crackberry wrote:No doubt. Engineering/math/CS students get low grades though. It's only us humanities types (and law school hopefuls) who have absurdly inflated GPAs. My high school was WAY WAY harder than Stanford.VoidSix wrote:I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
so actually, i think top tier inflates eng/math/CS grades too, except that since the top half of those classes are basically autistic super-introverts, the normal students end up really shafted. this is my understanding from HYP, anyway.
OH and my chicago bit is that i was there this past weekend and it was WAY cold. that is all.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Part of the reason I say that is that half the kids at Stanford are math/science geeks who don't know how to form a sentence properly. Those kids would blow me out of the water in a CS class or whatever, but if you put a competent 8th grader in a room with one and ask them to write an essay, you'd be surprised at whose essay was better.georgina wrote:your high school was harder than stanford? absurd! no wonder you and managamy have 3.9's, etc. oh man, should have gone there.crackberry wrote:No doubt. Engineering/math/CS students get low grades though. It's only us humanities types (and law school hopefuls) who have absurdly inflated GPAs. My high school was WAY WAY harder than Stanford.VoidSix wrote:I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
so actually, i think top tier inflates eng/math/CS grades too, except that since the top half of those classes are basically autistic super-introverts, the normal students end up really shafted. this is my understanding from HYP, anyway.
OH and my chicago bit is that i was there this past weekend and it was WAY cold. that is all.
And because someone like me can graduate without taking more than 1 or 2 math/science-y courses, I can get consistently good grades.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+a lot. College was soooooooooooo much easier than high school. I believe that the median is around 3.65, including the science students. Still, LSAC gives schools the applicant's %ile in relation to other LS applicants from your UG institution, so it should somewhat compensate for any distorting factors.crackberry wrote:No doubt. Engineering/math/CS students get low grades though. It's only us humanities types (and law school hopefuls) who have absurdly inflated GPAs. My high school was WAY WAY harder than Stanford.VoidSix wrote:I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
It's easy to say that everything turned out beautifully in retrospect, but at the time I was quite worried. Nobody whom I knew had needed to apply a second time. Of course, I am very happy with the turn that events took; I didn't mean to give a contrary impression.
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Fascinating conversation. I thought high school was easy-moderate. I had perfect grades with what I would consider a lackluster work ethic. I think a lot of my habits became so ingrained that I carried them over to college, where an effort level ranging from comparable to significantly more [than HS] earned me a frustrating 3.6.managamy wrote:+a lot. College was soooooooooooo much easier than high school. I believe that the median is around 3.65, including the science students. Still, LSAC gives schools the applicant's %ile in relation to other LS applicants from your UG institution, so it should somewhat compensate for any distorting factors.crackberry wrote:No doubt. Engineering/math/CS students get low grades though. It's only us humanities types (and law school hopefuls) who have absurdly inflated GPAs. My high school was WAY WAY harder than Stanford.VoidSix wrote:I've heard grade inflation is ridick-a-liss at Stanford. Like a 3.6 median or something?
It's easy to say that everything turned out beautifully in retrospect, but at the time I was quite worried. Nobody whom I knew had needed to apply a second time. Of course, I am very happy with the turn that events took; I didn't mean to give a contrary impression.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
The median GPA at my state university for my English major class is a 3.13 and my other liberal arts major is a 2.95.
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
How do you feel about college being hard or easy?VoidSix wrote:The median GPA at my state university for my English major class is a 3.13 and my other liberal arts major is a 2.95.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
yeah my not-so-hot GPA was the highest in my major. yay state school?VoidSix wrote:The median GPA at my state university for my English major class is a 3.13 and my other liberal arts major is a 2.95.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+Columbia, where I ED'ed. They dinged me without even deferring me.caved wrote:I think the problem might still be that it's a little hard to understand how your UG app experience was traumatizing if you ultimately got into Stanford, one of the most selective schools in the country and one that many would kill to go to, regardless of what may have happened along the way... I just hope by referring to it as your only "top level" acceptance you don't mean only acceptance within HPYS.managamy wrote:There definitely were such people. If it were all I knew about someone, I would also not think much of their motivation, etc. I had no choice, however, since I had no acceptances from my first cycle.LieutKaffee wrote:
I just hope there were people who looked down on you for taking a year off after high school. If that's all I knew about a person, I might suspect they weren't exactly "going places." Having a super-perfect GPA from friggin' Stanford and a 99.9999999th percentile score on the LSAT is a decent situation to end up in.
Now, I must admit that I am enjoying the process of proving all of their doubts and suspicions wrong. It's a very rewarding feeling.
- kittenmittons
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
All levels of school are easy, except middle school. I was fat.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ontologyfail
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I'm not denying that it's worse for fat kids, but I think middle school sucks for everyone. I still get scared at the sight of 13 year old girls. So mean!kittenmittons wrote:All levels of school are easy, except middle school. I was fat.
- kittenmittons
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yeah. This is true. I know about 5 kids who liked middle school and for each of them it's been downhill ever since.ontologyfail wrote:I'm not denying that it's worse for fat kids, but I think middle school sucks for everyone. I still get scared at the sight of 13 year old girls. So mean!kittenmittons wrote:All levels of school are easy, except middle school. I was fat.
- ontologyfail
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
This is why I let acquaintances friend me on facebook. I feel much better about never being asked to the dances when I can actually see side by side comparisons of how life has turned out. 'living in france waiting to hear back from law schools' vs 'living in the suburbs with 2 not so cute kids and a mediocre job'. I win.kittenmittons wrote:Yeah. This is true. I know about 5 kids who liked middle school and for each of them it's been downhill ever since.ontologyfail wrote:I'm not denying that it's worse for fat kids, but I think middle school sucks for everyone. I still get scared at the sight of 13 year old girls. So mean!kittenmittons wrote:All levels of school are easy, except middle school. I was fat.
- rockchalk86
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Love it. But lets keep this in perspective. Further down the road, your loser acquaintances are going to be home by 5:15, getting to see their kids in plays, sports etc... While we will be working until god knows when, and feeling irresponsible if we decide to pro create or marry because we know the majority of our time will not be spent with our family. I would take the latter. Mess around until I'm forty and then start a family when I have the time to spend with them.ontologyfail wrote:This is why I let acquaintances friend me on facebook. I feel much better about never being asked to the dances when I can actually see side by side comparisons of how life has turned out. 'living in france waiting to hear back from law schools' vs 'living in the suburbs with 2 not so cute kids and a mediocre job'. I win.kittenmittons wrote:Yeah. This is true. I know about 5 kids who liked middle school and for each of them it's been downhill ever since.ontologyfail wrote:I'm not denying that it's worse for fat kids, but I think middle school sucks for everyone. I still get scared at the sight of 13 year old girls. So mean!kittenmittons wrote:All levels of school are easy, except middle school. I was fat.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- thalassocrat
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:07 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Under Review 12/8. Went complete 10/16.
- violaboy
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:02 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Oh, I didn't even realize. My file went under review on 11/25.
-
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
They've made decisions on all the ED apps then? If another set of RD ppl are under review?thalassocrat wrote:Under Review 12/8. Went complete 10/16.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Went complete 10/13, now under review.thalassocrat wrote:Under Review 12/8. Went complete 10/16.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1violaboy wrote:Oh, I didn't even realize. My file went under review on 11/25.
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
woah. i was really hungry but now not so much.boo_pragmatism wrote:WHERE IS MY ED DECISION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!gahthelaw wrote:+1violaboy wrote:Oh, I didn't even realize. My file went under review on 11/25.
TELL ME NO SO I CAN STOP TORTURING MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!
--ImageRemoved--
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I was wondering where my Lady Gaga-costume eye-liner went.maggiebre wrote:= kid who had maybe the worst middle school experience everboo_pragmatism wrote: --ImageRemoved--
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login