GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- hadisious
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Finally went complete this morning. App received 11/18.
Good luck everybody.
Good luck everybody.
- grtbooks91
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
WL today via e-mail.
3.8/167
Mostly annoyed for, as someone else said, ruining my cycle's momentum. I'll probably withdraw soon.
3.8/167
Mostly annoyed for, as someone else said, ruining my cycle's momentum. I'll probably withdraw soon.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I would say no more than ten green dots on this graph would even consider attending GW WITH money.
http://gw.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats
http://gw.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes, I was accepted... but since I have been accepted to much higher schools, I would need near a full ride to conisder GWtennisking88 wrote:I would say no more than ten green dots on this graph would even consider attending GW WITH money.
http://gw.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats
- grtbooks91
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
After looking at LSN for this year's cycle, it looks like only one sub-168 non-URM applicant has been accepted so far. Do people think this is indicative of GWU trying to raise their numbers or just a byproduct of how early it is in the cycle?
I thought I'd be a lock with my numbers based on past cycles, but I wonder if this year is, for some reason, different?
I thought I'd be a lock with my numbers based on past cycles, but I wonder if this year is, for some reason, different?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Could be a few things. I think they're trying to cut the size of the class, though they technically could see an uptick in applications, especially among highly qualified candidates (I don't think this is the case though). They could also have a lot more money at disposal to try to lure applicants.grtbooks91 wrote:After looking at LSN for this year's cycle, it looks like only one sub-168 non-URM applicant has been accepted so far. Do people think this is indicative of GWU trying to raise their numbers or just a byproduct of how early it is in the cycle?
I thought I'd be a lock with my numbers based on past cycles, but I wonder if this year is, for some reason, different?
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow, I'm surprisedfakehunter wrote:My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Is GW going to be in operation next year?fakehunter wrote:My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
- Robespierre
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think 3.65 is above median GPA. But still, yeah, that WL is shocking.fakehunter wrote:My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
- alevin
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:30 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
grtbooks91 wrote:WL today via e-mail.
3.8/167
Mostly annoyed for, as someone else said, ruining my cycle's momentum. I'll probably withdraw soon.
Withdraw from the whole cycle? Or GW?
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't understand this WL at all. Due to a drop in applicants this cycle, this hardly seems to be the best time for GW to attempt to raise their medians.fakehunter wrote:My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Unless they are planning on cutting their class size in half... and giving just about everyone ALOT of moneyaaramil wrote:I don't understand this WL at all. Due to a drop in applicants this cycle, this hardly seems to be the best time for GW to attempt to raise their medians.fakehunter wrote:My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
msblaw89 wrote: Unless they are planning on cutting their class size in half... and giving just about everyone ALOT of money
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh, I looked at the LSN profile but I just realized it said Class of 2009, so that's a long time ago. Still, I'm confused. Oh well, I got into a better school I like more with money, so it's okay!Robespierre wrote:I don't think 3.65 is above median GPA. But still, yeah, that WL is shocking.fakehunter wrote:My first WL, with above median GPA and above 75th LSAT - (3.65, 169). I'm really surprised but I guess reading through this thread I shouldn't be.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 6:03 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
3.7/168 received WL email this morning. Sweet!
- crabcakes
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:21 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
wowtadlbb wrote:3.7/168 received WL email this morning. Sweet!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:55 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Okay I am convinced, they are going to take A LOT of people off of that waitlist.
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:09 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
if you look at the LSN graphs GW does tend to accept a lot more waitlisters than most schools, towards the end of the cycle they take in a bunch of them. But still 168's and 9's getting WL'd with good GPA's is nuts. I could be wrong but I don't believe there is any precedent for a school cutting their class in HALF in one cycle, and with the lower pool of applicants this year that everyone claims to be the case I just can't see an explanation.
- stingray
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:37 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Even if they are planning on accepting a lot of people off of the waitlist, why would people with 168's and 169's wait until April, or dare I say August, to get an answer from GW? I can't imagine doing that. Moving to a new city, and making living arrangements takes a long time. Factor in the fact that it's DC, and multiply all of that by 10. If I'm moving to DC, I want to start making plans in February at the latest.
- auburnbelle89
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:39 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I thought about throwing an app at GW, but after reading this, I have decided against it. I have no idea what is up with this cycle. Some of you guys have great #s and were WL, while one of my friends was below 25% on GPA and at 75% LSAT and was straight out admitted. So weird. Best of luck to everyone waiting, and I hope many of you get off the WL.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DonnaDraper
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:30 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not surprising. LSAT points are more valuable than GPA points.auburnbelle89 wrote:I thought about throwing an app at GW, but after reading this, I have decided against it. I have no idea what is up with this cycle. Some of you guys have great #s and were WL, while one of my friends was below 25% on GPA and at 75% LSAT and was straight out admitted. So weird. Best of luck to everyone waiting, and I hope many of you get off the WL.
- T00L
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:35 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I got in somehow, even though I have similar #s to some of you that got WL'd. I get this strange arrogant/cocky feeling from GW this year, and I don't like it one little bit.
However, I do think having class sizes around 300 (permanently) could only help the school. The physical space of the building is pretty max'ed out - borderline claustrophobic.
Anyway, I can't imagine how you 3.6+/167+ wont get off the WL, but it makes me mad (for you) that they'd make you sit around like that.
However, I do think having class sizes around 300 (permanently) could only help the school. The physical space of the building is pretty max'ed out - borderline claustrophobic.
Anyway, I can't imagine how you 3.6+/167+ wont get off the WL, but it makes me mad (for you) that they'd make you sit around like that.
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What are you getting this from?T00L wrote:I got in somehow, even though I have similar #s to some of you that got WL'd. I get this strange arrogant/cocky feeling from GW this year, and I don't like it one little bit.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:55 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
well, two weeks after I sent my complete application to GW, my report was finally transmitted to them. Given that this happened instantly with all the other schools that I applied to, I am already worried lol.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login