Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh, to try to get into the one of the best law schools in the world.
She is my role model: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/DCgoblue
All you can do is hope for the best, I 'spose.
She is my role model: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/DCgoblue
All you can do is hope for the best, I 'spose.
-
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow. This makes me think it's really NOT a numbers game, but must be more holistic. Why else would people with similar scores have different admissions rates? I guess for a lot of the top schools it seems to be that the numbers are necessary, but not sufficient to gain admission.tmon wrote:170 would give you a shot, but seems waitlist-y all the way through 174 really. Certainly a shot though.uchi15hopeful wrote:LSAC updated my GPA, I'm all set. 3.88 GPA and my LSAT prep is going well; I'm starting to really learn how to attack the exam, instead of being led by it (straight into tarps!), haha.
What do I need? A 170 on the October? Man, it would be so incredible to study at Chicago - I think about it each and every day!
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
When you're looking at waitlist information from this year, you REALLY need to check when they submitted their applications, because Chicago WL'd the crap out of everyone who applied late (and then used their waitlist). So basically, apply early and with a 172+ you are probably looking at srs $$.freestallion wrote:Wow. This makes me think it's really NOT a numbers game, but must be more holistic. Why else would people with similar scores have different admissions rates? I guess for a lot of the top schools it seems to be that the numbers are necessary, but not sufficient to gain admission.tmon wrote:170 would give you a shot, but seems waitlist-y all the way through 174 really. Certainly a shot though.uchi15hopeful wrote:LSAC updated my GPA, I'm all set. 3.88 GPA and my LSAT prep is going well; I'm starting to really learn how to attack the exam, instead of being led by it (straight into tarps!), haha.
What do I need? A 170 on the October? Man, it would be so incredible to study at Chicago - I think about it each and every day!
ETA: And not only did Chicago accept a lot more people off the WL than normal, they also tended to get money (even into the summer)
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am seriously considering an ED to Chicago. My GPA is too low to count on an admit at UChi or big money at peer schools, but then I see a post like Xifeng's. Decisions: Too difficult!
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well this past cycle is definitely weird, what with the decrease in applications and Chicago having all of that $$$ to give out. So I have no idea if it'll be the same next year!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Muenchen
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Remember when you said you weren't going to hang out in here as much?Xifeng wrote:Well this past cycle is definitely weird, what with the decrease in applications and Chicago having all of that $$$ to give out. So I have no idea if it'll be the same next year!
- tmon
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Would the consensus for anyone with a GPA <3.4 be that ED probably wont help and to just submit early and hope the waitlist is kind? Chi is definitely my #1 (if the October LSAT can put me in a position where I'm above the 75th percentile) so I would definitely ED, but it doesn't seem like a boost on LSN. Or am I misinterpreting things again?
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
There were actual questions/problems that I was answering! Ha!Muenchen wrote:Remember when you said you weren't going to hang out in here as much?Xifeng wrote:Well this past cycle is definitely weird, what with the decrease in applications and Chicago having all of that $$$ to give out. So I have no idea if it'll be the same next year!
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Psh, I distinctly remember you saying that as well.Xifeng wrote:There were actual questions/problems that I was answering! Ha!Muenchen wrote:Remember when you said you weren't going to hang out in here as much?Xifeng wrote:Well this past cycle is definitely weird, what with the decrease in applications and Chicago having all of that $$$ to give out. So I have no idea if it'll be the same next year!

- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I said I'd be in here less unless people had actual questions/problems. Psh.Hawkeye Pierce wrote:Psh, I distinctly remember you saying that as well.Xifeng wrote:There were actual questions/problems that I was answering! Ha!Muenchen wrote:Remember when you said you weren't going to hang out in here as much?Xifeng wrote:Well this past cycle is definitely weird, what with the decrease in applications and Chicago having all of that $$$ to give out. So I have no idea if it'll be the same next year!
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
YesXifeng wrote: I said I'd be in here less unless people had actual questions/problems. Psh.
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??

Just kidding
Or am I?
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Stick around to give us advice. We are lost souls.Xifeng wrote:
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'll always be around via PM!Tiago Splitter wrote:Stick around to give us advice. We are lost souls.Xifeng wrote:
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
· · · - - - · · · , - · - · · · · - · · - · - - ·Tiago Splitter wrote:Stick around to give us advice. We are lost souls.Xifeng wrote:
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dude we both agreed not to mention that.Hawkeye Pierce wrote:· · · - - - · · · , - · - · · · · - · · - · - - ·Tiago Splitter wrote:Stick around to give us advice. We are lost souls.Xifeng wrote:
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Woooops!Tiago Splitter wrote:Dude we both agreed not to mention that.Hawkeye Pierce wrote:· · · - - - · · · , - · - · · · · - · · - · - - ·Tiago Splitter wrote:Stick around to give us advice. We are lost souls.Xifeng wrote:
LEAVING NOW. HAPPY??

- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
A 3.43 and a 3.45 got in this past year ED. No one applied ED with a sub-3.4 GPA in 2010-2011. 174/3.37 was accepted ED the year before. If Chicago is your number one choice and you would be okay with paying sticker, I don't see how ED-ing could hurt at all and is probably your only shot. If you don't apply ED, you will almost certainly get rejected. Of 20 applicants on LSN with a sub-3.4 this past cycle, two were waitlisted (175+ scores), one was accepted with a 177/3.2 (no idea how) and the other 17 were flat-out rejected.tmon wrote:Would the consensus for anyone with a GPA <3.4 be that ED probably wont help and to just submit early and hope the waitlist is kind? Chi is definitely my #1 (if the October LSAT can put me in a position where I'm above the 75th percentile) so I would definitely ED, but it doesn't seem like a boost on LSN. Or am I misinterpreting things again?
If your goal is to have the best shot at the best T14 you can get into, though, there are certainly other schools where you'd have a better chance.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
same here, though I still need the LSAT score to jump to make this a conversationTiago Splitter wrote:I am seriously considering an ED to Chicago. My GPA is too low to count on an admit at UChi or big money at peer schools, but then I see a post like Xifeng's. Decisions: Too difficult!
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
On LSN, I've noticed that sub-3.5 splitters tend to do better at NYU/CLS than at Chicago. I wouldn't ED Chicago unless it's your clear favorite among CCN. This is assuming your numbers are not so low that you don't really have a chance at NYU/CLS anyway. In that case, feel free to ED Chicago.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
After my 500th look at the LSN cycles of CCN over the last few years, I've decided that this is totally credited. I just gotta figure out if Chicago is really my first choice.soj wrote:On LSN, I've noticed that sub-3.5 splitters tend to do better at NYU/CLS than at Chicago. I wouldn't ED Chicago unless it's your clear favorite among CCN. This is assuming your numbers are not so low that you don't really have a chance at NYU/CLS anyway. In that case, feel free to ED Chicago.
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Join us!Tiago Splitter wrote:After my 500th look at the LSN cycles of CCN over the last few years, I've decided that this is totally credited. I just gotta figure out if Chicago is really my first choice.soj wrote:On LSN, I've noticed that sub-3.5 splitters tend to do better at NYU/CLS than at Chicago. I wouldn't ED Chicago unless it's your clear favorite among CCN. This is assuming your numbers are not so low that you don't really have a chance at NYU/CLS anyway. In that case, feel free to ED Chicago.

Okay really gone now.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tmon
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks guys. I appreciate it. I haven't decided if I'm really into NYU enough to ED there instead of Chicago, but I guess I've got almost 2 months and a test to take before I have to figure out the strategy I'm going to take.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
NOTE: Transmission of electronic applications to this law school will begin on 9/15/2011 1:00:00 AM. Please return to this page at that time to transmit your application.
- kulshan
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Was there ever any consensus on how to avoid an error message in the academic awards section (Question 5 under Education)?
Are " and ' okay characters? Is there a character limit?
Edit: Apparently ' is not cool.
Are " and ' okay characters? Is there a character limit?
Edit: Apparently ' is not cool.
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So, Chicago asks that your resume include the number of hours spent per week on each job/activity. The application itself has a space for that, but I figure they want their instructions followed and for people to have that on their resume as well. My problem is that adding the hours spent would make my resume too crowded. Do you guys think it would be acceptable to replace:
Position -> Location -> Dates
with:
Position -> Hrs/wk -> Dates
I just don't know where else to put it that won't wreck the formatting. Maybe in the job description?
Position -> Location -> Dates
with:
Position -> Hrs/wk -> Dates
I just don't know where else to put it that won't wreck the formatting. Maybe in the job description?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login