Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum
- smdpnp
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Nope.
Last edited by smdpnp on Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
smdpnp wrote:There will be waves of WLs and dings in the next two weeks.chickpea wrote:I feel like they send DLS's pretty sporadically rather than in big waves.puppiespaws wrote:Does anyone know if Stanford does a wave of DLS, or are they, keeping with the theme I guess, more sporadic? I'm safe for right now, but I was just about to write up my LoCI and send it through. Think I should wait until the end of today? SHIT'S STRESSFUL, waiting to die, man lol.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
- HankBashir
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
JUST GOT THE CALL, I'M IN. My e-mail didnt' go lower case last night, haven't checked it today yet (I only check before bed)
- bluecouch
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yay! Congrats!HankBashir wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL, I'M IN. My e-mail didnt' go lower case last night, haven't checked it today yet (I only check before bed)
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Haha, it wasn't too much to type, so I thought, why not? Lol.
But thanks so much, all! I am in such shock right now! And for those that are curious, they told me on the phone that they just finished up their final review last night and are rushing to call people before ASW. So, I hope that adds to the pot of knowledge on here! Now, off to call my folks!
But thanks so much, all! I am in such shock right now! And for those that are curious, they told me on the phone that they just finished up their final review last night and are rushing to call people before ASW. So, I hope that adds to the pot of knowledge on here! Now, off to call my folks!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
.
Last edited by Lagunitan on Tue Apr 04, 2017 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
- chickpea
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Congrats!!HankBashir wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL, I'M IN. My e-mail didnt' go lower case last night, haven't checked it today yet (I only check before bed)
- smdpnp
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Nope.
Last edited by smdpnp on Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I agree that it's very difficult to standardize admissions to make it fair, but there are groups that are historically underrepresented in higher education which includes those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and certain ethnic minorities. If you've been reading the NYTimes, there seems to be an article every month or so talking about the barriers those from lower economic backgrounds face when gaining admission to elite colleges. I think this group in particular deserves to be included in the ABA URM report. I know law school admissions officers DO pay attention to economic background, but this group definitely doesn't get a legit URM boost. /2centsjbagelboy wrote:there are countless elements of law school admissions that are objectively unbalanced.. diversity is judged by how it is quantified in rankings, just like undergraduate gpas, which vary tremendously in rigor and significance. its a game you play with the cards handed to you -- if you overcame economic obstacles, that could work in your favor by checking off one box, but it will remain a different box from the diversity %'s listed in magazines and ABA reports.ssanonymous wrote: Random: I think law schools need to acknowledge those from low income backgrounds should be considered URMs. There's not much socio-economic diversity in these top schools.
I don't even think we could restandardize admissions to make them more "fair" no matter what was tried
But that's not to say I don't believe law schools should recruit ethnic URMs because most law schools have terrible minority percentages.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
...and that's the gameclouded.memory wrote:Haha, it wasn't too much to type, so I thought, why not? Lol.
But thanks so much, all! I am in such shock right now! And for those that are curious, they told me on the phone that they just finished up their final review last night and are rushing to call people before ASW. So, I hope that adds to the pot of knowledge on here! Now, off to call my folks!
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
FML! Grats all!smdpnp wrote:Game over, QQ.clouded.memory wrote: And for those that are curious, they told me on the phone that they just finished up their final review last night and are rushing to call people before ASW. So, I hope that adds to the pot of knowledge on here! Now, off to call my folks!
- Lighthouseman
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:20 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
GOT THE CALL!!!!!!!!!!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chickpea
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Congrats!!Lighthouseman wrote:GOT THE CALL!!!!!!!!!!!
- chickpea
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
game...set....match.... you win, S.anthony1027 wrote:...and that's the gameclouded.memory wrote:Haha, it wasn't too much to type, so I thought, why not? Lol.
But thanks so much, all! I am in such shock right now! And for those that are curious, they told me on the phone that they just finished up their final review last night and are rushing to call people before ASW. So, I hope that adds to the pot of knowledge on here! Now, off to call my folks!
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
It was a good run
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
gg. congrats to the final admits! I can operate under the assumption that my cycle is complete
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:06 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Congrats, you guys! I don't even think I'd be able to answer my phone, so kudos to you lol.
Well, if the ~final review is over with, should I even bother with an LoCI at this point? Because I could very easily continue to eat the rest of the sandwich for the time being instead, I mean.
Well, if the ~final review is over with, should I even bother with an LoCI at this point? Because I could very easily continue to eat the rest of the sandwich for the time being instead, I mean.
- smdpnp
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Enjoy the sandwich. Send the LOCI later this week.puppiespaws wrote:Congrats, you guys! I don't even think I'd be able to answer my phone, so kudos to you lol.
Well, if the ~final review is over with, should I even bother with an LoCI at this point? Because I could very easily continue to eat the rest of the sandwich for the time being instead, I mean.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I figure at this point they've decided if you are WL or ding. If I am WL, I will send an LOCI immediately when I find out. if ding, no point.puppiespaws wrote:Congrats, you guys! I don't even think I'd be able to answer my phone, so kudos to you lol.
Well, if the ~final review is over with, should I even bother with an LoCI at this point? Because I could very easily continue to eat the rest of the sandwich for the time being instead, I mean.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
samejbagelboy wrote:I figure at this point they've decided if you are WL or ding. If I am WL, I will send an LOCI immediately when I find out. if ding, no point.puppiespaws wrote:Congrats, you guys! I don't even think I'd be able to answer my phone, so kudos to you lol.
Well, if the ~final review is over with, should I even bother with an LoCI at this point? Because I could very easily continue to eat the rest of the sandwich for the time being instead, I mean.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:06 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
No DLS, no lower case. ugh Stanford seriously, seriously. I want it to be over....
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I'm very curious about this topic - I was raised in a low SES household by a single mother, and ended up at an elite undergrad. Now I'm here. I've outperformed my numbers a bit, and I wonder how much of that is the fact that part of my PS focused on my background.ssanonymous wrote:I agree that it's very difficult to standardize admissions to make it fair, but there are groups that are historically underrepresented in higher education which includes those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and certain ethnic minorities. If you've been reading the NYTimes, there seems to be an article every month or so talking about the barriers those from lower economic backgrounds face when gaining admission to elite colleges. I think this group in particular deserves to be included in the ABA URM report. I know law school admissions officers DO pay attention to economic background, but this group definitely doesn't get a legit URM boost. /2cents
But that's not to say I don't believe law schools should recruit ethnic URMs because most law schools have terrible minority percentages.
I'd agree it should be considered URM--I felt like an alien every day at my historically-rich college--but it's not quite as easy to quantify as race (despite the fact there are actual numbers attached). Most people consider themselves lower on the totem pole than they are; they can't be trusted to tick a "low SES" box on an application. If your parents make 100k+, you are in the wealthiest quintile, but those people consider themselves middle-class. People around the median income consider themselves lower-middle-class. And it varies depending on age; my mom made 15k-25k for most of my childhood+teenagedom--which is the lowest quintile, albeit barely--but moved up big-time after I left for college, and now she makes 60k. Would I qualify for hypothetical low-SES URM status?
Back on topic: congrats, all who've gotten calls today. Still waiting here. Complete late Dec, UR since mid-Jan.
edited because grammar.
Last edited by beepboopbeep on Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
FYI, last year there was a DLS wave the evening of the URM wave.
Ready for this to end, I guess...
Ready for this to end, I guess...

- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Um, yeah, seriously. How long does it take to update the system? If it's over, it's over, I just want to know!andreskicdo wrote:No DLS, no lower case. ugh Stanford seriously, seriously. I want it to be over....
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login