I wore what I had on for work that day, which was a nicely pressed shirt and tie with a v-neck sweater. I thought a suit might be overkill, but I didn't think about it much at all - it was just easier to wear what I had on for work, because honestly I highly doubt it matters that much unless it's a t-shirt and jeans. I will say my interviewer was fairly casually dressed, so don't think of it as a highly formal setting.paglababa wrote:What did you guys wear on skype? Full Suit with tie? Would shirt/blazer combo work without tie?
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You fancy. I had to google french cuffs and trinity knot to even know what you were talking aboutjingosaur wrote:I wore a full suit with a tie. Always dress your best at interviews. I even experimented with the Trinity Knot for my tie.paglababa wrote:What did you guys wear on skype? Full Suit with tie? Would shirt/blazer combo work without tie?
At my Wharton interview, I went with french cuffs and a Trinity Knot and I'll let you know how that worked out soon.

EDIT: To help others: I wore a full suit as well. Don't think it matters so long as you look professional. I wore full suit because that's what I would wear to OCI. Also, tested it in my camera and it looked better.
- Happy Gilmore
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Clearly JS has found away to determine all the applicants that read TLS and has decided to deny or wait list us all. That's the theory I am going with to explain why there hasn't been a second wave yet.
-
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Wore a polo and jeans…it's a law school admissions interview that is supposed to be fairly low key. Guess we'll find out if that killed me haha.lawschool22 wrote:I wore what I had on for work that day, which was a nicely pressed shirt and tie with a v-neck sweater. I thought a suit might be overkill, but I didn't think about it much at all - it was just easier to wear what I had on for work, because honestly I highly doubt it matters that much unless it's a t-shirt and jeans. I will say my interviewer was fairly casually dressed, so don't think of it as a highly formal setting.paglababa wrote:What did you guys wear on skype? Full Suit with tie? Would shirt/blazer combo work without tie?
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
How many of us will spontaneously combust if there aren't any JS2s this week?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
They HAVE to be this week. I can't imagine them going on break without another wave...can they?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:How many of us will spontaneously combust if there aren't any JS2s this week?

- dobryden
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I really think I might. Spreading holiday cheer through being the open fire over which everyone can roast chestnuts?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:How many of us will spontaneously combust if there aren't any JS2s this week?
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
*cue panic*lawschool22 wrote:They HAVE to be this week. I can't imagine them going on break without another wave...can they?TheMostDangerousLG wrote:How many of us will spontaneously combust if there aren't any JS2s this week?
- Sourrudedude
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Entirely appropriate, some people just like to go overboard.Instinctive wrote:Wore a polo and jeans…it's a law school admissions interview that is supposed to be fairly low key. Guess we'll find out if that killed me haha.lawschool22 wrote:I wore what I had on for work that day, which was a nicely pressed shirt and tie with a v-neck sweater. I thought a suit might be overkill, but I didn't think about it much at all - it was just easier to wear what I had on for work, because honestly I highly doubt it matters that much unless it's a t-shirt and jeans. I will say my interviewer was fairly casually dressed, so don't think of it as a highly formal setting.paglababa wrote:What did you guys wear on skype? Full Suit with tie? Would shirt/blazer combo work without tie?
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'd literally cry if TLS kept me out of Harvard. It would kind of suck because TLS telling me to retake was what made me competitive for Harvard in the first place.Happy Gilmore wrote:Clearly JS has found away to determine all the applicants that read TLS and has decided to deny or wait list us all. That's the theory I am going with to explain why there hasn't been a second wave yet.
-
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I know. She actually commented on the shirt (it's for an org I'm a leader in) and it segued perfectly into some resume item discussion. Of course, it probably doesn't hurt to overdress, and I have a very different plan for MBA interviews.Sourrudedude wrote:Entirely appropriate, some people just like to go overboard.Instinctive wrote:Wore a polo and jeans…it's a law school admissions interview that is supposed to be fairly low key. Guess we'll find out if that killed me haha.lawschool22 wrote:I wore what I had on for work that day, which was a nicely pressed shirt and tie with a v-neck sweater. I thought a suit might be overkill, but I didn't think about it much at all - it was just easier to wear what I had on for work, because honestly I highly doubt it matters that much unless it's a t-shirt and jeans. I will say my interviewer was fairly casually dressed, so don't think of it as a highly formal setting.paglababa wrote:What did you guys wear on skype? Full Suit with tie? Would shirt/blazer combo work without tie?
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Were there 3 waves by this time last year?
- 2x2Matrix
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:37 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
this is a pro moveInstinctive wrote: I know. She actually commented on the shirt (it's for an org I'm a leader in) and it segued perfectly into some resume item discussion. Of course, it probably doesn't hurt to overdress, and I have a very different plan for MBA interviews.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Wear a suit on top but only boxers on the bottom. It will remind you of how under control you have everything.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Credited.TripTrip wrote:Wear a suit on top but only boxers on the bottom. It will remind you of how under control you have everything.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
On a serious note though, do wear a suit with a tie. A huge reason for the interviews is to see how well you would do in a firm interview. In a firm interview, you'll wear a suit with a tie. HLS wants to see that you know how to dress your best for a job interview, because how well you do in job interviews will affect their employment numbers. It's not a question of whether the interview is supposed to be casual. Yes, the conversation will be casual and friendly, just like it might be in a job interview. That doesn't mean you don't dress your best and go all the way.
What I'm saying is this: if you have a pocket square, put it in your pocket.
What I'm saying is this: if you have a pocket square, put it in your pocket.
- crazyrobin
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:52 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+12x2Matrix wrote:this is a pro moveInstinctive wrote: I know. She actually commented on the shirt (it's for an org I'm a leader in) and it segued perfectly into some resume item discussion. Of course, it probably doesn't hurt to overdress, and I have a very different plan for MBA interviews.
That's smart!!!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- CitrusFruit
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
this guy probably wore a suit to college campus toursTripTrip wrote:On a serious note though, do wear a suit with a tie. A huge reason for the interviews is to see how well you would do in a firm interview. In a firm interview, you'll wear a suit with a tie. HLS wants to see that you know how to dress your best for a job interview, because how well you do in job interviews will affect their employment numbers. It's not a question of whether the interview is supposed to be casual. Yes, the conversation will be casual and friendly, just like it might be in a job interview. That doesn't mean you don't dress your best and go all the way.
What I'm saying is this: if you have a pocket square, put it in your pocket.

- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
- ShrimpToastMasters
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I am predicting that nothing will happen today.
- almondjoy
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:35 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
ShrimpToastMasters wrote:I am predicting that nothing will happen today.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crazyrobin
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:52 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
CitrusFruit wrote:this guy probably wore a suit to college campus toursTripTrip wrote:On a serious note though, do wear a suit with a tie. A huge reason for the interviews is to see how well you would do in a firm interview. In a firm interview, you'll wear a suit with a tie. HLS wants to see that you know how to dress your best for a job interview, because how well you do in job interviews will affect their employment numbers. It's not a question of whether the interview is supposed to be casual. Yes, the conversation will be casual and friendly, just like it might be in a job interview. That doesn't mean you don't dress your best and go all the way.
What I'm saying is this: if you have a pocket square, put it in your pocket.

But seriously, I feel comfortable when wearing a suit.
Blazer and shirt can fit in many, if not all, occasions.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
ShrimpToastMasters wrote:I am predicting that nothing will happen today.
- CitrusFruit
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
yep.andapieceoftoast wrote:ShrimpToastMasters wrote:I am predicting that nothing will happen today.
- Luchi91
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Haven't been rejected! Not sure if it's because my app is still in line to be reviewed or because they're having mercy on me haha
My online checker-
Status: Application Complete
Current Status Date: 11/8/2013
Waiting and praying!
My online checker-
Status: Application Complete
Current Status Date: 11/8/2013
Waiting and praying!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login