Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yeah, everytime I look at HYS admits on LSN who actually list their softs I wonder why I'm even applying.
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
+1. Much respect to Eagle Scouts. GPA - check; Softs - check.whereskyle wrote:anthony1027 wrote:Fingers crossed for a URM wave.
holy sh*t do those softs look good.
How the hell were you rejected from Harvard? LSAT? Good thing Stanford is generally known to be more holistic.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
And they don't even think their softs are that good... the distortion in perception is cray.sinfiery wrote:Yeah, everytime I look at HYS admits on LSN who actually list their softs I wonder why I'm even applying.
- digifly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yup.sinfiery wrote:Yeah, everytime I look at HYS admits on LSN who actually list their softs I wonder why I'm even applying.
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Haha, yep. Though I'm sure TLS is in part to blame for that.carboncopyx wrote: And they don't even think their softs are that good... the distortion in perception is cray.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
whatever happened to appreciation for the simple grace of being marginally above average?
people are trying too hard at life these days for real
people are trying too hard at life these days for real
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
To make our dream schools' yields look sexier.sinfiery wrote:Yeah, everytime I look at HYS admits on LSN who actually list their softs I wonder why I'm even applying.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Can someone seriously explain to me why at this point we dont have an answer? Acceptance, DLS, WL... I would love to go to SLS, I am just a bit confused as to whats going on in the process? Any insight...
Edit..I have received an answer from every school so far, to include berks faculty review & HLS Hold->ding....but not SLS
Edit..I have received an answer from every school so far, to include berks faculty review & HLS Hold->ding....but not SLS
Last edited by matrim on Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
same here. in fact, same with most people still trolling this thread. that said, I would wait till Sep 1 for stanfordmatrim wrote:Can someone seriously explain to me why at this point we dont have an answer? Acceptance, DLS, WL... I would love to go to SLS, I am just a bit confused as to whats going on in the process? Any insight...
Edit..I have received an answer from every school so far, to include berks faculty reviewv& HLS Hold->Ding....but not SLS
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Ditto. They seem to like to ensure that people's cycles never end. Ever.jbagelboy wrote:same here. in fact, same with most people still trolling this thread. that said, I would wait till Sep 1 for stanfordmatrim wrote:Can someone seriously explain to me why at this point we dont have an answer? Acceptance, DLS, WL... I would love to go to SLS, I am just a bit confused as to whats going on in the process? Any insight...
Edit..I have received an answer from every school so far, to include berks faculty reviewv& HLS Hold->Ding....but not SLS
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I can't wait that long...just not an optionjbagelboy wrote: same here. in fact, same with most people still trolling this thread. that said, I would wait till Sep 1 for stanford
Edit: Dont get me wrong, SLS is my number 1 choice (as I am sure it is for many), but do they really need a year to get a decision out?
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
You'll likely hear back by the end of this week/early next week if dinged and by the end of the month if WL. But yeah, I'd totally ride a WL til Sept 1.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
remember its not really 'getting a decision out', its more seeing which better candidates decline the offer first. nearly anyone admitted from now on are not their first choice class, but with a matriculation rate of under 50% they don't get that first choice class. again, I would also be perfectly happy as worst among the accepted students -- sliding right in there under the radar.matrim wrote:I can't wait that long...just not an optionjbagelboy wrote: same here. in fact, same with most people still trolling this thread. that said, I would wait till Sep 1 for stanford
Edit: Dont get me wrong, SLS is my number 1 choice (as I am sure it is for many), but do they really need a year to get a decision out?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:11 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
.
Last edited by mambar on Thu Jun 01, 2017 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I prefer inspiring. in the end, if you get in you are sls class of 2016, if you don't you won't be, and come first day of class it won't make a shit of differencemambar wrote:haha what a depressing thoughtjbagelboy wrote:remember its not really 'getting a decision out', its more seeing which better candidates decline the offer first. nearly anyone admitted from now on are not their first choice class, but with a matriculation rate of under 50% they don't get that first choice class. again, I would also be perfectly happy as worst among the accepted students -- sliding right in there under the radar.matrim wrote:I can't wait that long...just not an optionjbagelboy wrote: same here. in fact, same with most people still trolling this thread. that said, I would wait till Sep 1 for stanford
Edit: Dont get me wrong, SLS is my number 1 choice (as I am sure it is for many), but do they really need a year to get a decision out?
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I guess thats a valid perspective jbagelboy. And I am with you on flying under the radar. I am older applicant with family and deadlines, so I cant wait until Sept. I just hope this week we close things out. Any chance at Acceptances this week? Looking last year, there seemed to be a final two days of calls, before the end.jbagelboy wrote:remember its not really 'getting a decision out', its more seeing which better candidates decline the offer first. nearly anyone admitted from now on are not their first choice class, but with a matriculation rate of under 50% they don't get that first choice class. again, I would also be perfectly happy as worst among the accepted students -- sliding right in there under the radar.matrim wrote:I can't wait that long...just not an optionjbagelboy wrote: same here. in fact, same with most people still trolling this thread. that said, I would wait till Sep 1 for stanford
Edit: Dont get me wrong, SLS is my number 1 choice (as I am sure it is for many), but do they really need a year to get a decision out?
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:13 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
not sure if I buy this email theory, my email addresses turned lowercase Friday and I have not heard anything. 

Last edited by dukie4 on Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
dukie4 wrote:not sure if I buys this email theory, my email addresses turned lowercase Friday and I have not heard anything.
never second guess the lowercase theory
You'll probably be getting a call soon
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
163 on the LSAT. Pretty much screwed me overdnptan wrote:+1. Much respect to Eagle Scouts. GPA - check; Softs - check.whereskyle wrote:anthony1027 wrote:Fingers crossed for a URM wave.
holy sh*t do those softs look good.
How the hell were you rejected from Harvard? LSAT? Good thing Stanford is generally known to be more holistic.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
your berkeley and nyu offers are amazing. that said, and I'm sure people have told you this before, if you got 170 in june and reapplied you would be yale class of 2017anthony1027 wrote:163 on the LSAT. Pretty much screwed me overdnptan wrote:+1. Much respect to Eagle Scouts. GPA - check; Softs - check.whereskyle wrote:anthony1027 wrote:Fingers crossed for a URM wave.
holy sh*t do those softs look good.
How the hell were you rejected from Harvard? LSAT? Good thing Stanford is generally known to be more holistic.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I'm going to be that guy but the SLS is legit down. I really hope that doesn't mean DLS are going out.
On the topic of softs: The reason applicants aren't wowed by their own softs is because there are Rhodes scholars among us and people who have started their own non-profits at the age of 10 or something. These people exist, and they're all chilling at HYS.
On the topic of softs: The reason applicants aren't wowed by their own softs is because there are Rhodes scholars among us and people who have started their own non-profits at the age of 10 or something. These people exist, and they're all chilling at HYS.
Last edited by ssanonymous on Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Not down, but it has been awhile since a website comment.ssanonymous wrote:I'm going to be that guy but the SLS is legit down. I really hope that doesn't mean DLS are going out.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Restarted computer. It worked. Anyway, carry on.jselson wrote:Not down, but it has been awhile since a website comment.ssanonymous wrote:I'm going to be that guy but the SLS is legit down. I really hope that doesn't mean DLS are going out.
Last edited by ssanonymous on Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Exactly. Nothing like finding out your fellow applicant has a Ph.D. and saved a village in southern Africa from starvation to really make this 20 yr old with "leadership experience" sound impressive.ssanonymous wrote:I'm going to be that guy but the SLS is legit down. I really hope that doesn't mean DLS are going out.
On the topic of softs: The reason applicants aren't wowed by their own softs is because there are Rhodes scholars among us and people who have started their own non-profits at the age of 10 or something. These people exist, and they're all chilling at HYS.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I also think younger applicants must keep age in perspective, because law schools certanly do, or else no k-jds would ever get into HYS. for example, I've worked non-stop (summers & during school) from senior year of high school to my post-grad fulltime job now, so I think I've taken advantage of the time I've had. Obviously if I was several years older, I would have done more shit, like extra degrees, more promotions, more volunteer work, ect. As long as you've stayed fruitfully occupied during the time you've been on this earth, you shouldn't feel badly compared to those who have been on it longeranthony1027 wrote:Exactly. Nothing like finding out your fellow applicant has a Ph.D. and saved a village in southern Africa from starvation to really make this 20 yr old with "leadership experience" sound impressive.ssanonymous wrote:I'm going to be that guy but the SLS is legit down. I really hope that doesn't mean DLS are going out.
On the topic of softs: The reason applicants aren't wowed by their own softs is because there are Rhodes scholars among us and people who have started their own non-profits at the age of 10 or something. These people exist, and they're all chilling at HYS.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login