Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
NJPitcher

- Posts: 146
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:29 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Got a fee waiver and applied a month ago. Rejected today, pretty expected. At least they got back to me quickly?
3.18/173/non-URM/haven't cured cancer.
3.18/173/non-URM/haven't cured cancer.
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
- Champion

- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
After checking out LSN as a 10/25 submit who hasn't been rejected or waitlisted yet, I'm guessing that bodes well. Hopefully I can get some love from Columbia in the next few weeks (or months).
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dude, I'm only a 176. Also, based on last year, it looked like 3.5+ and 175-177 all had the same outcomes.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
me!0712

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I hadn't been checking my email and I checked it today to find an email from Columbia saying that I had been held
Im sure this has been discussed in this thread but I haven't/don't have time to read through the 118 pages, does anybody know what being reserved really even means or how many people get admitted off of the reserve group? ?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
it's rare to get in off CLS's reserve.me!0712 wrote:I hadn't been checking my email and I checked it today to find an email from Columbia saying that I had been heldIm sure this has been discussed in this thread but I haven't/don't have time to read through the 118 pages, does anybody know what being reserved really even means or how many people get admitted off of the reserve group? ?
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Cross our fingers that this trend continues.JamMasterJ wrote:dude, I'm only a 176. Also, based on last year, it looked like 3.5+ and 175-177 all had the same outcomes.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hmm. Not sure what exactly I was talking about...sounds stupid. Although, looking at the graphs again, I think I was referring to THIS cycle, not last.JamMasterJ wrote:dude, I'm only a 176. Also, based on last year, it looked like 3.5+ and 175-177 all had the same outcomes.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
Also, I think being anywhere above a 75th is essentially the same thing. It doesn't really have an impact on their rankings, does it? Same goes for being below a median. The point was: if you could have done anything about your (relatively) low GPA, it was knock one out the park on the LSAT, which you did.
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Does Columbia's status checker change based on your decision? I won't be home for a week to check my mail, and I was wondering if I could see my decision via the status check.
- yankees42789

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:51 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nope. Columbia's status checker is pretty much useless. Once you go complete, it permanently stays that way.kuddlykoala wrote:Does Columbia's status checker change based on your decision? I won't be home for a week to check my mail, and I was wondering if I could see my decision via the status check.
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
oh all right. Sigh, I'm going to have to be patient. Thanks!
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
Hmm. Not sure what exactly I was talking about...sounds stupid. Although, looking at the graphs again, I think I was referring to THIS cycle, not last.
Also, I think being anywhere above a 75th is essentially the same thing. It doesn't really have an impact on their rankings, does it? Same goes for being below a median. The point was: if you could have done anything about your (relatively) low GPA, it was knock one out the park on the LSAT, which you did.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
in reference to my stats
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
-
seanPtheB

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
made me lol for some reason. like that's not quite as much of a boost as all blacksharktankdean wrote:in reference to my stats
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
congrats btw!
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
seanPtheB wrote:made me lol for some reason. like that's not quite as much of a boost as all blacksharktankdean wrote:in reference to my stats
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
congrats btw!
lol. i guess I'm just used to saying that all the time. I have to represent both sides.
- Elliott_Smith

- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:34 am
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- catwomangirl

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So is today the day folks?
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes.catwomangirl wrote:So is today the day folks?
-
zylaxice

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
DING letter in my mailbox today. Not at all surprising. Good luck to everyone still waiting on decisions!
- fingerscrossedxx

- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:56 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dinged in the mail today. This one stings a little since I was accepted here last year. Oh well 
ETA: Submitted 10/14 Complete 10/25
ETA: Submitted 10/14 Complete 10/25
Last edited by fingerscrossedxx on Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
lawhaus

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:08 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
sorry to hear, mind if I asked for your app sent/complete dates?
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No mail in the ol' box 
-
sports

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oddly slow day on TLS. I might have to notice some meaningless change in wording on the status checker to get things moving
- Champion

- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
10/25 submit and I have been accepted, rejected, or waitlisted. What's going on. People who've applied before and after according to LSN have been receiving either of the three decisions.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
