Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
NJPitcher

- Posts: 146
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:29 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Got a fee waiver and applied a month ago. Rejected today, pretty expected. At least they got back to me quickly?
3.18/173/non-URM/haven't cured cancer.
3.18/173/non-URM/haven't cured cancer.
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
- Champion

- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
After checking out LSN as a 10/25 submit who hasn't been rejected or waitlisted yet, I'm guessing that bodes well. Hopefully I can get some love from Columbia in the next few weeks (or months).
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dude, I'm only a 176. Also, based on last year, it looked like 3.5+ and 175-177 all had the same outcomes.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
-
me!0712

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I hadn't been checking my email and I checked it today to find an email from Columbia saying that I had been held
Im sure this has been discussed in this thread but I haven't/don't have time to read through the 118 pages, does anybody know what being reserved really even means or how many people get admitted off of the reserve group? ?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
it's rare to get in off CLS's reserve.me!0712 wrote:I hadn't been checking my email and I checked it today to find an email from Columbia saying that I had been heldIm sure this has been discussed in this thread but I haven't/don't have time to read through the 118 pages, does anybody know what being reserved really even means or how many people get admitted off of the reserve group? ?
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Cross our fingers that this trend continues.JamMasterJ wrote:dude, I'm only a 176. Also, based on last year, it looked like 3.5+ and 175-177 all had the same outcomes.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hmm. Not sure what exactly I was talking about...sounds stupid. Although, looking at the graphs again, I think I was referring to THIS cycle, not last.JamMasterJ wrote:dude, I'm only a 176. Also, based on last year, it looked like 3.5+ and 175-177 all had the same outcomes.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Yes of course.FryBreadPower wrote:I'm assuming this is only for non-URM?WhiteGuy5 wrote: And on that note Jams, anyone with a 3.5 seems to require a 177 on the LSAT according to last cycle. So you did what you had to do on the LSAT; you should just hang back, relax, and wait at this point. This cycle is weird as is.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1011/
Also, I think being anywhere above a 75th is essentially the same thing. It doesn't really have an impact on their rankings, does it? Same goes for being below a median. The point was: if you could have done anything about your (relatively) low GPA, it was knock one out the park on the LSAT, which you did.
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Does Columbia's status checker change based on your decision? I won't be home for a week to check my mail, and I was wondering if I could see my decision via the status check.
- yankees42789

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:51 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nope. Columbia's status checker is pretty much useless. Once you go complete, it permanently stays that way.kuddlykoala wrote:Does Columbia's status checker change based on your decision? I won't be home for a week to check my mail, and I was wondering if I could see my decision via the status check.
- kuddlykoala

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:29 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
oh all right. Sigh, I'm going to have to be patient. Thanks!
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
Hmm. Not sure what exactly I was talking about...sounds stupid. Although, looking at the graphs again, I think I was referring to THIS cycle, not last.
Also, I think being anywhere above a 75th is essentially the same thing. It doesn't really have an impact on their rankings, does it? Same goes for being below a median. The point was: if you could have done anything about your (relatively) low GPA, it was knock one out the park on the LSAT, which you did.
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
in reference to my stats
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
-
seanPtheB

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
made me lol for some reason. like that's not quite as much of a boost as all blacksharktankdean wrote:in reference to my stats
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
congrats btw!
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
seanPtheB wrote:made me lol for some reason. like that's not quite as much of a boost as all blacksharktankdean wrote:in reference to my stats
3.83/167/URM (half white & half black)
it was post marked 2/2...i dont know why it took so long to get to california though...
congrats btw!
lol. i guess I'm just used to saying that all the time. I have to represent both sides.
- Elliott_Smith

- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:34 am
- catwomangirl

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So is today the day folks?
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes.catwomangirl wrote:So is today the day folks?
-
zylaxice

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
DING letter in my mailbox today. Not at all surprising. Good luck to everyone still waiting on decisions!
- fingerscrossedxx

- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:56 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dinged in the mail today. This one stings a little since I was accepted here last year. Oh well 
ETA: Submitted 10/14 Complete 10/25
ETA: Submitted 10/14 Complete 10/25
Last edited by fingerscrossedxx on Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
lawhaus

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:08 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
sorry to hear, mind if I asked for your app sent/complete dates?
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No mail in the ol' box 
-
sports

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oddly slow day on TLS. I might have to notice some meaningless change in wording on the status checker to get things moving
- Champion

- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
10/25 submit and I have been accepted, rejected, or waitlisted. What's going on. People who've applied before and after according to LSN have been receiving either of the three decisions.
