Shotty Mick Foley. You can be the Rock.birdlaw117 wrote:Tag teaming is my preferred method of doing business.JamMasterJ wrote:tag team that business!!!Yeshia90 wrote:
I got this.

Shotty Mick Foley. You can be the Rock.birdlaw117 wrote:Tag teaming is my preferred method of doing business.JamMasterJ wrote:tag team that business!!!Yeshia90 wrote:
I got this.
but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good nowYeshia90 wrote:Shotty Mick Foley. You can be the Rock.birdlaw117 wrote:Tag teaming is my preferred method of doing business.JamMasterJ wrote:tag team that business!!!Yeshia90 wrote:
I got this.
I wish I could tell you that I think it matters. And I mean, it might marginally help now. But odds are you're going to be someone they use for an LSAT boost. I would write a why NYU now, and do a LOCI later. Hell, you can do a LOCI and a Why NYU now, and a different LOCI later. If you look back at NeonX's cycle last year, he way outperformed and he wrote the shit out of LOCIs.JamMasterJ wrote: but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good now
thanks bird, that's probably what I'll dobirdlaw117 wrote:I wish I could tell you that I think it matters. And I mean, it might marginally help now. But odds are you're going to be someone they use for an LSAT boost. I would write a why NYU now, and do a LOCI later. Hell, you can do a LOCI and a Why NYU now, and a different LOCI later. If you look back at NeonX's cycle last year, he way outperformed and he wrote the shit out of LOCIs.JamMasterJ wrote: but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good now
Also, when you get in, let me know and I can help you out with additional info. Because you will get in.JamMasterJ wrote:thanks bird, that's probably what I'll dobirdlaw117 wrote:I wish I could tell you that I think it matters. And I mean, it might marginally help now. But odds are you're going to be someone they use for an LSAT boost. I would write a why NYU now, and do a LOCI later. Hell, you can do a LOCI and a Why NYU now, and a different LOCI later. If you look back at NeonX's cycle last year, he way outperformed and he wrote the shit out of LOCIs.JamMasterJ wrote: but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good now
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Correct me if I'm wrong... but international applicants don't have GPAs... right? Maybe Canada? I don't know...madvillain wrote:I'm wondering if I could get some advice here. So I've been under review since October. I have a 179/3.86. Still no decision. What should I do? I don't feel particularly keen on writing a LOCI and I'm really confused as to what I should have expected at all for my cycle. Just sort of paralyzed right now with disappointment. I'm international if that helps.
do you think I should be calling them?birdlaw117 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong... but international applicants don't have GPAs... right? Maybe Canada? I don't know...madvillain wrote:I'm wondering if I could get some advice here. So I've been under review since October. I have a 179/3.86. Still no decision. What should I do? I don't feel particularly keen on writing a LOCI and I'm really confused as to what I should have expected at all for my cycle. Just sort of paralyzed right now with disappointment. I'm international if that helps.
I would just call them and see what's up.
I mean, if you want. I can tell you what they'll say. They're gonna say that they are reviewing your application and you'll get a decision by the end of April or some shit like that. It never hurts to call, because you won't be talking to someone that makes decisions, and just in case it was something clerical (very unlikely). Doesn't hurt though.JamMasterJ wrote:do you think I should be calling them?birdlaw117 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong... but international applicants don't have GPAs... right? Maybe Canada? I don't know...madvillain wrote:I'm wondering if I could get some advice here. So I've been under review since October. I have a 179/3.86. Still no decision. What should I do? I don't feel particularly keen on writing a LOCI and I'm really confused as to what I should have expected at all for my cycle. Just sort of paralyzed right now with disappointment. I'm international if that helps.
I would just call them and see what's up.
yeah, that's what I assumed.birdlaw117 wrote:I mean, if you want. I can tell you what they'll say. They're gonna say that they are reviewing your application and you'll get a decision by the end of April or some shit like that. It never hurts to call, because you won't be talking to someone that makes decisions, and just in case it was something clerical (very unlikely). Doesn't hurt though.JamMasterJ wrote:do you think I should be calling them?birdlaw117 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong... but international applicants don't have GPAs... right? Maybe Canada? I don't know...madvillain wrote:I'm wondering if I could get some advice here. So I've been under review since October. I have a 179/3.86. Still no decision. What should I do? I don't feel particularly keen on writing a LOCI and I'm really confused as to what I should have expected at all for my cycle. Just sort of paralyzed right now with disappointment. I'm international if that helps.
I would just call them and see what's up.
I would agree. Also, sorry that my post sounded sort accusatory, not how I meant it. I was just confused. But yeah, your case definitely seems unusual to me. A LOCI wouldn't hurt, calling wouldn't hurt. Really just do something so they grab your file again.madvillain wrote:Apologies for the confusion. I attended a Canadian university so the GPA does convert. The 3.86 was what LSAC gave me. But yeah, probably no point really asking for help since my case seems to be so different from the norm.
If you'd been dinged somewhere, I'd agree--you could ask what's wrong with your application, or whatever. But because you've been WL'd everywhere, you can't really ask.JamMasterJ wrote:do you think I should be calling them?birdlaw117 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong... but international applicants don't have GPAs... right? Maybe Canada? I don't know...madvillain wrote:I'm wondering if I could get some advice here. So I've been under review since October. I have a 179/3.86. Still no decision. What should I do? I don't feel particularly keen on writing a LOCI and I'm really confused as to what I should have expected at all for my cycle. Just sort of paralyzed right now with disappointment. I'm international if that helps.
I would just call them and see what's up.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
well I got dinged at Harvard...Yeshia90 wrote:If you'd been dinged somewhere, I'd agree--you could ask what's wrong with your application, or whatever. But because you've been WL'd everywhere, you can't really ask.JamMasterJ wrote:do you think I should be calling them?birdlaw117 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong... but international applicants don't have GPAs... right? Maybe Canada? I don't know...madvillain wrote:I'm wondering if I could get some advice here. So I've been under review since October. I have a 179/3.86. Still no decision. What should I do? I don't feel particularly keen on writing a LOCI and I'm really confused as to what I should have expected at all for my cycle. Just sort of paralyzed right now with disappointment. I'm international if that helps.
I would just call them and see what's up.
Yeah, but their answer would be that you're not Harvard material. If, like, Cornell or even NYU had dinged you, you'd know something weird was going on. I'm absolutely positive you'll end up in the same place we figured you'd end up, but the process is significantly more agitating. But in the end, you'll be fine.JamMasterJ wrote:well I got dinged at Harvard...Yeshia90 wrote:If you'd been dinged somewhere, I'd agree--you could ask what's wrong with your application, or whatever. But because you've been WL'd everywhere, you can't really ask.JamMasterJ wrote:
do you think I should be calling them?
thanks dude!!! Hopefully I get in to NYU in time for ASWYeshia90 wrote:Yeah, but their answer would be that you're not Harvard material. If, like, Cornell or even NYU had dinged you, you'd know something weird was going on. I'm absolutely positive you'll end up in the same place we figured you'd end up, but the process is significantly more agitating. But in the end, you'll be fine.JamMasterJ wrote:well I got dinged at Harvard...Yeshia90 wrote:If you'd been dinged somewhere, I'd agree--you could ask what's wrong with your application, or whatever. But because you've been WL'd everywhere, you can't really ask.JamMasterJ wrote:
do you think I should be calling them?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Haven't heard anything, and based on last year's threads, don't believe we will until around Aprillawschoolgal12 wrote:anyone know when they usually start giving responses to deferred ED applicants? or when they start to re-review? have any deffered EDers heard anything? thanks!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
FYI in case you missed it, somebody with a November UR got in yesterday. There's still hopeJamMasterJ wrote:but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good now
didn't see that. Tso excite!Mr. Somebody wrote:FYI in case you missed it, somebody with a November UR got in yesterday. There's still hopeJamMasterJ wrote:but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good now
It was this personJamMasterJ wrote:didn't see that. Tso excite!Mr. Somebody wrote:FYI in case you missed it, somebody with a November UR got in yesterday. There's still hopeJamMasterJ wrote:but seriously, I think it's almost time for me to write a Why NYU. I was planning on waiting until the waitlist, but I wonder if it would do more good now
numbers?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login