Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
niederbomb

Silver
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by niederbomb » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:26 am

Knock wrote:
niederbomb wrote:Why is Stanford's median LSAT so low?

I am 170, 3.9X, but I have another, lower LSAT in the low 160's from October. However, I had to fly to a different country to take it, so I noted that on my addendum.

Seriously, any chance at Stanford? Just went complete. Of course I'd go there at sticker if I got in.
You have a chance, but SLS softs and the entire application package is important.
What kind of softs? Do they have to be academic softs? Besides a high GPA, I don't have much in this area. My UG school was a small, private religious school, and I don't have a Masters, never got anything published, but I've had some interesting work experience + a very interesting life story. I got into Penn 3 weeks after applying in late January. Not sure if it means anything though. Stanford >>>>>>>>>Penn.

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by Knock » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:31 am

niederbomb wrote:
Knock wrote:
niederbomb wrote:Why is Stanford's median LSAT so low?

I am 170, 3.9X, but I have another, lower LSAT in the low 160's from October. However, I had to fly to a different country to take it, so I noted that on my addendum.

Seriously, any chance at Stanford? Just went complete. Of course I'd go there at sticker if I got in.
You have a chance, but SLS softs and the entire application package is important.
What kind of softs? Do they have to be academic softs? Besides a high GPA, I don't have much in this area. My UG school was a small, private religious school, and I don't have a Masters, never got anything published, but I've had some interesting work experience + a very interesting life story. I got into Penn 3 weeks after applying in late January. Not sure if it means anything though. Stanford >>>>>>>>>Penn.
It's really hard to say, there's no one size fit all softs that will get someone in, that's why SLS has a reputation of being somewhat of a black box for admissions. Your quick turnaround on Penn isn't likely indicative of anything except Penn liked your application.

jrose5

Silver
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:54 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by jrose5 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:36 am

Knock wrote:
niederbomb wrote:
Knock wrote:
niederbomb wrote:Why is Stanford's median LSAT so low?

I am 170, 3.9X, but I have another, lower LSAT in the low 160's from October. However, I had to fly to a different country to take it, so I noted that on my addendum.

Seriously, any chance at Stanford? Just went complete. Of course I'd go there at sticker if I got in.
You have a chance, but SLS softs and the entire application package is important.
What kind of softs? Do they have to be academic softs? Besides a high GPA, I don't have much in this area. My UG school was a small, private religious school, and I don't have a Masters, never got anything published, but I've had some interesting work experience + a very interesting life story. I got into Penn 3 weeks after applying in late January. Not sure if it means anything though. Stanford >>>>>>>>>Penn.
It's really hard to say, there's no one size fit all softs that will get someone in, that's why SLS has a reputation of being somewhat of a black box for admissions. Your quick turnaround on Penn isn't likely indicative of anything except Penn liked your application.
+1

Hate to break it to you, but I don't think it shows much aside from the fact that you may have a strong, overall application. However, history has shown us that this alone is not sufficient for admission to SLS... they are known to be somewhat of a black box, as the poster above said.

Try to be patient! Be glad you have Penn at least - some of us applied earlier and are still waiting! :D

User avatar
niederbomb

Silver
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by niederbomb » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:52 am

Hate to break it to you, but I don't think it shows much aside from the fact that you may have a strong, overall application. However, history has shown us that this alone is not sufficient for admission to SLS... they are known to be somewhat of a black box, as the poster above said.

Try to be patient! Be glad you have Penn at least - some of us applied earlier and are still waiting! :D
Black box is right. Here's a non-URM who was outright rejected from UVA and Penn who got into Stanford.

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined/jd

I guess S doesn't even care about GPA as much as people say.

I was pretty happy to go complete at Stanford. My Dean's Cert and Statement of Instructor were sent back in August, and I applied in late January. I was afraid they had discarded them.

I didn't expect to get in anywhere this cycle. But my 3-day turnaround at Vandy, 6 days at UT, and 24 days at Penn have given me hope.

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by Knock » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:54 am

niederbomb wrote:
Hate to break it to you, but I don't think it shows much aside from the fact that you may have a strong, overall application. However, history has shown us that this alone is not sufficient for admission to SLS... they are known to be somewhat of a black box, as the poster above said.

Try to be patient! Be glad you have Penn at least - some of us applied earlier and are still waiting! :D
Black box is right. Here's a non-URM who was outright rejected from UVA and Penn who got into Stanford.

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined/jd

I guess S doesn't even care about GPA as much as people say.

I was pretty happy to go complete at Stanford. My Dean's Cert and Statement of Instructor were sent back in August, and I applied in late January. I was afraid they had discarded them.
They care a lot about GPA but aren't afraid to make exceptions for applicants they want.

http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Hey-O

Silver
Posts: 718
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by Hey-O » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:08 am

I'm sitting here checking my status. Again. Why do I do this to myself? Blerg. When did people say Dean Deal was coming back?

User avatar
hellome

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:41 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by hellome » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:54 am

Hey-O wrote:I'm sitting here checking my status. Again. Why do I do this to myself? Blerg. When did people say Dean Deal was coming back?
23rd

mikstew

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:18 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by mikstew » Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:02 pm

Another day starts another agonizing week of uncertainty. But who's counting?

On another note, does everyone else's SLS app have an entry for "Misconduct Explanation (if applicable)" with a checkmark beside it? Or is it just me because I have been a bad, bad boy.

User avatar
ebeth

Bronze
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:51 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by ebeth » Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:32 pm

mikstew wrote:Another day starts another agonizing week of uncertainty. But who's counting?

On another note, does everyone else's SLS app have an entry for "Misconduct Explanation (if applicable)" with a checkmark beside it? Or is it just me because I have been a bad, bad boy.
I have it too and I have not been bad to my knowledge.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
glitched

Silver
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by glitched » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:33 pm

do you think it might be too late for me to submit an update/LOCI? I recently was unofficially promoted and have been doing much more interesting work at my job. i work in a science lab so i went from filing logs to actually helping interpret and analyze data. Do you think it's worth writing this?

If so, two quick questions:
1. what is the recommended length? I don't want to write anything too long, but anything too short looks kind of lazy.
2. what format do you send it in and if by email, as a pdf attachment or in the body, and also what is the subject line of the email?

Thanks guys.

edit: could sending something in ever HURT my chances? jc

bdubs

Gold
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by bdubs » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:39 pm

glitched wrote:do you think it might be too late for me to submit a LOCI? I recently was unofficially promoted and have been doing much more interesting work at my job. i work in a science lab so i went from filing logs to actually helping interpret and analyze data. Do you think it's worth writing the LOCI?

If so, two quick questions:
1. what is the recommended length? I don't want to write anything too long, but anything too short looks kind of lazy.
2. what format do you send it in and if by email, as a pdf attachment or in the body, and also what is the subject line of the email?

Thanks guys.

edit: could a loci ever HURT my chances? jc
1) Seems like most people have been going for 1 page single spaced
2) I think PDF attachment is the easiest format for them to work with, so I would suggest that.

3) Yes, I think an LOCI could hurt you if it diverges from your application package theme. Does your WE play a significant role in your desire to attend Stanford?

User avatar
glitched

Silver
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by glitched » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:43 pm

i wrote a personal statement that showed i wanted to work in biotechnology patent law. and right now at my lab, we are working with a lot of clinical, practical, and cutting-edge technologies (some that i didn't even learn in school).

User avatar
niederbomb

Silver
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by niederbomb » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:45 pm

glitched wrote:i wrote a personal statement that showed i wanted to work in biotechnology patent law. and right now at my lab, we are working with a lot of clinical, practical, and cutting-edge technologies (some that i didn't even learn in school).
Intimidating to compete with people like this for a 1/11 chance at admission. :)

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
glitched

Silver
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by glitched » Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:50 pm

niederbomb wrote:
glitched wrote:i wrote a personal statement that showed i wanted to work in biotechnology patent law. and right now at my lab, we are working with a lot of clinical, practical, and cutting-edge technologies (some that i didn't even learn in school).
Intimidating to compete with people like this for a 1/11 chance at admission. :)
lol believe me. there is nothing to be intimidated about...


i think i'm going to just write the letter. i will regret it if i don't. i just hope it's not too late.

User avatar
cardinals1989

Silver
Posts: 1192
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by cardinals1989 » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:31 pm

glitched wrote:
niederbomb wrote:
glitched wrote:i wrote a personal statement that showed i wanted to work in biotechnology patent law. and right now at my lab, we are working with a lot of clinical, practical, and cutting-edge technologies (some that i didn't even learn in school).
Intimidating to compete with people like this for a 1/11 chance at admission. :)
lol believe me. there is nothing to be intimidated about...


i think i'm going to just write the letter. i will regret it if i don't. i just hope it's not too late.
If done well, this sounds like it could be a compelling letter. I would send it in, unless you know you might have some major updates soon. If this is so, I would hold off and compile these to avoid a deluge of updates.

Also, I agree that PDF attachment to email would be easiest for them. Keep it to a page or less, I would think.

User avatar
glitched

Silver
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by glitched » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:57 pm

anyone want to read a LOCI? haha

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by Knock » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:02 pm

glitched wrote:anyone want to read a LOCI? haha
Pm if you want

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


dc1s

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:54 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by dc1s » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:02 pm

glitched wrote:anyone want to read a LOCI? haha
I'll take a look for you. Send me a PM.

somewhere

Bronze
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:38 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by somewhere » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:06 pm

Anybody have luck getting a response confirming LOCI was received? I emailed one (attached as PDF), got no response, wrote back a week later asking for confirmation; after a few days got an email saying that they did NOT get it (so it was accidentally deleted?) and that I should send again; sent again, along with request that they confirm receipt. Still no response.

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by Knock » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:11 pm

somewhere wrote:Anybody have luck getting a response confirming LOCI was received? I emailed one (attached as PDF), got no response, wrote back a week later asking for confirmation; after a few days got an email saying that they did NOT get it (so it was accidentally deleted?) and that I should send again; sent again, along with request that they confirm receipt. Still no response.
I got a response back within a few business days. I'd call their office and straighten it out, that's pretty unusual.

coveyellow

New
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:40 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by coveyellow » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:25 pm

somewhere wrote:Anybody have luck getting a response confirming LOCI was received? I emailed one (attached as PDF), got no response, wrote back a week later asking for confirmation; after a few days got an email saying that they did NOT get it (so it was accidentally deleted?) and that I should send again; sent again, along with request that they confirm receipt. Still no response.
After sending it twice with no luck, I sent it from a different email address and quickly got a confirmation. Not really sure what the deal is with that.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


somewhere

Bronze
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:38 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by somewhere » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:31 pm

coveyellow wrote:
somewhere wrote:Anybody have luck getting a response confirming LOCI was received? I emailed one (attached as PDF), got no response, wrote back a week later asking for confirmation; after a few days got an email saying that they did NOT get it (so it was accidentally deleted?) and that I should send again; sent again, along with request that they confirm receipt. Still no response.
After sending it twice with no luck, I sent it from a different email address and quickly got a confirmation. Not really sure what the deal is with that.
What's the recommended email?

Edit: Oh, FROM a different email. Weird.

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by Knock » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:32 pm

somewhere wrote:
coveyellow wrote:
somewhere wrote:Anybody have luck getting a response confirming LOCI was received? I emailed one (attached as PDF), got no response, wrote back a week later asking for confirmation; after a few days got an email saying that they did NOT get it (so it was accidentally deleted?) and that I should send again; sent again, along with request that they confirm receipt. Still no response.
After sending it twice with no luck, I sent it from a different email address and quickly got a confirmation. Not really sure what the deal is with that.
What's the recommended email?
admissions@law.stanford.edu. I'll add this to the FAQs.

bdubs

Gold
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by bdubs » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:33 pm

somewhere wrote:
coveyellow wrote:
somewhere wrote:Anybody have luck getting a response confirming LOCI was received? I emailed one (attached as PDF), got no response, wrote back a week later asking for confirmation; after a few days got an email saying that they did NOT get it (so it was accidentally deleted?) and that I should send again; sent again, along with request that they confirm receipt. Still no response.
After sending it twice with no luck, I sent it from a different email address and quickly got a confirmation. Not really sure what the deal is with that.
What's the recommended email?

Edit: Oh, FROM a different email. Weird.
LOL at admissions using a spam filter

User avatar
niederbomb

Silver
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Post by niederbomb » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:58 pm

LOL at admissions using a spam filter
How else do your protect against Regent and long letters from Candy? Stanford is registered with LSAC, too, in some capacity. I bet they get all those emails.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”