U Chicago 2010 Forum
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
-
tamlyric

- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Ha! So in t-minus 2 minutes.crackberry wrote:2:08 PSTJericwithers wrote:When did they send out rejection and waitlist emails last time?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
You're back!hopefulundergrad wrote:Ugh, can they get back to ED WL people.
- JollyGreenGiant

- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
doubt it.psychomohel wrote:No reason to be broken hearted, they are calling on Monday as well.JollyGreenGiant wrote:Awesome. Broken-hearted. ...Better luck next time I guess.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
You guys suck at telling time.tamlyric wrote:Ha! So in t-minus 2 minutes.crackberry wrote:2:08 PSTJericwithers wrote:When did they send out rejection and waitlist emails last time?
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I guess my clock is ticking really slow.crackberry wrote:No. It's currently 3:04 PST.ChildPlease wrote:Oh. So we have 4 minutes to the waitlist/ding emails!crackberry wrote:2:08 PSTJericwithers wrote:When did they send out rejection and waitlist emails last time?
-
tamlyric

- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
crackberry wrote:You guys suck at telling time.tamlyric wrote:Ha! So in t-minus 2 minutes.crackberry wrote:2:08 PSTJericwithers wrote:When did they send out rejection and waitlist emails last time?
Edit: for humor's sake.
Last edited by tamlyric on Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?crackberry wrote:You guys suck at telling time.tamlyric wrote:Ha! So in t-minus 2 minutes.crackberry wrote:2:08 PSTJericwithers wrote:When did they send out rejection and waitlist emails last time?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- Fancy Pants

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
-
jumpinjackflash

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
if admitted students didnt get their emails yet, myb they arent done yet?
-
tamlyric

- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
FP! Still nothing?Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I laughed.Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I think there is a substantial amount of people in this thread that will verify that time has been ticking extremely slowly today.Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
-
bkwhopper

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:26 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
jumpinjackflash wrote:if admitted students didnt get their emails yet, myb they arent done yet?
No one knows. Sit back and relax. We can't control what they do. I've resigned myself to defeat.
-
bethechange

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Missed call from admissions at 5:37 EST no voicemail...updated 2/4....please tell me she didn't call me on accident and then realize it mid dial and that's why there's no vm!!!
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_RelativityChildPlease wrote:I think there is a substantial amount of people in this thread that will verify that time has been ticking extremely slowly today.Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- Fancy Pants

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
tamlyric wrote:FP! Still nothing?Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Exactly.crackberry wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_RelativityChildPlease wrote:I think there is a substantial amount of people in this thread that will verify that time has been ticking extremely slowly today.Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- opus127

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:04 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
The suspense. . . Will we really have to wait all weekend just to find out whether we're rejected or waitlisted? humph.
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Are you trying to say that I'm in a high gravitational field?crackberry wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_RelativityChildPlease wrote:I think there is a substantial amount of people in this thread that will verify that time has been ticking extremely slowly today.Fancy Pants wrote:I'm pretty sure that the answer to 'What time is it?' is not a matter of majority rules.Jericwithers wrote:Lol do you ever think that since everyone else is getting the time wrong maybe they are right and you are wrong?
I agree with you though; good thing there were no clock puzzle games on the LSAT.
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Our hearts are sinking so we are lower in the gravitational field and therefore our clocks are ticking slower.
-
zoey15

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:12 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
ding from berk at 254pm pst and JUST in at chicago at 315 pst. she was very nice and talkative.
UR 1/13--> 2/4
UR 1/13--> 2/4
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
OMG more calls!! Thank you!zoey15 wrote:ding from berk at 254pm pst and JUST in at chicago at 315 pst. she was very nice and talkative.
UR 1/13--> 2/4
- ChildPlease

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
At least you got the good news after the bad news to pick you up.zoey15 wrote:ding from berk at 254pm pst and JUST in at chicago at 315 pst. she was very nice and talkative.
UR 1/13--> 2/4
-
zoey15

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:12 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Jericwithers wrote:OMG more calls!! Thank you!zoey15 wrote:ding from berk at 254pm pst and JUST in at chicago at 315 pst. she was very nice and talkative.
UR 1/13--> 2/4
it aint over til the fat lady sings. and i dont sing.