Harvard 2010! Forum

Core · Post by **Core** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:35 pm

crackberry wrote:Still nothing here. Maybe they've forgotten about me...

It seems like they have moved on from your submission & completion date without holding you. This is a really good sign. I doubt Harvard forgot about you.

0L Hoping for 1 · Post by **0L Hoping for 1** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:44 pm

Thanks everyone, I was expecting it so its all good. COME ON STANFORD!!

musketeerlady · Post by **musketeerlady** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:46 pm

Did anybody with a hold or rejection submit after 9/28, or complete on or after 10/22?

I feel like a prisoner waiting for the guillotine axe to fall...

Core · Post by **Core** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:50 pm

musketeerlady wrote:Did anybody with a hold or rejection submit after 9/28, or complete on or after 10/22?

I feel like a prisoner waiting for the guillotine axe to fall...

+1

jlh39 · Post by **jlh39** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:52 pm

So, if I went complete in late October but then took the December LSAT, should I expect to hear back soon, or am I now grouped with people who went complete earlier this week? gah this is frustrating.

lawblahblah · Post by **lawblahblah** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:53 pm

jlh39 wrote:So, if I went complete in late October but then took the December LSAT, should I expect to be hear back soon, or am I now grouped with people who went complete earlier this week? gah this is frustrating.

Same boat, I have not heard anything since going complete 10/22.

x47point6 · Post by **x47point6** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:53 pm

Dinged by email. 172/3.8-3.9, so fairly good numbers by today's clump of LSN rejects. My extra-soft softs probably account for that.

initech · Post by **initech** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:55 pm

Dinged

babaghanouj · Post by **babaghanouj** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:56 pm

0L Hoping for 1 wrote:BIG FAT FIRST REJECTION

Yeah. No fun. This is now slightly less funny/more realistic: --LinkRemoved--

Lmao Zedong · Post by **Lmao Zedong** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:58 pm

babaghanouj wrote:Nooooooooo! Rejection email just now

--ImageRemoved--

So dies the dream. Good luck everyone.

man, aren't you 3.7x/175? so hard to believe that isn't even good for a hold or WL. this business makes me sick.

I got held today fwiw

lz06 · Post by **lz06** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:05 pm

Held also... I'm glad it took them 4 months to tell me that they have no decision for me. I guess I'll have to wait until April for my waitlist/rejection letter

rockchalk86 · Post by **rockchalk86** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:24 pm

Are all these rejections from early submitted apps? I know I have about a 1.5% chance at even a waitlist but still nothing but under review as of 11/25. Just tryin to brace myself

Dignan · Post by **Dignan** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:27 pm

babaghanouj wrote:
0L Hoping for 1 wrote:BIG FAT FIRST REJECTION
Yeah. No fun. This is now slightly less funny/more realistic: --LinkRemoved--

That's great. It's over the top, of course, but there is a lot of truth in there. Painful truth, but truth nonetheless.

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:29 pm

rockchalk86 wrote:Are all these rejections from early submitted apps? I know I have about a 1.5% chance at even a waitlist but still nothing but under review as of 11/25. Just tryin to brace myself

Yeah these are all from early-submits.

of Benito Cereno · Post by **of Benito Cereno** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:29 pm

looks like the early straight out rejections are mostly to high gpa/ sub median lsat. no high lsat splitters with early completion dates have received holds or rejections as far as i can tell.

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:34 pm

of Benito Cereno wrote:looks like the early straight out rejections are mostly to high gpa/ sub median lsat. no high lsat splitters with early completion dates have received holds or rejections as far as i can tell.

That's wrong. At least one 180 was held today. And a 178+.

georgina · Post by **georgina** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:36 pm

of Benito Cereno wrote:looks like the early straight out rejections are mostly to high gpa/ sub median lsat. no high lsat splitters with early completion dates have received holds or rejections as far as i can tell.

oh wait, but i did. high lsat splitter, jr1, held wednesday.

23fulltimecowboys · Post by **23fulltimecowboys** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:38 pm

held yesterday. no jr1

grrrstick · Post by **grrrstick** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:39 pm

Just in case the some of the high LSAT people I occasionally hear from are curious, still quiet for me. But I went complete a little after most of the people who have been held/dinged so far. Maybe it was my PS about decapitating unicorns with rainbows.

edit: or my GPA

of Benito Cereno · Post by **of Benito Cereno** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:50 pm

georgina wrote:
of Benito Cereno wrote:looks like the early straight out rejections are mostly to high gpa/ sub median lsat. no high lsat splitters with early completion dates have received holds or rejections as far as i can tell.
oh wait, but i did. high lsat splitter, jr1, held wednesday.

any high lsat rejections or just holds?
when was your jr1?

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:05 pm

of Benito Cereno wrote:
georgina wrote:
of Benito Cereno wrote:looks like the early straight out rejections are mostly to high gpa/ sub median lsat. no high lsat splitters with early completion dates have received holds or rejections as far as i can tell.
oh wait, but i did. high lsat splitter, jr1, held wednesday.
any high lsat rejections or just holds?
when was your jr1?

A 175 got rejected today. So did a 173.

lawblahblah · Post by **lawblahblah** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:13 pm

176, just got the rejection e-mail.

crackberry · Post by **crackberry** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:01 pm

Looks like that's it for the week, folks. Sorry to all those rejected and held in the past two days.

I feel a little lonely stranded on my September-complete, JR1, no word from HLS island, but I suppose I'll have my answer next week if Harvard is true to its word.

Hattori Hanzo · Post by **Hattori Hanzo** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:26 pm

lawblahblah wrote:176, just got the rejection e-mail.

eeek! I will be next!

EijiMiyake · Post by **EijiMiyake** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:25 pm

Although Harvard isn't being nearly as kind this cycle to applicants with a high LSAT score and a sub-median GPA, there are still a few examples of admits in this category. Weird. (Hah - as you can tell, this subject is near and dear to my heart.)

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/daninreallife
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/KuroiTsuki
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jjb54
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/nixxers
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/neutrino
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/rmostag1

Harvard 2010! Forum

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!

Re: Harvard 2010!