WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Jlaw, I'm not hitting on you. Asking for a friend.
- peachesthedoge
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:57 am
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Everyone is pretty until proven otherwise.
- wittyhandle
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Does anyone know how long people get leases for? Do most students do 9 months, move out, do their summer thing, then move back in? I don't plan on doing internships, etc. in St. Louis so I'm not sure if I should plan on just keeping my apartment or moving back in each year.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
It's what's on this inside that counts.Attax wrote:Everyone is pretty until proven otherwise.

- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yeah, inside, like do they have have good genes to make them pretty?JustHawkin wrote:It's what's on this inside that counts.Attax wrote:Everyone is pretty until proven otherwise.

-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:46 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I'm pretty sure the WUSTL threads are the best threads on this site. Hilarious.
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
You can always just sublease.wittyhandle wrote:Does anyone know how long people get leases for? Do most students do 9 months, move out, do their summer thing, then move back in? I don't plan on doing internships, etc. in St. Louis so I'm not sure if I should plan on just keeping my apartment or moving back in each year.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
This is very important, because sometimes someone is just wearing a weird outfit or has a bad haircut, which makes it harder to tell.Fiero85 wrote:Yeah, inside, like do they have have good genes to make them pretty?JustHawkin wrote:It's what's on this inside that counts.Attax wrote:Everyone is pretty until proven otherwise.
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:40 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
In. Has anyone else had any luck negotiating their scholarships up? I haven't tried yet, assuming it's better to wait.
- Banshee
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:28 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I'm pretty sure I applied to WUSTL as a direct result of reading this thread.Marquis wrote:I'm pretty sure the WUSTL threads are the best threads on this site. Hilarious.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
The new NLJ 250 numbers are out, but you need a subscription to see it. Above the Law provides a summary for those that are interested.
Here's the google spreadsheet that was posted in the "WUSTL grads taking questions" thread
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
Our class size was 300 for this data set, the 2L class has 50-70 less students and the 1L class only has 187 or something. So our placement percentage will change as our class sizes decrease.
For the unfamiliar, this is an incomplete snapshot of how many grads each school sends to the biggest 250 law firms in the country. I say incomplete because there are firms that do not report, so that impacts schools up and down this list.
Keep in mind that the firms included in this list are determined by attorney headcount, there are smaller firms that grads go to that are not included in the NLJ 250.
Here's the google spreadsheet that was posted in the "WUSTL grads taking questions" thread
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
Our class size was 300 for this data set, the 2L class has 50-70 less students and the 1L class only has 187 or something. So our placement percentage will change as our class sizes decrease.
For the unfamiliar, this is an incomplete snapshot of how many grads each school sends to the biggest 250 law firms in the country. I say incomplete because there are firms that do not report, so that impacts schools up and down this list.
Keep in mind that the firms included in this list are determined by attorney headcount, there are smaller firms that grads go to that are not included in the NLJ 250.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Plus "biglaw" numbers are higher than NLJ250.cusenation wrote:The new NLJ 250 numbers are out, but you need a subscription to see it. Above the Law provides a summary for those that are interested.
Here's the google spreadsheet that was posted in the "WUSTL grads taking questions" thread
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
Obligatory excuse/defense for WUSTL's numbers: Our class size was 300 for this data set, the 2L class has 50-70 less students and the 1L class only has 187 or something. So our placement percentage will change as our class sizes decrease.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Would you say the number of grads getting biglaw will stay more or less the same?cusenation wrote:The new NLJ 250 numbers are out, but you need a subscription to see it. Above the Law provides a summary for those that are interested.
Here's the google spreadsheet that was posted in the "WUSTL grads taking questions" thread
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
Obligatory excuse/defense for WUSTL's numbers: Our class size was 300 for this data set, the 2L class has 50-70 less students and the 1L class only has 187 or something. So our placement percentage will change as our class sizes decrease.
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Only one way to find out... gonna have to open them up.Fiero85 wrote:Yeah, inside, like do they have have good genes to make them pretty?JustHawkin wrote:It's what's on this inside that counts.Attax wrote:Everyone is pretty until proven otherwise.
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I think we should have a WUStL combine, similar to the NFLs, in order to determine scholarships.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Only one way to find out... gonna have to open them up.Fiero85 wrote:Yeah, inside, like do they have have good genes to make them pretty?JustHawkin wrote:It's what's on this inside that counts.Attax wrote:Everyone is pretty until proven otherwise.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
The number will most likely stay close to the same, but the percentage will rise because of the smaller class sizes.Otunga wrote:Would you say the number of grads getting biglaw will stay more or less the same?cusenation wrote:The new NLJ 250 numbers are out, but you need a subscription to see it. Above the Law provides a summary for those that are interested.
Here's the google spreadsheet that was posted in the "WUSTL grads taking questions" thread
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
Obligatory excuse/defense for WUSTL's numbers: Our class size was 300 for this data set, the 2L class has 50-70 less students and the 1L class only has 187 or something. So our placement percentage will change as our class sizes decrease.
I have a feeling firms will keep hiring the same number of Wash U grads, but now there are just fewer to pick from.
Wait. Is that a bad thing?
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Thanks Cuse. At least it's a small improvement. Here's hoping things improve with the class size cuts too!cusenation wrote:The new NLJ 250 numbers are out, but you need a subscription to see it. Above the Law provides a summary for those that are interested.
Here's the google spreadsheet that was posted in the "WUSTL grads taking questions" thread
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
Our class size was 300 for this data set, the 2L class has 50-70 less students and the 1L class only has 187 or something. So our placement percentage will change as our class sizes decrease.
For the unfamiliar, this is an incomplete snapshot of how many grads each school sends to the biggest 250 law firms in the country. I say incomplete because there are firms that do not report, so that impacts schools up and down this list.
Keep in mind that the firms included in this list are determined by attorney headcount, there are smaller firms that grads go to that are not included in the NLJ 250.
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
^Down for thisJustHawkin wrote:I think we should have a WUStL combine, similar to the NFLs, in order to determine scholarships.
As long as it is NFL style (strength and speed), and not like, smartness

- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Haven't heard any success stories yet. But we are approaching the negotiating sweet spot, IMO. Especially if you're going to March ASW, you can make a more convincingly sincere request for $$$ assistance shortly after visiting.JJ123 wrote:In. Has anyone else had any luck negotiating their scholarships up? I haven't tried yet, assuming it's better to wait.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:46 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Seconded.XO_MissCourtney wrote:I'm pretty sure I applied to WUSTL as a direct result of reading this thread.Marquis wrote:I'm pretty sure the WUSTL threads are the best threads on this site. Hilarious.
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yeah there are some 10 month places or whatever, but are probably a bit overpriced. Some people just eat the 2 months away, others try to sublease. It's a trade off and kind of a lose/lose situation, but you just gotta see what's best for you.Attax wrote:You can always just sublease.wittyhandle wrote:Does anyone know how long people get leases for? Do most students do 9 months, move out, do their summer thing, then move back in? I don't plan on doing internships, etc. in St. Louis so I'm not sure if I should plan on just keeping my apartment or moving back in each year.
I'll add that STL housing compared to most LS places is dirt cheap, so this is at least less of a big deal at WUSTL than at some places.
Last edited by Fiero85 on Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:32 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Will there be PED testing? If scholly money is on the line...Fiero85 wrote:^Down for thisJustHawkin wrote:I think we should have a WUStL combine, similar to the NFLs, in order to determine scholarships.
As long as it is NFL style (strength and speed), and not like, smartness
- bound
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Fiero85 wrote:^Down for thisJustHawkin wrote:I think we should have a WUStL combine, similar to the NFLs, in order to determine scholarships.
As long as it is NFL style (strength and speed), and not like, smartness
Down for this.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login