Berkeley 2011 applicants Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
helloperson

Bronze
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by helloperson » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:12 pm

czelede wrote:
helloperson wrote:
miracle2011 wrote:Just got the call! I am in at Berkeley!!! I guess they don't hate low GPA's as much as TLS thinks!
pretty sure it has something to do with your blackness.congrats all the same!
FTFY
are we pretending that being a URM doesn't change admissions prospects now?

Not saying good/bad, and not trying to say he doesn't deserve to be there; just saying that berkeley definitely hates low GPAs; the URM status is a mitigating factor; and it's ridiculous to pretend otherwise.

JTMan

Bronze
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by JTMan » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:12 pm

helloperson wrote:
miracle2011 wrote:Just got the call! I am in at Berkeley!!! I guess they don't hate low GPA's as much as TLS thinks!
pretty sure it has something to do with your blackness. congrats all the same!

You are not going to fit in at Berkeley with that type of mentality homie

alicen

Bronze
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:42 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by alicen » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:13 pm

SisyphusHappy wrote:How late are calls usually made? Do we have any idea?
bumping this question before it gets lost amid fighting words.

JTMan

Bronze
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by JTMan » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:14 pm

alicen wrote:
SisyphusHappy wrote:How late are calls usually made? Do we have any idea?
bumping this question before it gets lost amid fighting words.
It's only 2 pm so you've got at LEAST 3 hours to obsessively wait and stress.

User avatar
WhatSarahSaid

Bronze
Posts: 293
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:01 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by WhatSarahSaid » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:14 pm

helloperson wrote:
miracle2011 wrote:Just got the call! I am in at Berkeley!!! I guess they don't hate low GPA's as much as TLS thinks!
pretty sure it has something to do with your blackness. congrats all the same!
The actual fallacy is the assumption that the rule that Berkeley weighs GPA more than its peer schools (which is easily borne out by looking at LSN and the median GPAs of schools) is disproven by one person getting in with a lower GPA.

This "blackness" thing, true or not, was pointed out in a bizarre and inflammatory fashion.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


JTMan

Bronze
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by JTMan » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:16 pm

WhatSarahSaid wrote:
helloperson wrote:
miracle2011 wrote:Just got the call! I am in at Berkeley!!! I guess they don't hate low GPA's as much as TLS thinks!
pretty sure it has something to do with your blackness. congrats all the same!
The actual fallacy is the assumption that the rule that Berkeley weighs GPA more than its peer schools (which is easily borne out by looking at LSN and the median GPAs of schools) is disproven by one person getting in with a lower GPA.

This "blackness" thing, true or not, was pointed out in a bizarre and inflammatory fashion.
Let's end this and get back to waiting shall we? helloperson is on their own.

User avatar
helloperson

Bronze
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by helloperson » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:19 pm

any non-CR1 non-CR2 people getting decisions this week?

User avatar
LAWLAW09

Bronze
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:09 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by LAWLAW09 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:19 pm

helloperson wrote:
czelede wrote:
helloperson wrote:
miracle2011 wrote:Just got the call! I am in at Berkeley!!! I guess they don't hate low GPA's as much as TLS thinks!
pretty sure it has something to do with your blackness.congrats all the same!
FTFY
are we pretending that being a URM doesn't change admissions prospects now?

Not saying good/bad, and not trying to say he doesn't deserve to be there; just saying that berkeley definitely hates low GPAs; the URM status is a mitigating factor; and it's ridiculous to pretend otherwise.

not holding my breath for you to one day post, "pretty sure it has something to do with your whiteness."

you know, bc it's not hard to track how being White in America changes ones admissions prospects. or are you still pretending?

czelede

Silver
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:54 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by czelede » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:22 pm

Leave the affirmative action debate out of the thread, guys. While URM admissions are often hard to predict, it has been noticed that schools prefer URM reverse splitters, so I think it's understandable why a low GPA candidate would be surprised by admission, regardless of their race. A simple "congrats" is all you really need to say.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Flips88

Diamond
Posts: 15246
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by Flips88 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:25 pm

Had to be done:

--ImageRemoved--

sarahlawg

Silver
Posts: 1001
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by sarahlawg » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:25 pm

okay, I am in tear-the-band-aid-off mode. Would love to speak to Dean Tom, but god, get this over with already.

congrats to those getting calls! I'm super jealous your wait is over.

c_dubya_s

Silver
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:58 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by c_dubya_s » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:26 pm

Flips88 wrote:Had to be done:

--ImageRemoved--
And on that note, let us conclude this debate. Congrats to all!

cawquette

New
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 12:03 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by cawquette » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:29 pm

helloperson wrote:
czelede wrote:
helloperson wrote:
miracle2011 wrote:Just got the call! I am in at Berkeley!!! I guess they don't hate low GPA's as much as TLS thinks!
pretty sure it has something to do with your blackness.congrats all the same!
FTFY
are we pretending that being a URM doesn't change admissions prospects now?

Not saying good/bad, and not trying to say he doesn't deserve to be there; just saying that berkeley definitely hates low GPAs; the URM status is a mitigating factor; and it's ridiculous to pretend otherwise.
agreed.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


cold_logic

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:14 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by cold_logic » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:29 pm

But seriously: has everyone who's received a call talked to Dean Tom, or are other people making calls, too?

Also: any status-checker movement?

r6_philly

Diamond
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by r6_philly » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:30 pm

Congrats to all admits!!!!

You could be called by someone else in the office as well. Dean Tom was not the only person who made calls earlier in the cycle.
Last edited by r6_philly on Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

miracle2011

Bronze
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:51 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by miracle2011 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:30 pm

lol sorry for causing such commotion!

sarahh

Silver
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by sarahh » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:31 pm

helloperson wrote:Not saying good/bad, and not trying to say he doesn't deserve to be there; just saying that berkeley definitely hates low GPAs; the URM status is a mitigating factor; and it's ridiculous to pretend otherwise.
California public schools, including UC Berkeley, by law, are not allowed to consider URM status. They like high GPAs, but they have a more hollistic review process than most other schools. It is not unheard of for someone with low numbers but unique softs or a compelling personal background to get in.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


cold_logic

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:14 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by cold_logic » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:33 pm

sarahh wrote:California public schools, including UC Berkeley, by law, are not allowed to consider URM status. They like high GPAs, but they have a more hollistic review process than most other schools. It is not unheard of for someone with low numbers but unique softs or a compelling personal background to get in.
QFT. For once, Prop 209 can end a discussion rather than start one.

User avatar
sgtgrumbles

Silver
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by sgtgrumbles » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:36 pm

LAWLAW09 wrote: not holding my breath for you to one day post, "pretty sure it has something to do with your whiteness."

you know, bc it's not hard to track how being White in America changes ones admissions prospects. or are you still pretending?
+10000000

User avatar
camelcrema

Bronze
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:43 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by camelcrema » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:36 pm

So kimpossible and Quailman were both from California (that was a weird phrase to type). Are they calling west coasters first, maybe?

r6_philly

Diamond
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by r6_philly » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:36 pm

cold_logic wrote:
sarahh wrote:California public schools, including UC Berkeley, by law, are not allowed to consider URM status. They like high GPAs, but they have a more hollistic review process than most other schools. It is not unheard of for someone with low numbers but unique softs or a compelling personal background to get in.
QFT. For once, Prop 209 can end a discussion rather than start one.
I will start one in your honor - how do you enforce "consideration"?

edited to clarify that I support the consideration.
Last edited by r6_philly on Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


JTMan

Bronze
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by JTMan » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:37 pm

camelcrema wrote:So kimpossible and Quailman were both from California (that was a weird phrase to type). Are they calling west coasters first, maybe?
Either that or the animated superhero applicants

User avatar
cardinals1989

Silver
Posts: 1192
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by cardinals1989 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:38 pm

r6_philly wrote:
cold_logic wrote:
sarahh wrote:California public schools, including UC Berkeley, by law, are not allowed to consider URM status. They like high GPAs, but they have a more hollistic review process than most other schools. It is not unheard of for someone with low numbers but unique softs or a compelling personal background to get in.
QFT. For once, Prop 209 can end a discussion rather than start one.
I will start one in your honor - how do you enforce "consideration"?
Coming in to cause mischief I see? :P

User avatar
Flips88

Diamond
Posts: 15246
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by Flips88 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:38 pm

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DEBATE IN THE MIDDLE OF PEOPLE GETTING ACCEPTANCE CALLS:

Image

miracle2011

Bronze
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:51 pm

Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants

Post by miracle2011 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:38 pm

camelcrema wrote:So kimpossible and Quailman were both from California (that was a weird phrase to type). Are they calling west coasters first, maybe?
I am on the east coast so I don't think so.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”