Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ph5354a » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:21 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:so im an outright ding then? 4/172. can someone please answer. complete sep no hold or reserve......
I would bet my 174 (I don't actually have any money) that you are not an outright ding. I know we're all skeptical about this, but there are plenty more acceptances to go out still.

THERE HAS TO BE!!!!!

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:22 pm

It looks like several people with really good numbers dodged the hold - I think it's a good thing for you guys. It seems like CLS is sorta parsing what's left of the applicant pool. The people they least want to accept got reserved, now some of us with slightly better chances got held, and the rest with strong numbers might get an acceptance soon or might also get held later.
Last edited by Crowing on Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

spyke123

Bronze
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spyke123 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:22 pm

I've been checking last years thread and I don't think hold really means much. I saw plenty of people get in after being held while some of the forgotten ended up getting reserved straight.

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:23 pm

spyke123 wrote:I've been checking last years thread and I don't think hold really means much. I saw plenty of people get in after being held while some of the forgotten ended up getting reserved straight.
you dodge the hold man?

User avatar
02889

Bronze
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 02889 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:24 pm

spyke123 wrote:I've been checking last years thread and I don't think hold really means much. I saw plenty of people get in after being held while some of the forgotten ended up getting reserved straight.
Oh, right. I forgot about the forgotten. I wonder if that is my fate now.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


swordking90

Bronze
Posts: 186
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by swordking90 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:25 pm

A few new WLs popped up on LSN. I wonder if Columbia is really WLing people at the same time, or whether those people mistook the hold as the WL...

User avatar
Jaqen

Silver
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Jaqen » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:27 pm

No hold, no reserve, no nothin'. Submitted early November.

spyke123

Bronze
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spyke123 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:28 pm

Crowing wrote:
spyke123 wrote:I've been checking last years thread and I don't think hold really means much. I saw plenty of people get in after being held while some of the forgotten ended up getting reserved straight.
you dodge the hold man?
I dodged the bullet today but I submitted in jan though. Don't think any jan people got held yet? (I'm seeing absolutely no movment everywhere. No acceptances no holds no wl except fr at Berkeley )

User avatar
megagnarley

Bronze
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by megagnarley » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:32 pm

Image

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:33 pm

Crowing wrote:It looks like several people with really good numbers dodged the hold - I think it's a good thing for you guys. It seems like CLS is sorta parsing what's left of the applicant pool. The people they least want to accept got reserved, now some of us with slightly better chances got held, and the rest with strong numbers might get an acceptance soon or might also get held later.
What if you have a crappy LSAT, median gpa, applied early and heard nothing so far? Mylsn says waitlist is 3 times more likely than a ding and only a 10% chance at acceptance. Am I forgotten or dingsville?

MythicBlowfish

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MythicBlowfish » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:34 pm

spyke123 wrote:
Crowing wrote:
spyke123 wrote:I've been checking last years thread and I don't think hold really means much. I saw plenty of people get in after being held while some of the forgotten ended up getting reserved straight.
you dodge the hold man?
I dodged the bullet today but I submitted in jan though. Don't think any jan people got held yet? (I'm seeing absolutely no movment everywhere. No acceptances no holds no wl except fr at Berkeley )
<-- Held and submitted early Jan.

User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ph5354a » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:37 pm

MythicBlowfish wrote:
<-- Held and submitted early Jan.
Interesting, there are Januarians among the holds. Mind giving us some stats?
Last edited by ph5354a on Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

oldschool123

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:23 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by oldschool123 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:38 pm

Also Held today. Complete mid-November. 171/3.5x.

After Boalt's outright rejection I was fully expecting the same from CLS, so even though it is pretty frustrating to have to wait even longer for a decision, I'll take this as good news for now.

Althoughhhh the email should not have said "Please see the attached document for a decision on your application to Columbia Law School." Should've said "Please see the attached document so we can tell you about our continued lack of a decision on your application"!!!!!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
ssanonymous

Silver
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ssanonymous » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:38 pm

are these emails trickling in?

lak90

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:56 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by lak90 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:40 pm

oldschool123 wrote:Also Held today. Complete mid-November. 171/3.5x.

After Boalt's outright rejection I was fully expecting the same from CLS, so even though it is pretty frustrating to have to wait even longer for a decision, I'll take this as good news for now.

Althoughhhh the email should not have said "Please see the attached document for a decision on your application to Columbia Law School." Should've said "Please see the attached document so we can tell you about our continued lack of a decision on your application"!!!!!
+1

BSC

Bronze
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:11 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BSC » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:46 pm

Held today. Submitted 11/20, 3.88 (3.90 after I send in this new transcript) and 169, 171.

Sent them an email asking if I could send in another LOR. Probably gonna write a LOCI too. I really want this.

MythicBlowfish

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MythicBlowfish » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:51 pm

ph5354a wrote:
MythicBlowfish wrote:
<-- Held and submitted early Jan.
Interesting, there are Januarians among the holds. Mind giving us some stats?
170/3.99

It would also be helpful to have some rough info on the proportion of holds that are accepted, reserved or rejected. The email's language seemed encouraging, fwiw.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


lak90

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:56 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by lak90 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:52 pm

MythicBlowfish wrote:
ph5354a wrote:
MythicBlowfish wrote:
<-- Held and submitted early Jan.
Interesting, there are Januarians among the holds. Mind giving us some stats?
170/3.99

It would also be helpful to have some rough info on the proportion of holds that are accepted, reserved or rejected. The email's language seemed encouraging, fwiw.
I'm definitely feeling like I'm on the low end here...

Klerris

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Klerris » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:07 pm

Held. 176/3.0x. Complete late October.

Really just want an answer at this point! I mean.... Come on.
I've been waiting on this ding for months.

soych

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by soych » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:10 pm

Checking in.

Submitted application in early January, completion pending since January 15th. It's been five weeks now; starting to be concerned.

User avatar
bob loblaw11

Bronze
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:14 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bob loblaw11 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:13 pm

soych wrote:Checking in.

Submitted application in early January, completion pending since January 15th. It's been five weeks now; starting to be concerned.
Definitely email! The status checker page suggests that two weeks is appropriate; I emailed around week three. Good luck!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Jpreece59

New
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:26 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Jpreece59 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:16 pm

nanochick wrote:178, 3.0X, strong softs. Looks like a lot of splitters one direction or the other. Any 3.9X want to pair with me? :)
It's a date. Now I'll trade you .5 GPA points for 3 LSAT points. Deal?
171/4.1+

User avatar
bluecouch

Bronze
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bluecouch » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:17 pm

bob loblaw11 wrote:
soych wrote:Checking in.

Submitted application in early January, completion pending since January 15th. It's been five weeks now; starting to be concerned.
Definitely email! The status checker page suggests that two weeks is appropriate; I emailed around week three. Good luck!
I agree that you should email. I sat at completion pending for a really long time, and it was due to a data coding error in the admissions office. So... instead of going complete in the middle of December, I went complete in the middle of January.

Don't be like me. Email.

User avatar
ssanonymous

Silver
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ssanonymous » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:18 pm

bluecouch wrote:
bob loblaw11 wrote:
soych wrote:Checking in.

Submitted application in early January, completion pending since January 15th. It's been five weeks now; starting to be concerned.
Definitely email! The status checker page suggests that two weeks is appropriate; I emailed around week three. Good luck!
I agree that you should email. I sat at completion pending for a really long time, and it was due to a data coding error in the admissions office. So... instead of going complete in the middle of December, I went complete in the middle of January.

Don't be like me. Email.
Same. I waited three months to finally email them, and I went complete the same day.

soych

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by soych » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:21 pm

ssanonymous wrote:
bluecouch wrote:
bob loblaw11 wrote:
soych wrote:Checking in.

Submitted application in early January, completion pending since January 15th. It's been five weeks now; starting to be concerned.
Definitely email! The status checker page suggests that two weeks is appropriate; I emailed around week three. Good luck!
I agree that you should email. I sat at completion pending for a really long time, and it was due to a data coding error in the admissions office. So... instead of going complete in the middle of December, I went complete in the middle of January.

Don't be like me. Email.
Same. I waited three months to finally email them, and I went complete the same day.
Wow, I'll definitely send an email tonight then. Thanks for the advice, everyone.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”