+1babaghanouj wrote:Congrats!!iminlstrick wrote:In (Chicago-Area) via snail mail today!!!!! HOLY HELL THIS IS ME FREAKING OUT!!!!!
Columbia 2010 Forum
- Rand M.
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am
Re: Columbia 2010
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:18 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Have any December LSAT test-takers been accepted?
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I just got in today. I was a December re-taker and I already had all of my other stuff in well before hand. 3.6/177nimhnimh wrote:Have any December LSAT test-takers been accepted?
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Yes for those who applied before the test, no for those who applied after, it seems.nimhnimh wrote:Have any December LSAT test-takers been accepted?
- fidesverita
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
If we're submitting a LOCI, who should we address it to? The director or dean of admissions?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:07 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
yeah, about that...if i went complete back in early Dec. (RD) and did not get an acceptance in this batch, should I start getting that LOCI ready? or are there more waves to come?fidesverita wrote:If we're submitting a LOCI, who should we address it to? The director or dean of admissions?
- groundkontrol
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:25 am
Re: Columbia 2010
This is me. Submitted in November with September LSAT score. Asked the committee to wait for my December score. I live in NYC and go to Columbia for graduate school so I'm really hoping I luck out. I pass the law school everyday and sometimes I just want to go inside and beg them to accept me haha.BenJ wrote:Yes for those who applied before the test, no for those who applied after, it seems.nimhnimh wrote:Have any December LSAT test-takers been accepted?

Also, have any RD applicants been waitlisted or rejected yet?
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
umm, no news (sorry for bump), but if any of the info/grade request people from last week (owhlcn, lysis, ...) hear back, be sure to update!
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:06 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
will do. wish i had something to report. le sigh.georgina wrote:umm, no news (sorry for bump), but if any of the info/grade request people from last week (owhlcn, lysis, ...) hear back, be sure to update!
- Lermontov
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I wrote to the dean after being deferred from the ED batch. Not sure why you would write to the director (not really sure who the director would be...). Received a nice, generic email thanking me and adding that it would be put in my file.fidesverita wrote:If we're submitting a LOCI, who should we address it to? The director or dean of admissions?
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
LOL at CLS wanting grade reports from lysis and GeePee. What do they think, that their GPAs dropped like .2 to below their 75th? Maybe it's just a way to gauge interest.
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
VoidSix wrote:LOL at CLS wanting grade reports from lysis and GeePee. What do they think, that their GPAs dropped like .2 to below their 75th? Maybe it's just a way to gauge interest.

-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:43 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
out of curiosity, when did you apply?j nyc wrote:just got an email request for fall grades too this morning...
columbia i love you please return my affection.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:43 pm
-
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:26 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Complete 12/11. Bad news if I didn't hear anything in this most recent batch?
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:11 am
Re: Columbia 2010
ive been complete since 11/18 and i havent heard anythinglikeaspark wrote:Complete 12/11. Bad news if I didn't hear anything in this most recent batch?


Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- lsathalon
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:37 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Not necessarily. While some December completes have heard, many with good numbers have not. Admissions told 1 individual with a 12/7 complete date that people with complete dates around that time mostly wouldn't hear until late February.likeaspark wrote:Complete 12/11. Bad news if I didn't hear anything in this most recent batch?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
What's up, everyone. I'm in SoCal (178/3.75, but an AA from community college) and definitely starting to worry. But I did a search on LSN of Columbia applicants for this cycle with GPAs between 3.6 and 4.0 and LSATs 170-180, and there a ton of people in there who applied in September and October and early November who are still pending, including quite a few with both numbers above Columbia's medians. So there have to be more acceptances coming for those early applicants unless the applicant pool this year is absolutely insane.
Anyways, Columbia would be amAzing - is anyone else here interested in the 3rd year LSE LL.M. program?
Anyways, Columbia would be amAzing - is anyone else here interested in the 3rd year LSE LL.M. program?
- irie
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
congrats, now just HYS?Rand M. wrote:+1babaghanouj wrote:Congrats!!iminlstrick wrote:In (Chicago-Area) via snail mail today!!!!! HOLY HELL THIS IS ME FREAKING OUT!!!!!

I envy your Darrow, but not the decision you have to make now re CLS, maybe you'll get some $$ from columbia too!
- AliceB
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm interested in the LL.B. 4 year program.....but hope is slowly slipping away, day by day.Nomidzoh wrote:What's up, everyone. I'm in SoCal (178/3.75, but an AA from community college) and definitely starting to worry. But I did a search on LSN of Columbia applicants for this cycle with GPAs between 3.6 and 4.0 and LSATs 170-180, and there a ton of people in there who applied in September and October and early November who are still pending, including quite a few with both numbers above Columbia's medians. So there have to be more acceptances coming for those early applicants unless the applicant pool this year is absolutely insane.
Anyways, Columbia would be amAzing - is anyone else here interested in the 3rd year LSE LL.M. program?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I definitely am. I love london more than anything (see avatar) and wouldnt mind working there at some point. (although im partial to kings college or UCL instead of LSE). However, I don't know that I want to miss out on a 3rd year in nyc, and you have to apply so early (feb/march of 1L) that I could easily change my mind either way.Nomidzoh wrote:What's up, everyone. I'm in SoCal (178/3.75, but an AA from community college) and definitely starting to worry. But I did a search on LSN of Columbia applicants for this cycle with GPAs between 3.6 and 4.0 and LSATs 170-180, and there a ton of people in there who applied in September and October and early November who are still pending, including quite a few with both numbers above Columbia's medians. So there have to be more acceptances coming for those early applicants unless the applicant pool this year is absolutely insane.
Anyways, Columbia would be amAzing - is anyone else here interested in the 3rd year LSE LL.M. program?
- of Benito Cereno
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm very very very very very very interested in the LSE program, specifically the European Law speciality.Nomidzoh wrote:What's up, everyone. I'm in SoCal (178/3.75, but an AA from community college) and definitely starting to worry. But I did a search on LSN of Columbia applicants for this cycle with GPAs between 3.6 and 4.0 and LSATs 170-180, and there a ton of people in there who applied in September and October and early November who are still pending, including quite a few with both numbers above Columbia's medians. So there have to be more acceptances coming for those early applicants unless the applicant pool this year is absolutely insane.
Anyways, Columbia would be amAzing - is anyone else here interested in the 3rd year LSE LL.M. program?
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
+1 and also interested in the 4 year LLB, but, well, hope is fading.of Benito Cereno wrote:I'm very very very very very very interested in the LSE program, specifically the European Law speciality.Nomidzoh wrote:What's up, everyone. I'm in SoCal (178/3.75, but an AA from community college) and definitely starting to worry. But I did a search on LSN of Columbia applicants for this cycle with GPAs between 3.6 and 4.0 and LSATs 170-180, and there a ton of people in there who applied in September and October and early November who are still pending, including quite a few with both numbers above Columbia's medians. So there have to be more acceptances coming for those early applicants unless the applicant pool this year is absolutely insane.
Anyways, Columbia would be amAzing - is anyone else here interested in the 3rd year LSE LL.M. program?
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Hopefully this eases a few minds:
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... er=asc&p=7
Acceptances reported almost every day after the first RD decision day (1/22/09). Also, if you're borderline, it seems that most of the holds and waitlists went out in late February (2/23/09). It's also worth noting that many of those who were held or waitlisted with numbers above the median were accepted at HLS. Columbia seems to have a knack for knowing whether CLS / NYC is really someone's thing.
If I don't get in, I'll probably beat myself up for writing my PS about public interest. I imagine CLS is wary of PI people with NYU right next door and Berkeley on the West Coast. Not to say they couldn't not like my file for other reasons.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... er=asc&p=7
Acceptances reported almost every day after the first RD decision day (1/22/09). Also, if you're borderline, it seems that most of the holds and waitlists went out in late February (2/23/09). It's also worth noting that many of those who were held or waitlisted with numbers above the median were accepted at HLS. Columbia seems to have a knack for knowing whether CLS / NYC is really someone's thing.
If I don't get in, I'll probably beat myself up for writing my PS about public interest. I imagine CLS is wary of PI people with NYU right next door and Berkeley on the West Coast. Not to say they couldn't not like my file for other reasons.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login